"Save the NHS". Spend even more money - because we are now so very sick.

We need to look at why we have been asked to "Save the NHS" for the last two years.

When the NHS began, in 1948, its budget was £345.31 billion. This represented just 0.8% of the country's GDP (Gross Domestic Product) at the time. This allowed £5.24 to be spent on each person for the year.

In 2020, the NHS budget had risen to £1884.49 billion. This represented 7.36% of GDP. And £2,419.37 could be spent on each individual.

Every year, without fail, we are told that the NHS requires even more money, for more testing, more drugs and vaccines, more operations; indeed, for more of everything. And the NHS usually gets what it wants as spending on health care is popular with politicians and governments - largely because it is popular with voters.

• Yet, each and every year from 1948 to today we have got sicker!
• And it's because of this that the NHS needs more money, each and every year!

The incidence every chronic disease is now considerably higher than in 1948, most running at unpecedented epidemic levels, and still increasing. My 2021 blog, "CHRONIC DISEASE. The rise and rise of chronic diseases over the last 100 years; and the introduction of some new ones" outlined this as far as ADHD, Allergy, Alzhemier's Disease and Dementia, Arthritis, Asthma, and Autism were concerned. I outlined far more in "Epidemic of Chronic Disease: why we are sicker now than we ever have been", a chapter in my "The Failure of Conventional Medicine" e-book, including Autoimmune Disease, Birth Defects, Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, Chronic Fatigue (ME), COPD, Diabetes, Irritable Bowel, Mental Health, MS, Osteoporosis - and many more.

• These two facts cannot be denied. 
• Health services ARE costing more, year by year. 
• And year by year we ARE getting sicker. 
• How is it possible to justify this - year by year? 
• Why is it that we fail to put these two facts together - year by year? 
• In what other sphere of life would we be prepared to pay more for less only to get more of what we don't want?

Nor is it just chronic disease that is the problem for the NHS. The Covid-19 debacle shows that it also has no answer for infections - to the extraordinary extent that government felt the need to impose social distancing, face masks, test and trace, and lockdowns on us for two years in order to "Save the NHS". The NHS could not save its patients. Its patients had to safe the NHS! And in order to do this we were prepared to seriously sacrifice our social lives, harm the economy, ruin our livelihoods, damage our children's development, put on hold their education, damage mental health, and much else.

Then, in December 2020, the Covid-19 vaccines were introduced. We were told that these vaccines would save us, and return life to normal, within just a few months. We will all be free by February! Do you remember this headline? Check it out here! And this, by the way, was February 2021.

Over one year later the Covid-19 crisis is still with us. Two dosess were insufficient; so a booster was offered; still people were going down with the virus; so perhaps a 2nd booster, perhaps an annual jab? And still people continue to catch the virus.

The vaccines are causing serious patient harm. So who is protecting the patients? Certainly not the drug regulators! Thousands of people have reported millions of serious adverse vaccine reactions, including death, following vaccination - but nothing is done - the general public is not even told.  

So why not mandate the vaccines! Let's force people who wish to remain vaccine free to get vaccinated. Let's threaten their social life, their employment, their everything. The vaccines are safe and effective.

Let everyone see just how autocratic a democratically elected government can become!

So what is happening to our health services? Why is the NHS unable to reduce the levels of illness and disease? Why is it unable to cope with infections? Why do patients need to save the NHS? Why can't the NHS save patients? Why have we got sicker, year by year? Why do we still  need to spend more and more on the NHS?

The answer is simple, but not self evident to anyone convinced about the integrity of medical science, and the power of drugs and vaccines. It is the failure to recognise several key facts, our refusal to look beyond the perceived wisdom of those pharmaceutical interests that who now dominate and control the NHS.

1. The refusal to recognise that the NHS has given a complete monopoly to pharmaceutical medicine; good health, we believe, comes out of a bottle of pills, or a vial of vaccine.
   
2. The refusal to recognise the ineffectiveness of treatment based on pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines, and their ongoing failure to reduce levels of sickness.
3. The refusal to recognise that drug/vaccine "side effects", "adverse reactions", and "DIEs", have on increasing levels of sickness, and how they have actually led to the creation of illness.

The NHS is making us sicker. And it will continue to do so until such time we are prepared to question the dominance of pharmaceutical medicine, and to critically examine its record rather than its propaganda.

In 1948, the new NHS committed to providing us with "the best medicine", and to do so "free, at the point of need". It never committed to become the slave of the rich and powerful pharmaceutical industry. The NHS has sold itself, heart and soul, and is now paying the price. 

Or rather patients are paying the price, funded by the tax payers.

 

Rehabilitating HRT. Pharmaceutical medicine continues the process.

Today, 2 February 2022, the UK's drug regulator, the MHRA, has suggested that Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) could become available over-the-counter without a doctor's prescription. The possibility was heralded by the BBC, always a great supporter of pharmaceutical drugs. The drug is Gina 10, or estadiol, and the BBC article goes to great lengths interviewing conventional medical practitioners, who provide reassurance about the safety of the drug. For example, they quote the NHS.

            "Some types of HRT slightly increase the risk of breast cancer and blood clots in some women, but the risks are small and usually outweighed by the benefits".

I have written before about the history of HRT drugs. In November 2015, for instance, I wrote an article entitled "Menopause Issues and NICE guidelines? HRT might cause cancer, heart problems and dementia, but what the hell, women should take it anyway! In this I quoted from the British Medical Journal in , 2007 (335: 239-44).

