"40 deaths linked to child vaccines over seven years".
"Childhood vaccinations are suspected to have left two children with brain injuries and caused 1,500 other neurological reactions. These include 11 cases of inflammation of the brain, 13 cases of epilepsy, and a coma."
This information comes from The Times, once one the most respected British newspapers, relied upon by the Establishment, presumably because it could be relied upon to be an honest and trustworthy source of news. Indeed, the article says that the data itself came from a reputable source within the conventional medical establishment, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (MHRA), following a request by The Sunday Times under the Freedom of Information Act. So what might emanate from this information?
Perhaps doctors haven't caught up with this information yet. Perhaps those who attack anti-vaxxers haven't heard about this information. Perhaps now, at last, the mainstream media will begin to recognise that there IS a need properly and openly, to discuss vaccine safety.
The problem with such hope and expectation is that this information comes from a Times article of 24th October 2010!
The same information was published here, and here by WDDTY, on this blog, on this 'Vaccine Risk Awareness' website, so the information was well publicised at the time.
"Childhood vaccinations are suspected to have left two children with brain injuries and caused 1,500 other neurological reactions. These include 11 cases of inflammation of the brain, 13 cases of epilepsy, and a coma."
This information comes from The Times, once one the most respected British newspapers, relied upon by the Establishment, presumably because it could be relied upon to be an honest and trustworthy source of news. Indeed, the article says that the data itself came from a reputable source within the conventional medical establishment, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (MHRA), following a request by The Sunday Times under the Freedom of Information Act. So what might emanate from this information?
- How will this affect the attitude of conventional medicine towards 'anti-vaxxers', like myself, who are being heavily criticised for doubting the safety of vaccines?
- How will it affect NHS doctors, who routinely inform their patients that vaccines are safe, and regularly pressurise us to get vaccinated, and to vaccinate our children?
Perhaps doctors haven't caught up with this information yet. Perhaps those who attack anti-vaxxers haven't heard about this information. Perhaps now, at last, the mainstream media will begin to recognise that there IS a need properly and openly, to discuss vaccine safety.
The problem with such hope and expectation is that this information comes from a Times article of 24th October 2010!
The same information was published here, and here by WDDTY, on this blog, on this 'Vaccine Risk Awareness' website, so the information was well publicised at the time.
- Yet nothing has happened.
- We are still being told that vaccines are safe.
- No mention is made of this information when telling us that vaccines are safe.
- Those who say that vaccines are not safe are dismissed as anti-vaxxers, a danger to public health!
So let's go back even further, to 13th February 2006, and an article in the Telegraph, "Secret report reveals 18 child deaths following vaccinations". This reported that
"Eighteen babies and toddlers have died following childhood vaccinations in just four years, a secret Government report reveals. Four deaths have been linked to suspected adverse reactions to the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) triple jab, according to documents prepared for the Government's expert advisers on immunisation." (My emphasis).
- Yet nothing has happened.
- We are still being told that vaccines are safe.
- No mention is made of this information when telling us that vaccines are safe.
- Those who say that vaccines are not safe are dismissed as anti-vaxxers, a danger to public health!
Going back to 2006 reminds me that conventional medicine always blames all this 'anti-vaccine' stuff on Dr Andrew Wakefield. These reports, 'secret' as one may have been, have absolutely nothing to do with him!
So what has changed? Have the vaccines changed? Have they not caused further damage to patients since 2006, or 2010?
OR HAS THIS EVIDENCE JUST BEEN CONVENIENTLY IGNORED
BY THE CONVENTIONAL MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT .....
- ignored in the interests of the future profitability of the pharmaceutical industry?
- ignored to safeguard the reputation of the conventional medical profession?
- and all achieved with the willing connivance of politicians, governments, the conventional medical profession, and the mainstream media?
