The conventional medical establishment is in trouble. It is struggling because its drugs and vaccines do not work, the population is getting sicker, chronic diseases of every kind are rising exponentially, to and beyond epidemic proportions, and it has no response to acute infections. All this is being highlighted by its inability to cope with the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic, and the nonsense policies that are damaging our social, economic and now our political lives.
So conventional medicine is in a state of panic. It has nothing positive to offer us. Yet it desperately wants to preserve its dominant and profitable role within national health services around the world.
The rise of an alternative medical science may not be grabbing the headlines in the mainstream media (MSM), mainly because MSM headlines are controlled by a pharmaceutical-controlled media. But this alternative science is on the rise, and as conventional medicine fails, its voice will become louder, for all to hear.
So the conventional medical establishment, through the governments and MSM that it controls, is resorting to ever more desperate measures. This includes political repression (supposedly to protect us from the pandemic), and media censorship - which together means that few people will have heard the news from Denmark.
The new laws proposed by the Danish government would have enabled it to implement authoritarian restrictions in the event of future pandemics. For example, the laws would have given it authority to forcibly hospitalise people diagnosed with an infection, there to be isolate, treate and vaccinate them. So draconian were these power, even the Danish Medical Association responded by stating they went too far, and that compulsory vaccination should only be used as a last resort. The Danish people protested for 9 days against the legislation (surely something that our MSM might have told us were it free to do so), and eventually the proposed legislation was defeated.
It is likely that the people of most countries in Europe will have to do likewise in the weeks and months to come - to fight for our political liberty, and hard-won freedoms.
It is clear from what has happened during recent weeks that there is a world-wide attack on patient choice and health freedom, best witnessed by moves against what is known as 'vaccine hesitancy'.
Vaccine hesitancy arises from patient choice. But this is not how the conventional medical establishment sees it. Vaccines are the great hope, their only hope, for getting the COVID-19 pandemic under control. So for them hesitancy is not about choice - it is about 'misinformation'. The MSM are already on board with this message, and have been for many years; so the ring of control has to be tightened further. People must not have access to misinformation, or more accurately, to information 'they' do not wish us to have.
So governments around the world, led and guided by the pharmaceutical industry, are engaging with social media companies to limit the spread of this disinformation, and help the the 'misguided' to find proper (that is ‘approved’) information about the new vaccines. So, for instance, on my Facebook page, now appears this text, each time I log into it.
This Page posts about vaccines.When it comes to health, everyone wants reliable, up-to-date information. Visit the National Health Service's website. The website has information that can help answer questions you may have about vaccines.
At the moment I can get rid of it. But other, larger, more influential websites, can no longer publish on social media. Twitter, for example, will not allow any Dr Mercola article to be tweeted. Similarly Facebook censors any link to the Natural News website.
Governments want social media companies to go much further, to remove ‘misinformation’ more quickly, and promote 'authoritative' (government controlled, pharmaceutically approved) messages. According to some reports the UK government is even involving GCHQ (the Government Communications Headquarters) in taking out 'anti-vaxxers' online, and on social media platforms. This is how Children's Health Defense has described what is happening.
"The mainstream media has exploded in recent weeks with calls for punitive action for anyone who expresses any doubts about the fast-tracked ‘saviour’ covid-19 vaccines. Following announcements by the UK Government of its plans to combat vaccine hesitancy, the UK Labour Party called for emergency legislation to be implemented to “stamp out” what it calls dangerous anti-vax misinformation. In the US, the American Medical Association has adopted a policy designed to educate doctors to deal with patients who express concerns over vaccination for covid-19. Draconian censorship and attempts to stamp out valid concerns over the safety and efficacy of these vaccines, particularly given the glaring absence of data, does nothing but entrench people’s mistrust and misgivings. Establishing “Vaccine confidence” (now used instead of ‘vaccine hesitancy’) is going to take honest, open and transparent discourse as a starting point, not the authoritarian diktats of a totalitarian nanny state."
These messages are being couched in terms of "this is necessary action - we are doing it in order to protect people from a dreadful infection". The justification for censoring health information is that it is necessary; our benevolent, well-meaning government knows what is best for us. They are taking paternalistic care of us. They have our best interests at heart.
This, of course, has been the political message of tyranny from time immemorial.
The real purpose of this tyranny is not political control; the censorship of health information is necessary in order to deflect our attention from the failure of the conventional medical system, so dominant, but which cannot treat illness, is actually creating illness, and requires from governments ever more resources to do so.
Too few people realise this, at the moment; we are not being told! Yet, as the Children's Health Defense website (everyone should be signing up for their regular bulletins) states,
".... such tactics are likely to fan the flames of people’s concerns rather than allay or reduce them. Until governments and health authorities understand that people have valid questions about a medical intervention that involves shooting something into their bloodstream, vaccine hesitancy is only going to increase."
CHD goes on to argue that democratic governments must engage in open and transparent discourse around vaccine questions, publish full research data, be open and honest about adverse events, and citizens seeking to protect both their health. This is the reason for hesitancy: and more censorship will exacerbate the problem.
- There is no disinformation involved: the information is contained, but hidden, within the literature of the conventional medical establishment.
- There is no conspiracy theory. We are defending our right to make informed decisions about healthcare, we are demanding patient choice. We place health freedom at the very centre of all our freedoms.
If pharmaceutical medicine is so very good, so very safe, so very effective, so very necessary, let the drug industry prove this to us through positive patient outcomes
- an ability to deal with viral and other infections,
- in the reduction of the chronic disease epidemics that now rage around the world.