            "Eventually, several trials produced results that were so bad they had to be discontinued. In 2002, trials conducted by the Women’s Health Initiative in the USA, described as 'the largest and best designed federal studies of HRT'  was halted because women taking the hormones had a significantly increased risk of breast  and cervical cancer, heart attacks, stroke and blood clots. More trials were terminated in 2007, when a study of 5,692 women taking HRT raised similar concerns but added 'more definition to the health risks'.

At the time I suspected that this might prove to be the end of HRT, but I clearly underestimated the ability of the conventional medical establishment to promote and sell dangerous drugs.

My 2015 article now contains several subsequent postscripts about conventional medicine's attempts to 'rehabilitate' hormone replacement therapy. The BBC enumerates how successful this rehabilitation has been. From a complete ban on HRT drugs in 2007 it states that 150,000 women are now prescribed HRT.

 So perhaps Gina 10, or estadiol, is different, perhaps it is safer? The BBC certainly wants us to believe this. It quotes one doctor.

            "It's different to HRT and it doesn't reduce the health risks of the menopause, but it is very safe".

 Whenever I hear a conventional doctor saying that a pharmaceutical drug or vaccine is safe, I run for cover! So I went to the drugs.com website to check. It makes horrendous reading, and contains one of the longest "warning" boxes that I have ever seen. I will not reproduce it here, the above link can be easily accessed.

Yet any woman who is considering taking this drug, it is important to read this information before making their decision. An "informed decision" is only possible after reading it - as it is clear conventional medicine will never be honest about the safety of their medicines.

• The BBC, as usual, are willing to promote a pharmaceutical drug, regardless of how dangerous it might be. 
• Conventional medical doctors may be willing to toe the line, and call any pharmaceutical drug "safe".

But no patient should ever take any pharmaceutical drug without checking the known, or at least the admitted adverse reactions is can cause.

So what should a woman do, who is suffering from serious menopausal symptoms? Conventional medicine has nothing else to offer - which is one of the reasons HRT is being regularly rehabilitated by the NHS. Women should certainly not suffer in silence. There are alternative to conventional medical treatment, much safe, and more effective treatments offered by natural medical therapies.

Homeopathy is one of them, certainly the one that I would recommend.

Why Homeopathy? for Menopause.

If it does nothing else (and it will) it will protect you from the harm of pharmaceutical treatment.

 

See also my previous blogs on the dangers of Hormone Replacement Therapy.

August 2016.         HRT Treatment causes Cancer. Old News but New News.

October 2019.       BREAST CANCER. Why is it that conventional medicine does not understand that HRT is a significant cause of this? Who protects patients from harmful drugs?

November 2021.   The Menopause, HRT, and Breast Cancer.

 

 

 

The Demise of Pharmaceutical Drug Regulation: there is no effective system for protecting patients from drug/vaccine harm

Pharmaceutical Drug Regulation has only one purpose - safeguarding patients from drugs and vaccines that can cause serious harm.

The main problem with drug regulation, around the world, is that it no longer protects patients. The process has been taken over by the pharmaceutical industry.

The origins of the existing system of drug regulation goes back to the Thalidomide tragedy of the 1960's, after which most countries adopted a formal process of drug regulation along similar lines. It was a good, logical process. But 'the regulated' is now in control of 'the regulated' - so the system no longer works.

In the first stage of drug regulation, any new drug and vaccine have to be tested by medical science, and as I have written elsewhere, medical science is funded largely by the drug industry, so is under the financial control of the pharmaceutical industry.  

What this has meant, increasingly, is that new drugs have been approved for use that have caused serious patient harm. 

So there have been a plethora of pharmaceutical drugs, all fully tested by medical science, and approved by drug regulators, that have had to be banned or withdrawn over the years - although only after many years, and following considerable patient harm. Worse, pharmaceutical companies have created new drugs, and marketed them to patients in the full knowledge that they can cause serious patient harm. This is all a matter of record, not debate - follow the blue links to read more.

The pharmaceutical industry, in close alliance with medical science, has a long, largely hidden history of dishonesty, corruption and fraud.

Hence, the importance of the second stage of drug regulation - the reporting system. Many of the drugs and vaccines that are being prescribed to patients today will be harming patients, and so will ultimately be banned or withdrawn. Albeit in hindsight, the reporting system should be protecting patients - but it isn't. The reporting process is, or rather should be, a simple one.

1. A drug or vaccine is prescribed a drug, and it is taken by a patient.
2. The patient experiences a side effect, or adverse drug reaction.
3. The patient should be routinely asked to report “any suspected side effect”. The patient does not have to prove a link between the side effect and the drug - it is sufficient to suspect a link.
4. When informed, the doctor is then legally obliged to report the side effect, or the adverse reaction, to the national drug regulator.
   
5. The drug regulator is then obliged to (i) record all reported side effects and adverse reactions, and (ii) to intervene in the interests of patient safety when they believe that a drug is causing serious harm to patients.

The ignorance and non-compliance surrounding this process is much in evidence. The system breaks down at each and every stage. The result is that several studies have shown that only about 1% of serious adverse drug reactions are ever reported to drug regulators. This is how drug reporting is subverted - in the interests of conventional medicine and the pharmaceutical industry.

• The patient takes the drug, having been told (invariably) that it is both safe and effective. Most patients are not aware of the reporting system, nor are they told about it.
  
