I have been suggesting that Dementia is linked to increased drug taking in the last 80+ years for nearly twenty years. This is my blog from 2013. As with all iatrogenic (doctor-induced) disease, the conventional medical establishment has always vehemently denied and discounted it. Their drugs and vaccines are (of course) “safe and effective”, and medicine is committed to “first, do no harm”. And it’s very survival depends on people believing this.
This is a difficult position for conventional medicine to maintain, given that the ‘side effects’ (adverse reactions) to their drugs and vaccines have to be published - although this is limited to the ‘side effects’ that are proven and admitted by the pharmaceutical industry.
Yet some honesty seems to be creeping into what conventional medicine is prepared to accept about the patient harm that it causes. I recently read this Medscape article, “Is Alzheimer’s Disease transmissable. Inside the evidence for ‘Iatrogenic’ AD”. Medscape is, of course, very much part of the conventional medical establishment, which does not normally admit such as thing.
“But a small and growing body of evidence suggests that, in rare circumstances, amyloid-beta pathology associated with AD - and possible AD itself - may be transmitted from one person to another through certain medical procedures including childhood injections of cadaver-derived growth hormone (c-hGH), dura mater grafts, and renewed neurosurgical instruments”
And the article goes on to ask “what evidence supports the existence of iatrogenic AD” and details the evidence that supports the link with cadaver-derived growth hormone (c-hGH), dura mater grafts, renewed neurosurgical instruments, and also blood transfusions. Two questions emerge from this.
First, this article was published a couple of weeks ago, and refers to information that has been known for much longer. Why is such information not made available publicly (short of subscribing to small specialist journals like Medscape)?
And secondly, more importantly, why does the Conventional Medical Establishment not look into their published evidence that clearly shows that most pharmaceutical drugs, including many of the most widely prescribed, are known to cause the symptoms of dementia?
I have listed many of these prescription drugs that can be linked with Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia my e-book, here, “Iatrogenic Disease. The “Disease Inducing Effects” (DIE’s) of Pharmaceutical Drugs and Vaccines”.
 |
The evidence, their own evidence, links pharma drugs with dementia is far more convincing way - the only way that goes close to explaining the 80 year old dementia epidemic. Yet link between pharmaceutical ‘side effects’ and all serious illnesses and diseases, including dementia - but is rarely discussed in conventional medical literature - perhaps for obvious reasons.
So if the Conventional Medical Establishment feels unable openly and transparently to investigate the link between pharmaceutical drugs and dementia, we ‘ordinary’ folk should certainly be doing so. After all, if the medical profession is failing to do so, it is in our own interests to protect ourselves from the dreadful outcome of prescription drug taking.
