Search This Blog

Thursday 19 March 2020

Coronavirus. Does Conventional Medical Establishment prefer patients to die rather than offer them Natural Medical Treatment?

Does Conventional Medicine prefer patients to die rather than admit THEY have no effective treatment, especially when natural medicine does? The coronavirus epidemic is a case in point. Doctors, and other medical 'experts' when interviewed by the media, insist there is no treatment; and that prevention is about washing our hands, voluntary isolation, and compulsory quarantine.

At the time of writing (18th March 2020) there is a reported 8,423 people who have died, worldwide, as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic. It is anticipated that this figure will rise much higher, and there seems to be general acceptance that they have died because there is 'no treatment' for the disease.

In addition, there is widespread political acceptance that as a result of there being no effective treatment, national economies have to be shut down in order to prevent the spread of the virus. A worldwide recession is now imminent as a direct result of a pandemic - for which there is no treatment.

Together, this is a huge cost to pay; yet governments around the world are demonstrating that they are quite willing to pay this cost, and that there is no alternative to doing so. And most people appear to be willing to accept what they are being told - that many will die, lose their jobs, and will face serious social disruption; that companies and whole industries will fail, and the national economy will be devastated.

Yet there is an alternative explanation for what is happening, albeit an explanation that no-one is hearing - because it is not being told.

The conventional medical establishment is huge. It is dominated by the enormously wealthy and  powerful pharmaceutical industry which uses uses its influence to control not only national medical services, but politicians, governments, and the mainstream media. Could this powerful vested interest be withholding and denying information about the alternative medical choices that are available?

Most people do not realise just how influential, dominant and powerful the conventional medical establishment is, that it is capable of denying vital information about health, and patient choice.

So what are the natural and alternative treatments for coronavirus we are not hearing about? Here are just a few of them.

1. Vitamin C, or Ascorbic Acid. This is being used widely in China, the original source of the epidemic, and in countries like Korea, which has been badly hit.

The Chinese epidemic was intense, but is now virtually stopped. This slow down has been rapid, and has been described in this article in the Jerusalem Post by Israeli Nobel Prize winner, Michael Levitt.

               “The rate of infection of the virus in the Hubei province increased by 30% each day - that is a scary statistic. I am not an influenza expert but I can analyze numbers and that is exponential growth. Had the growth continued at that rate, the whole world would have become infected within 90 days." But as Levitt continued to process the numbers, the pattern changed. On February 1, when he first looked at the statistics, Hubei Province had 1,800 new cases a day. By February 6, that number had reached 4,700 new cases a day. But on February 7, something changed. “The number of new infections started to drop linearly and did not stop. "A week later, the same happened with the number of the deaths.

So what has caused this slow down? Allow the Chinese government (with all its many faults in the eyes of the western world) to tell us. It has announced its official recommentation that COVID-19 should be treated with high amounts of intravenous vitamin C.

          "On the afternoon of February 20, 2020, another 4 patients with severe new coronaviral pneumonia recovered from the C10 West Ward of Tongji Hospital. In the past 8 patients have been discharged from hospital. . . High-dose vitamin C achieved good results in clinical applications. We believe that for patients with severe neonatal pneumonia and critically ill patients, vitamin C treatment should be initiated as soon as possible after admission. . . Early application of large doses of vitamin C can have a strong antioxidant effect, reduce inflammatory responses, and improve endothelial function. . . Numerous studies have shown that the dose of vitamin C has a lot to do with the effect of treatment. . . High-dose vitamin C can not only improve antiviral levels, but more importantly, can prevent and treat acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress."

So why have we not been told about this? Why are we, in the 'advanced' west, not being encouraged to use vitamin C? Why are people being allowed to die with any mention, any use, or even any examination into these claims?

2. Homeopathy is being used within the Indian medical system, and in other countries too, such as Cuba

India is a huge country. In the eyes of many people in the western world, India is not an 'advanced' country, with an 'advanced' medical system. Indeed, it is too often denigrated as being poor and backward. So if the coronavirus death toll in China is 3,122, in Italy 2,503, in Iran 1,335, in Spain 623, in the UK 71, the death rate in India must be huge. Well, actually it is just 3.

So why have we not been told? Why are we, in the 'advanced' west, not using homeopathy? Why are people being allowed to die without any mention, any use, any examination into the value of homeopathy, and its claims for the effectiveness of many remedies that are known to be able to both prevent, and treat these viral epidemics?

Moreover, the use of homeopathy is simple, inexpensive and effective. There are many detailed articles on the internet at the moment about the homeopathic treatment of this coronavirus pandemic. For example, this one focuses on prevention; this one on treatment. Local homeopaths throughout the world will advise on remedies that will be helpful to you.