• The patient, who does not expect to experience a side effect from a drug that has been declared as being "safe", will often assume that an adverse drug reaction is part of the illness, or even part of the healing process. So for a variety of reasons they do not report it. The doctor is, after all, very busy!
  
• When a patient does report an adverse drug reaction they often face a 'defensive' doctor; it is, after all, the doctor who has prescribed the drug, usually after telling the patient it was entirely safe. And in any case the doctor is busy, and reporting to the drug regulator takes time. So, too often, the patient is often told that it is NOT a drug side effect - and the matter is left unreported.
  
• The non-reporting of adverse drug reactions was recognised to be a problem in or around 2008, and consequently patients were given a direct route to the reporting system that does not involve the doctor. However, very few patients know about this, or how and where to do this. When was the last time you remember being told about reporting adverse drug reactions? And so, yet again, it is not done.
• So drug regulators receive reports of only 1% (and probably far less) of adverse drug or vaccine reactions. In other words, the harm that is being caused by pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines is discounted by at least a factor of 100. This enables the drug regulator to tell doctors, and for doctors to tell their patients, that adverse drug reactions are "rare" or "uncommon".
  
• Yet even when a drug or vaccine is known to cause serious adverse reactions, drug regulators rarely intervene quickly. The data is supposed to be evaluated "by a team of medical safety experts", made up of "doctors, pharmaceutics and medical scientists" to identify "previously unknown" safety issues. Yet too regularly, national drug regulators prefer to allow patient harm to happen over a period of several years; until such time, that is, that the issue can no longer be kept from the public view. 
• So reports of adverse drug reactions are always counted, and then published. They have to be, by law. So they appear on obscure government websites; but, too often, little else is done, and the general public is not informed.

One of the most serious problems is that the entire reporting process is conducted by senior members of the conventional medical establishment, who usually have strong links to the pharmaceutical companies. So drug regulators usually have strong vested interests in the success, and the profitability, of drugs and vaccines they are supposed to be regulating.

I wrote a blog in July 2021 that linked this flawed process to the reports of serious adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines. It outlined the large and growing numbers of patients reporting serious adverse vaccine reactions to the vaccines, and looked in detail at how the UK's drug regulator were discounting the patient harm being caused by the vaccines. No action was being taken to protect patients. Six months on there is still no action. In the UK, 2,000 people have reported to the MHRA that a patient has died shortly after taking one of the vaccines. There is still no action being taken to protect patients. Indeed, the general public is still unaware that this is happening. The government continues to insist that the Covid-19 vaccines are safe. Conventional medicine continues to inject these vaccines into people's arms, into their bloodstream. The mainstream media goes along with this misinformation.

This is a description of a failed system, a system designed to protect patients from harm that does not work. National drug regulators are aware of the data, it is their data; but for some reason the general public is not being informed.

My July 2021 blog has produced considerable criticism from supporters of pharmaceutical medicine, most of whom are disparaging about the drug reporting scheme, even question the veracity and validity of the huge numbers of reported adverse reactions to Covid-19 vaccines. They say....

• reports to not prove prove a link between the adverse reactions and the drug, 
• the reports are fabricated by 'anti-vaxxers' who do not like pharmaceutical medicine,
• the number of reported adverse reactions is small in comparison to the number of people who have been vaccinated,
• that even those who died "would have died anyway",
• or even that reports cannot be true as the 'scientific' testing of the vaccines did not suggest that the vaccines caused this kind of reaction.
  

Such criticism appears to be entirely ignorant of the purpose of drug regulatory agencies. It accepts that reports can be dismissed or discounted without any action being taken to investigate.

Even national drug regulators themselves state on their websites how important it is for patients to report adverse reactions - this taken from the UK's MHRA.

            “Data we gather from the Yellow Card Scheme are vital in our work to protect the public, by ensuring that drugs are used safely.  We need the data in order to continue identifying new side effects and ways in which the risks of recognised side effects can be minimised.  Every report we receive contains potentially useful information - without the reports, we simply would not be able to continue this important work."

        “Side effects reported on Yellow Cards are evaluated, together with additional sources of information such as clinical trial data, medical literature or data from international medicines regulators, to identify previously unknown safety issues. These reports are assessed by a team of medicine safety experts made up of doctors, pharmacists and scientists who study the benefits and risks of medicines. If a new side effect is identified, the safety profile of the medicine in question is carefully looked at, as well as the side effects of other medicines used to treat the same condition. The MHRA assesses the balance of risks and benefits of all medicines at the time of initial licensing and throughout their use in clinical practice..... The MHRA takes action, whenever necessary, to ensure that medicines are used in a way that minimises risk, while maximising patient benefit.”

Yet here we have supporters of pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines stating that reports of side effects are questionable, that it is okay for thousands of people to be killed by a vaccine, that there is no need to take action to protect patients.

So, not only have the pharmaceutical establishment taken control of national drug regulators, the whole purpose of drug regulation is being trashed by people who do not support the idea that patient should be safeguarded again drug and vaccine harm. 

And this is why reports of adverse reactions can be ignored, dismissed, discounted. There is no effective system for protecting patients who are harmed by pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines.

Why do people support Norwich City Football Club? Why do people refuse to get vaccinated? How the mainstream media resolves these questions

Journalism always tackles difficult social questions. We rely on them for information on important issues. In recent years mainstream media journalists have developed a novel way of resolving them. It's brilliant. Where, once, they would have thoroughly investigated the issue, and talked to all sides of the argument. But now they adopt quite a different approach.

