'How can we know if pharmaceutical drugs being prescribed today are harming us?'

For all my regular readers on this platform I need to inform you that once again "Blogger" has seen fit to delete my post,"How can we know if the pharmaceutical drugs being prescribed today are harming us?' 

The Blogger platform is part of Google, which is a censorship organisation that does not allow us to write anything too critical about the Pharmaceutical Medical Establishment.

However, the article on Blogger was first published on my 'Safe Medicine' Substack platform, and can be read there, in full, by clicking on this link. If you want to follow my writing can I suggest that you 'follow' me on Sustack instead of Blogger.

Blogger says that the article "was flagged for review" and they "determined that it violates our guidelines". Why was it deleted? They said:

        "Your content has been evaluated according to our Misleading content policy."

I do not write 'misleading' material. My only interest in writing these articles is to assist people to think more clearly about what is "safe", and what is not "safe" medicine. The content of the deleted article can be simply outlined. 

• All pharmaceutical drugs are tested before they are given to patients, and usually described as "safe and effective". However, as drugs are consumed by patients more evidence of patient harm is discovered, and has to be added to the information listed about the drug. I know of no pharmaceutical drug that has not followed this pattern. As a result many drugs have been withdrawn or banned because of this because they were deemed "unsafe". Therefore we can assume that all currently prescribed drugs will follow the same pattern, that is, we are prescribed drugs that are not as "safe and effective" as we have been led to believe.

There is nothing 'misleading' about making this argument, although the pharmaceutical medical establishment might prefer us not to understand this. If so there is a counter-argument to be made - but clearly conventional medicine prefer not to enter into such a debate. 

Perhaps they are not too confident about winning it!

The Reason for Blogger Becoming a Censorship Organisation

As most of you will know by now, I no longer write my articles for Blogger, which now seems opposed to freedom of speech, at least when it comes to patient choice and health freedom.

I do transfer my Blogs from Substack to Blogger - unless what I have written is too critical about pharmaceutical medicine for Blogger (a Google company) to accept.

But Blogger is no longer my primary platform.

The reason for the censorship of my articles is now becoming clearer, and it was the pressure of government (no doubt allied to pharmaceutical lobbying) that I was offending. Please read about the unfolding revelations about internet platforms caving into government pressure in this Racket News website.

Then do join me on my new Substack platform, you would be most welcome. Thanks, see you there!

Another Post Censored!

This is the email that I have just received from Blogger (owned by Google). 

    "As you may know, our Community Guidelines (https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy) describe the boundaries for what we allow – and don't allow – on Blogger.  Your post titled 'The Covid-19 Pandemic and Vaccines. It's history is being written right now!' was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and deleted the post, previously at https://safe-medicine.blogspot.com/2025/08/the-covid-19-pandemic-and-vaccines-its.html. 

    Why was your blog post deleted? 

    Your content has been evaluated according to our Misleading content policy. Please visit our community guidelines page linked in this email to learn more". 

The post states, quite simply, that the history of the Covid-19 Pandemic and the Associated Vaccines, is being written right now. I would have thought this was fairly uncontroversial, and it is difficult to see why it does not meet Bloggers community guidelines. Perhaps it was because I dared to say that vaccines are neither "safe or effective"!

I have appealed their decision to censor my article, and I await their decision. In the meantime, if you wish to read the article you can see it on my new Substack platform, where, to date, it remains uncensored. Click here to read it - and I hope that the contents do not upset you too much.

Postscript. 26 August 2025): I have received another email from Blogger saying that this same post has been censored and removed. I am not sure why they wanted to repeat the message. For those who wish to retain an internet that favour free speech, particularly when it comes to criticising Big Pharma, the 'offending' article can be found at the link above.

For my followers on Blogger, can I ask you to follow me on the Substack platform, which thus far has not censored any of my articles.

 

Blogger: A Censorship Organisation?

I regret to say that the website that hosts this blog, "Blogger" is, or has become, a censorship organisation. I say this regretfully as I have been posting on this blog since 2018. But it seems increasingly likely that this blog will be soon be banned entirely - this has already been threatened by "Blogger".

(So if you follow me, or would like to do so, can you now do so on this link:  https://safemedicine.substack.com

The recent facts about Blogger's censorship activity against this blog are as follows:

On 31 May 2024 my blog "The Contaminated Blood Scandal and Covid-19 vaccines. The only difference is 50 years!" was deleted.

On 15th January my blog "Covid-19 Vaccines: have two vaccines already been banned? And are we allowed to know" was deleted.

On 5th May 2025 three of my blogs, (i) "The Largesse of the Pharmaceutical Industry: Why did doctors recommend that we take Covid-19 vaccines", (ii) "Measles Vaccine Campaign targets 'Unprotected Millions'", and (iii) "Don't get injured with prescribed drugs: you will be alone with little support" were all deleted.

I asked for all these decisions to be reconsidered. One of the deleted posts ("Don't get injured.....") was indeed reconsidered and reinstated on 9th May 2025.

However, quite amazingly, on 13th May 2025 "Don't get injured....." was again deleted! 

Deleted! Reviewed! Deleted again!?!

What sort of 'review' or 'reconsideration' was this? And on what basis have these blogs been deemed to have "violated' Blogger's "misleading content" policy in the first place? 

I am more sad than angry about this as I suspect the problem did not involve humans, but some AI computer programme! Perhaps a programme allied to, and written by people with a vested interest in pharmaceutical medicine.

My regular readers will be aware that I do not 'mislead'. If I make a statement, however challenging, it is based on evidence, my blogs always refer to that evidence, and always seeks to provide the reader with reference to that evidence.

So I will continue to use "Blogger" to post my blogs on medicine, until such time as the entire site is taken down. We all have to realise that censorship is happening regularly around the entire world. Big Corporations (not least Big Pharma) use their supporters to 'report' critical articles, and might damage their vested interests. And the media, clearly including Blogger, are pressurised into taking action. 

Rich and powerful vested interests have always controlled the media agenda in this way. So it is difficult to write about the patients harmed by the contaminated blood scandal, and similarities now with patients harmed by Covid-19 vaccines. It is difficult to point out that two Covid-19 vaccines have been withdrawn, effectively banned, because of patient harm. It is difficult to point out that there is evidence that doctors are paid to prescribe pharmaceutical drugs. It is difficult to point out that measles is now a mild disease, and to question whether vaccines are necessary. It is difficult to point out that patients who have been harmed by drugs/vaccines have an almost impossible tiask to convince the medical establishment that this is so, and to get compensation.

Perhaps all this information is "misleading", as Blogger has told me. If so the most appropriate response, within a democracy, is to counter the information with arguments and facts. In this way we are all assisted in making an informed choice - which is an important element in health freedom. It is certainly not democratic to remove/censor the information.

So this blog is prior notification to my regular readers that there is a problem - I suspect that unless I stop being critical of the pharmaceutical medical establishment this entire blog will soon be taken down.

There are clearly things we are not supposed to know about; and the medical establishment has enough influence and power to stop us hearing about them!