3. Hair Dryers and Hot Water
There are, however, many other treatments that are being discussed, outside the confines of the conventional medical establishment. I have selected this one, the use of Hair Dryers. Heat kills viruses, and today I saw this message from a homeopath, Chuck Solomon (who has asked that everyone passes it on).

               "The Coronavirus and many other pathogens are easily KILLED BY WARM AIR from your hair dryer. The virus simply falls apart from exposure to a little heat. These viruses start a colony and live only in the cooler areas just inside your nose and the fore part of your sinus. Your breathing keeps these area's cooler, as the virus prefers, rather than deeper area's of the body.

               "So here's what to do: cool your face and outside of your nose with a spray or splash of water. Select the lowest warm temperature on your hair dryer and carefully blow some warm air into your nose and breathe it in. Do this for about 5 minutes, occasionally moving the hair dryer aside if it gets too hot. Air temperature of 133 degrees Fahrenheit (56 degrees Celsius), or warmer, will cause the virus cell-wall to break down so the virus dies. Use the air temp as warm as you can comfortably tolerate it. Repeat the heat treatment a couple of times a day to prevent infection by coronavirus, many other viruses and colds. If you start to feel like you are catching something, repeat the treatment 5 times per day.

There has been wall-to-wall coverage of coronvirus for weeks now. So why have we not been told about these treatments? Do they work? Why are people being allowed to die with any mention, any use, any examination of its value in treating viral outbreaks?

When I mentioned this to a homeopath-colleague she said that this is what our mothers and grandmothers did, getting a flu sufferer to breathe over a bowl of steaming hot water, with a towel covering the head. I had not made the connection, but this is exactly what my mother did for me.

Perhaps it is too much of an "old wives tale", lacking the imagination, wizardry and sophistication of modern pharmaceutical medicine. Except that it has shown no imagination, wizardry or sophistication in the treatment of this pandemic? Instead, perhaps, it signifies just how far we have regressed in medical know-how during the last 100 years of conventional medicine's domination.

The Body Healing Itself - Conventional Medicine stopping it
A fever is the body's natural means of killing viruses. Even conventional doctors occasionally acknowledge this. A fever is what our body does to overcome a viral attack.

So what does conventional medicine do? It seeks to reduce or stop fever, it works to prevent the body's natural response to viral attacks. Doing so is known to be seriously counter-productive. Even parts of the conventional medical establishment realise this. The World Health Organization has backed calls to avoid ibuprofen for coronavirus. Yet there are other parts of the conventional medical establishment that disagrees. And conventional doctors, it seems, have had to be reminded that it is "sensible to avoid ibuprofen for coronavirus" presumably because many of them did not know.

What this demonstrates is that pharmaceutical medicine is all over the place. It does not know what it's doing. During the Spanish flu outbreak in 1918 it did not know what it was doing, and many accounts are clear - it was the pharmaceutical drugs used then that probably killed more people then the flu itself. 100 years on it still has little to offer, except panic.

Yet conventional medicine does NOT want us to know that there are other ways of preventing and treating this coronavirus epidemic.

There are many other means of preventing and treating epidemics like Coronavirus COVID-19, some of them are very simple indeed, simplistic even. This article, for instance, At-Home Wellness Guide to Staying Healthy During COVID-19, describes just 5 of them - keeping it simple, eating healthy, drinking water, taking a walk, getting enough sleep.

So for weeks now the mainstream media has talked of little else other than the coronavirus pandemic, in panic mood. Yet it has done little to support these simple treatments, leave alone suggest that vitamins, and natural medicine might be able to help.
  • Should they be tried?
  • Should we meekly accept what conventional medicine tells us - that there is 'no alternative'?
  • Should they be discussed?
  • Should we get to know about them?
  • Should they be subject to trials and studies?
  • Should we have the right to choose how we are treated, based on full and proper information?
Certainly, when we are told that there is no treatment it means nothing more than that there is no CONVENTIONAL medical treatment. The treatments that are available are not profitable. And if they work they will inform too many people - that pharmaceutical medicine does not work, has not answers - but nutrition, natural health therapies, and even "old wives tales" are more helpful.

So people are dying in their thousands around the world - without any knowledge of vitamin C, or homeopathy, hair dryers, or inhaling steaming hot water. National economies are being jeopardised.

And conventional medicine would prefer this to admitting that there are non-conventional treatments. They are they scared that people might realise just how bare their medical cupboard is, and discover that other cupboards exist that are full of potentially effective treatments.

In other words, they would rather we died!