Why do people support Norwich City Football Club? (Why do people refuse to get vaccinated?)

(Note. If a journalist bothered to ask me, I would say that I was born in Norwich, I lived there for the first 18 years of my life. So they may lose every week in the Premier League, sometimes quite agonisingly. But it's the place of my birth; and I followed their progress in the FA Cup in 1958 when, as a 3rd tier club they reached the semi-final.)

But in today's journalism, no journalist would bother to ask me. It might go something like this!

"So why do people support NCFC? To find out we have invited a Chelsea supporter to tell us."

...................

"Well, that is very interesting. But we wanted to investigate further. What will this Manchester United supporter tell us?

..................

Well, it seems fairly clear then - the team is just not very good, and the supporters are stupid. But let's ask this Liverpool supporter if he agrees with this.

..................

So for most modern journalists, working for the mainstream media, their investigation has made it quite clear that NCFC supporters have no good reason to support the club. This is what most football supporters believe. NCFC fans are not very bright, rather stupid, in fact. There is no good or logical reasons for people to support NCFC, especially when there are so many more fashionable teams to support, teams that win every week (and get very angry when they don't).

So what is the journalistic conclusion. NCFC fans, being as daft as they are, probably don't even get themselves vaccinated either. It is just plain stupidity on their part. 

And just to prove the point, without leaving any doubt, lets talk to this Arsenal supporter

................

Tomorrow, in this same programme, we will be asking the same question of Tottenham and Aston Villa fans.

And we will ask a very large group of conventional doctors and academics, all of whom support and profit from vaccines, why so many people wish to remain vaccine free, especially when we all know how safe and effective these new vaccines are, and how important it is for us all to get vaccinated.

And if we have time, we will also be asking why so many people use homeopathy for their medical treatment, when we all know that there is no scientific evidence to support it. So we will ask another large group of conventional medical doctors, and as many professors from universities with medical faculties paid for by the pharmaceutical industry, to tell us why this is the case.

The Failure of the Covid-19 Strategy, the Vaccines, and a system of medicine. Is it all the benefit of hindsight?

After two years of incessant conventional medical propaganda it is now becoming clear to an ever increasing number of people that public health measures such as face masks, and lockdowns, and the experimental Covid-19 vaccines, have been an abject failure.

The official Covid-19 narrative has been recited, ad nauseam, by government, conventional medical authorities, and the mainstream media throughout the world for over two years. The narrative is simply outlined.

• The Covid-19 virus is deadly.
• Everyone is at risk, no-one is safe.
  
• There is no treatment available.
• Government has a responsibility for our health and will keep us safe.
  
• Only a vaccine will save us, and return life back to normal.
• The new vaccines were amazingly effective; they would quickly contain the pandemic.
• The new vaccines were also entirely safe.
• Everyone should get the vaccine, for their own safety, and until we did we were at risk.
• Everyone should get the vaccine for other people's safety; it was a public duty.
  

For so many people, this narrative, repeated day after day, has been their only source of information about the Covid-19 virus; so whilst many people may now realise they have been duped, the sheer consistency of the propaganda means that no one can be blamed for believing it - apart, that is, from the messengers, governments around the world, conventional medical authorities, and the mainstream media. 

And now that the narrative is breaking down. It is breaking down because what is happening in the real world does not reflect what is happening in the narrative, in medical propaganda. So now, those who are responsible for that narrative are now having to find excuses for providing the general public with misinformation.

The excuses from government, conventional medical authorities, and the mainstream media, have begun. They know they have to justify the messages they have been giving us. And it is already clear that one excuse, "the benefit of hindsight" will be high up on their agenda.

It is probably best for those of us on the winning side, previously thought to be "the misinformed", or "the spreaders of misinformation", not to say "I told you so". But this blog was amongst the first blogs to accurately predict what was going to happen. If we take the first month of the official Covid-19 narrative to be January 2020 (it was actually earlier than this), this is what appeared on this blog.

January 2020.

The Coronavirus Panic. Just how dangerous is this new virus? The worldwide coronavirus panic is in full swing! I predicted in month one that the virus would not prove to be as serious as was being suggested. I said that homeopaths were already treating the virus, and working on identifying the remedies that were the most effective to patients who contracted the virus.

February 2020.

The Coronavirus Panic. What every sensible and informed person should be doing. In this blog I predicted that conventional medicine would be unable to prevent people contracting the virus, unable to treat it effectively, and that large numbers of people would die without treatment. Again, I outlined how homeopathy was working to protect people with simple remedies, but that conventional medicine would not offer their patients this treatment.

Conventional medicine is in a gigantic panic. So is enough being done to contain it? When it has nothing to offer, but refuses to embrace homeopathy? In this blog I highlighted how homeopathy had been used successfully in past epidemics, and what it was doing in the current epidemic. Yet conventional medicine was (and still is) allowing people to suffer and die with the virus, even when it admitted during this first year it had no effective treatment to offer.

Health Freedom and Patient Choice. This blog was my first response to increasing calls for mandatory drugging - this long before the Covid-19 vaccines had been developed, leave alone had a track record of any description.

March 2020

Does the Conventional Medical Establishment prefer patients to die rather than offer them Natural Medical Treatment? By the pandemic's third month the number of people dying of, or with the Covid-19 virus was increasing rapidly, and I asked why conventional medicine was not using every possible way of preventing this. The exaggeration of the seriousness of the virus was already plain - anyone who died within 28 days of testing positive - for whatever reason - was a Covid-19 death. 

We are just beginning to find out the extent of this deception. GB News recently confirmed figures, based on a Freedom of Information request from UK Office of National Statistics (17 January 2022). Only 9,400 people died OF the virus in 2020, and only 5,746 in first 9 months of 2021. The 150,000 figure of Covid-19 deaths includes those who died WITH the virus, but not OF the virus. This was a gross exaggeration of seriousness of pandemic, designed to create fear in the population.

April 2020

Covid-19. The important questions that are not being asked.  Even by month 4 this blog was asking pertinent questions about the so-called pandemic, including what (to me) is the key question - why was conventional medicine, which still had nothing to offer, was not taking the opportunity to emphasise the importance of natural immunity, and what people could do to support and strengthen their immune systems. 

In addition, I asked why the virus was mostly affecting 'developed' nations, that is, nations with well-funded pharmaceutical medical systems in operation. And it was also one of the first blog to question why 'lockdown' was considered to be a sensible policy.

Covid-19. Does Natural Medicine have an alternative? This was the first time I emphasised the importance of our natural immunity, and natural medicine. I stated, nearly two years ago, that if this was done it would prevent the unnecessary damage being caused by social distancing, and lockdown policies both to the economy, to social life, and the emotional damage it was doing to people lives.

And so the blog has continued for the next two years. My opposition to both the public health measures, and the experimental vaccines, used by conventional medicine in response to the Covid-19 pandemic were not made 'in hindsight'. They arose from an understanding of the ongoing failure of conventional medicine - which I then applied to what I could see happening 'on the ground" as a result of the Covid-19 panic. The pandemic was clearly no more than the repetition of so many previous examples of conventional medicine incompetence.

I had written my E-Book, "The Failure of Conventional Medicine" on the basis of the previous history of this medical system, notably its consistent and ongoing failure to treat illness and disease successfully. 

Over the weekend I took time to re-read this book (written originally in 2007). It provides a history of the past failures of conventional medicine, alongside a detailed explanation of why this drug-based system of medicine would continue to fail. What I realised was that it could equally be used as a predictor of future failure. It is a far better explanation for what is happening to our health, and why levels of public sickness has been increasing rapidly, year by year, especially during the last 70-100 years, than any explanation coming from the conventional medical establishment!

So for anyone who is as horrified abour what has happened over the last two years should perhaps take some time to read "The Failure of Conventional Medicine". It will explain much about what has happened during the last two years - even though it was first written 15 years ago. Writing the E-Book has cost me much time, and a little money - but it is entirely free for anyone to read. It was written to inform, to enlighten, to educate, not to produce profit. 

For anyone with an open enquiring mind, reading the book can alter your view about health, it can explain why conventional medicine is now dominated by the drug industry, and the consequences to our health of that domination. For anyone who wishes to escape the clutches of pharmaceutical medicine this can be the first step to a more healthy life.

 

Why do so many people wish to remain Vaccine Free?

I am not an "anti-vaxxer. I am one of thousands who wish to remain "vaccine free". And there is an important distinction between the two description. The former is negative. The latter is positive - I have good reasons for not wanting to take a vaccine, any vaccine.

If you genuinely want to know the difference this blog will provide my answer.

First, and most important - I have an immune system, which I have spent my life (most of it anyway) supporting and strengthening - because ultimately this is what I believe keeps all of us getting sick.

We all have an immune system. We have understood this since Ancient Greek times. The strength of our immune system is the criteria we should use to determine our personal susceptibility to illness and disease, and certainly not our vaccine status!

We are all born with an innate immune system. And as we come into contact with foreign bacteria and viruses - germs - it works to protect us; it learns how to do this; so on top of our innate immune system there is built acquired immunity. Together these are often referred to as natural immunity.

Yet as we each live our lives, we can do things that can undermine and compromise our natural immunity. Once our biggest problem was living in poverty, with malnutrition, in squalid and insanitary housing. Now it is more about poor diet and nutrition, lack of exercise, and life-style choices that puts pressure on our immune system, and will eventually compromise, and undermine it.

However, we can all do things that support and strengthen our immune systems - good diet and nutrition, a sensible exercise regime, and positive life-style choices.

So how strong is your immunity? One rule of thumb I often use is to ask the question - how susceptible are you to catching every cold, cough, infection that is going around? 

• If your answer is “rarely” - then your immune system is strong; it is protecting you. 
• If your answer is “always” then your immune system has been compromised.

Either way we can all do things to protect ourselves from illness: live our lives, and making life-style choices, that will actually support and strengthen our natural immunity.

So when we are confronted with a bug, the threat to our health depends to a large degree on the ability of our natural immunity to cope with it. And this ability depends largely on ourselves: not on pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines. Moreover, this can explain what is happening to each of us when faced with infectious disease - including Covid-19.

Some people, with a strong immune system, will not know that they have faced a threat to health, or that our immune system has coped with it.

Others, with slightly weaker immunity, will get ill; the ability of the individual to cope with the illness, recover better or quicker will depend upon the remaining strength of our natural immunity.

• Those with heavily compromised immunity will suffer most, they will become seriously ill, struggle to recover, and many will die.

Infectious disease has always done this. The fittest survive, the weakest die. It happened with the Black Death in the 14th century; with the Great Plague of the 1660'2; with Spanish flu in 1918-19; and with every other epidemic known to humanity.

It’s only in recent years, not least with the Covid-19 pandemic, that another ‘understanding’ has arisen, one emanating from the pharmaceutical medical establishment. I have written about it here.

https://safe-medicine.blogspot.com/2021/10/the-immune-system-misinformation-and.html

We should all be aware that this is an attempt by the pharmaceutical medical establishment to ‘re-educate’ us about natural immunity - that our immune systems are no longer protective, that only 'vaccine immunity', an artificial immunity, will keep us safe from infections.

This idea certainly sells vaccines; but it is not how the our bodies work, or how they have ever worked!

• Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic we have been told that there is no natural immunity, that only vaccines, and vaccine immunity, will save us from Covid-19.
• And even then, that vaccines cannot save us unless everyone is vaccinated (herd immunity, and other similar nonsense arguments).

Then, after people get vaccinated, more questions about immunity are asked, quite understandably. Who will suffer side effects from the vaccines? Which side effects? How severe are the adverse reactions of the vaccine likely to be?

The answer is exactly the same: those with strong natural immunity will suffer less than those with a weakened or compromised immune system. The immune system will always seek to protect us, even against vaccines injected into our blood stream, and it will always do so - if it is sufficiently strong.

The problem with this is that it is not what the conventional medical establishment have been telling us. From the very outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic we could have all been told about how best to support and strengthen our natural immunity; but this strategy does NOT sell vaccines. And buying some fruit, rich in vitamin C, is of no financial value to the pharmaceutical companies.

Yet something important now needs to be added to this process. The history of our health over the last 70-100 years has been that our rapidly increasing consumption of pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines has actually undermined and compromised our natural immune systems. Just as smoking, fast food, sedentary lifestyles, obesity, and recreational drugs, they have overloaded our immune systems with toxicity. 

As more toxic drugs and vaccines are added the immune system will initially struggle to cope with it, and eventually it will be overcome - to the cost of our health. There is increasing evidence, rarely reported to the general public, that natural immunity protects better against infections, including Covid-19, than vaccines.

https://dailysceptic.org/2021/12/15/danish-study-confirms-that-natural-immunity-protects-better-against-infection-than-the-vaccines/

There are 144 research studies that have demonstrated that natural immunity to Covid-19 is superior to vaccine immunity.

https://brownstone.org/articles/79-research-studies-affirm-naturally-acquired-immunity-to-covid-19-documented-linked-and-quoted/

Second, one of the most important ways of supporting and strengthening personal immunity from infection and illness is to stay clear of pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines.

All pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines can cause serious health problems. Conventional medicine call them ‘side effects’, often ‘adverse drug reactions’; but I call them DIE’s - or Disease-Inducing-Effects - they are that serious. This is why I now have nothing to do with conventional medicine, as I am not prepared to play a game of Russian Roulette with side effects that can ruin my health!

The Covid-19 vaccines are proving to be one of the most dangerous vaccines ever produced. The evidence of patient harm is coming through official channels, via national drug regulators, and patients reporting the harm that has been done to their health after taking the vaccines. I will provide you with the data from some of the official websites, and some assessments of this data  made by small independent news agencies.

Official Statistics on Adverse Vaccine Reactions

** The situation in the UK - official statistics from the Drug Regulator

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting#annex-1-vaccine-analysis-print

(Note, if you read this, how the UK drug regulator heavily discounts the serious adverse vaccine reactions being caused when their primary function should be to protect patients from harmful drugs).

** A summary of these UK statistics, taken from the UK government website.

https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports

** Vaccine Safety Update.

https://dailysceptic.org/2021/12/18/vaccine-safety-update-21/

** An assessment of the situation in the USA, from official VAERS statistics.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-cdc-covid-vaccine-pfizer-moderna-johnson/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=daa9f6a6-5cb8-4e4c-9385-d04231fb11cc

** Another assessment of the situation in the USA.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/20000-deaths-reported-to-vaers-following-covid-vaccines/

** Study in 145 countries shows sharp increase in transmission of virus and death since vaccines introduced

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/massive-145-country-study-shows-sharp-increase-transmission-death-introduction-covid-vaccines/

** Two Pfizer documents that informs us about the safety of their Covid19 vaccine.

https://safe-medicine.blogspot.com/2021/12/covid-19-vaccines-allow-pfizer-to-tell.html

** Europe. European Medicines Agency report 36,257 deaths: an “adverse Covid-19 vaccine reaction”!

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/36257-deaths-and-3244052-injuries-following-covid-shots-in-european-database-double-vaxxed-13-year-old-dies-from-heart-attack/

** Sharyl Attkisson. A summary of all concerns about adverse reactions to the vaccines

https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/11/exclusive-summary-covid-19-vaccine-concerns/#Summary-by-safety-concern

** The treatment was worse than the virus

https://thetruthiswhere.wordpress.com/2021/07/18/official-data-shows-twice-as-many-people-have-died-due-to-the-covid-19-vaccines-in-6-months-than-people-who-have-died-of-covid-19-in-15-months/

If you were not aware of the size of this problem, then ask yourself why - why is it that governments, medical authorities, and the mainstream media have not told you about any of this?

One vaccine, the AstraZeneca vaccine, has been suspended (=banned) in many countries around the world.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/15/which-countries-have-halted-use-of-astrazenecas-covid-vaccinehttps://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-booster-immune-system-fatigue/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=ddfcdbac-ec58-435b-91ee-8c3c6cfd3156

The same vaccine was never approved in the USA, yet has been widely used in Britain.

Third, the Covid-19 Vaccines have proven to be ineffective. People have been given the vaccine, risking serious adverse reactions, and the virus continues much as before the mass vaccination programme began.

** The vaccines do not prevent the the vaccinated contracting the virus!

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-number-reported-covid-cases-climb-fully-vaccinated/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=04efec71-8531-42cd-8bae-818ea0502083

** Double vaccinated have double the infection rate: data from Iceland (a heavily vaccinated nation)

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/01/09/double-vaccinated-have-double-the-infection-rate-data-from-iceland-shows/

** The boosters don’t work, medical authorities confirm evidence they are failing

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/eu-regulators-who-end-covid-boosters/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=b5be3851-e217-4fa4-afa8-e0ddac5c9bfd

Fourth, the Vaccinated continue to spread the virus

** Vaccination actually increases risk of spreading the virus

https://dailysceptic.org/2021/10/28/new-lancet-study-from-sweden-shows-vaccine-effectiveness-against-infection-dropping-to-zero-and-sharp-decline-against-severe-disease-as-well/

Hospitalisations and Deaths amongst the Vaccinated Population

** Deaths caused by the vaccines are now mainly amongst the vaccinated population

https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/18/triple-vaccinated-account-4-in-5-covid-deaths/

** Deaths, hospitalisations, highest in the most highly vaccinated countries

https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/06/highest-risk-of-covid-19-death-is-in-the-most-vaccinated-nations/

Fifth, the impact the Covid-19 vaccines have had on Children and Young People. The mass vaccination programmes now include children and young people - despite the fact that they were largely unaffected by the virus. They, too, have suffered the consequences.

** Deaths of children caused by the vaccines

https://thewhiterose.uk/85-of-covid-deaths-are-among-the-vaccinated-child-deaths-have-risen-by-83-since-they-were-offered-the-jab/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=the-latest-news-from-our-blog_11

** Increase in child deaths since vaccine rollout

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/uk-sees-44-increase-in-child-deaths-after-jab-rollout-for-young-teens-data-shows/

** Evidence of childhood deaths following vaccination

https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/17/57-percent-increase-in-deaths-among-young-girls-over-12-since-covid-vaccine-roll-out/

** Scientists & MP’s tell Government: end Covid-19 vaccination of children: risk outweigh benefits

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/01/08/end-covid-vaccination-of-children-because-the-risks-outweigh-the-benefits-government-told-by-mps-and-scientists/

** Children at risk for lifelong health problems from Covid-19 vaccine

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/children-risk-lifelong-health-problems-covid-vaccine/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=ddfcdbac-ec58-435b-91ee-8c3c6cfd3156

** Covid-19 vaccines more responsible for child deaths than virus

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/covid-jabs-may-be-more-responsible-for-child-deaths-than-the-virus-data-suggests/

 Sixth, the impact on women, especially pregnant women, perhaps the most vulnerable of all. There is now clear evidence that the Covid-19 Vaccines are not safe for them to take - despite what they have been told.

** New study reveals Covid-19 vaccine terminates 4 out of 5 pregnancies; spontaneous abortions

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33882218/

** Miscarriages have been increased by the Covid-19 Vaccines

https://www.wddty.com/news/covid-vaccine-doubles-chances-of-miscarriage/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=wddty&utm_content=Covid+vaccine+doubles+chances+of+miscarriage&utm_campaign=FREE+MEMBERS+enews+-+%28Covid+vaccine+doubles+chances+of+miscarriage%29+16.11.2021&gr_s=BvO&gr_m=Ge&gr_x=a62e

3,147 fetal deaths in USA following Covid-19 injections in pregnant and child-bearing age women.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/thousands-of-miscarriages-following-covid-19-injections-reported-in-vaers-are-being-censored-as-an-entire-generation-is-being-sterilized/

Seventh, Sports Persons - the impact on fit and healthy people following vaccination - perhaps one group you might imagine would be most resistant to the harm caused by the vaccines.

** The surge in deaths of fit, healthy sportspeople following vaccination

https://thewhiterose.uk/341-athlete-cardiac-arrests-194-dead-after-covid-shot/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=the-latest-news-from-our-blog_11

** 2021 epidemic of heart issues in athletes

https://airtable.com/shrbaT4x8LG8EbvVG/tbl7xKsSUIOPAa7Mx

Eighth, one of the most concerning adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines is that they are now thought to be causing damage to our immune system.

** Official UK government data proves booster Covid-19 vaccines destroy innate immune system

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/13/covid-boosters-destroy-immune-system-causing-ade/

** Covid boosters may cause immune system fatigue, compromise ability to fight viruses

https://nationalfile.com//new-york-times-covid-boosters-may-cause-immune-system-fatigue-compromise-ability-fight-virus/

Fully vaccinated people developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

https://thewhiterose.uk/fully-vaccinated-brits-developing-aids/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=the-latest-news-from-our-blog_11

** Official German government data suggests fully vaccinated will develop Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/02/german-gov-data-suggests-fully-vaccinated-developing-ade/

Conclusion. None of this is what we have been told, what we have heard from government, conventional medical authorities, and the mainstream media. So you might be sceptical. You might even think that this is ‘misinformation’ - which is how it has been summarily dismissed for the last two years.

But information is not ‘disinformation’ because the government, or the mainstream media, calls it disinformation! In a democracy we always have to be careful about government information, especially when the official Covid-19 narrative for the last two years has been a message emanating from the pharmaceutical industry - who stand to gain most from the mass vaccination campaigns. 

The drug industry is now so powerful that it can controls politicians and governments, it owns most of the mainstream media, and it dominates medical authorities around the world, including drug regulators, the authorities who should be acting to protect patients from dangerous drugs and vaccines.

My rule of thumb, when presented with any information, is to ascertain whether what I am being told makes sense of what is happening on the ground - so this is what I urge you to do.

In addition, have a look at what the Insurance Industry is now telling us about Covid-19 Vaccines

** Life Insurance data proves vaccinated more likely to die than Unvaccinated

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/09/life-insurance-data-proves-vaccinated-more-likely-to-die/

** Insurance companies report increased premature deaths since Covid-19 vaccines rollout

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/insurance-companies-report-increase-premature-deaths/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=f9464c47-e2ff-4ee5-8f35-ca3143d27920

Then read about what senior doctors around the world are now admitting - that the Covid-19 strategy, based on face masks, social distancing, test and trace, lockdown, and vaccines, has not worked.

** Leading Israeli immunologist says “It’s time to admit failure”.

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/01/12/treat-covid-like-the-common-cold-says-the-wellcome-trust-as-leading-israeli-immunologist-blasts-lockdown-consensus-its-time-to-admit-failure/

** “There’s something awful happening”

https://thewhiterose.uk/dr-mike-yeadon-theres-something-awful-happening/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=the-latest-news-from-our-blog_11

** CDC Director says Covid-19 policies have failed and must be abandoned.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-director-covid-policies-failed/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=d8800cb1-6ca8-45e1-9766-b37231ff4113

** ”It’s time to admit failure” - Israeli Microbiologist and Immunologist

https://swprs.org/professor-ehud-qimron-ministry-of-health-its-time-to-admit-failure/

So, for one, I am pleased to remain vaccine free. I have gone one stage further by using natural medical therapy rather the conventional medicine - because it is much safer, and more effective. Throughout the pandemic, indeed for the last 30 to 40 years I have used homeopathy both to prevent influenza, and to treat other medical conditions that I have had over the years.

This is why I am passionate about health freedom. Individual Freedom and Personal Liberty are principles mankind has been fighting for now for millennia. Those of us who live in democracies like to believe that we have freedom, that we are at liberty to lead our lives doing what we want to do - as long as this does not infringe upon the freedoms of other people.

Please understand - people have fought, long and hard, for health freedom.

https://safe-medicine.blogspot.com/2021/10/mandatory-vaccination-or-forced.html

And in accepting health passports, and mandated drugging is a threat to health freedom, perhaps the most fundamental freedom of all. It is alarming how easily so many people have been prepared to give it up, to accept that their government, and a medical system, should be allowed to dictate what we can, and cannot do with our body.

We have been bombarded for two years with constant publicity about the Covid-19 virus and the Covid-19 vaccines. Our government has told us, through the mainstream media, and conventional medical authorities, that these vaccines are safe and effective. Perhaps they do actually do believe this. Yet so many people seem prepared to allow the government, aided and abetted by the pharmaceutical industry, to force (mandate) them.

Forcing these vaccines on people who wish to remain vaccine free is a serious breach of our individual freedom and personal liberty.

I want you to understand this. I do not want the vaccine. This is my personal decision. It is based on many factors, but notably that the vaccines are proving to be dangerous, as well as ineffective.

Other people may disagree; within a democracy people have a right to do so; anyone can take the vaccine if this is their wish. But no government is entitled to force anyone to have any vaccine. We must all beware!

• First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a socialist.
• Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.
• Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
• Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

If we allow the pharmaceutical companies to get away with forced drugging now, soon other vaccines, and other pharmaceutical drugs will be forced on us.

Osteoporosis. A new drug available: but is it safe? Romosozumab (Everity)

There is some controversy about a new pharmaceutical drug to treat osteoporosis in post-menopausal women at high risk of fracture. It is called Romosozumab or Everity.

According to this MIMS article, some doctors in England the Wales are calling on NICE to reverse the decision not to approve this new drug, which is already approved in Northern Ireland and Scotland. It is, apparently, the first new osteoporosis drug  to come to the market in over ten years.

So what is wrong with the drug? Why has NICE not approved the drug for use?

This is what the Drugs.com website tells us about the adverse drug reactions it is known to cause.

"Warning:

* Potential Risk of Myocardial Infarction, Stroke and Cardiovascular Death. 

* Romosozumab-aqqg may increase the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death.

* Romosozumab-aqqg should not be initiated in patients who have had a myocardial infarction or stroke within the preceding year.

* Consider whether the benefits outweigh the risks in patients with other cardiovascular risk factors.

If a patient experiences a myocardial infarction or stroke during therapy, romosozumab-aqqg should be discontinued."

So why do these doctors disagree with the NICE decision, and want to use the new drug with their patients?

It can only be assumed that these doctors do not mind giving their patients drugs that cause heart disease, and death. Perhaps they have nothing better to offer, and that anything is better than nothing.

Whatever, it certainly demonstrates that the precautionary principle, and the Hippocratic oath, "first do no harm", is something that these conventional medical doctors do not understand.

And I expect you thought that doctors have your best interests at heart?

So for those post-menopausal women, suffering with osteoporosis, and in danger of broken bones, it might be a good time to compare homeopathic treatment with the pharmaceutical drugs on offer from their doctors.