I am following the health debate in the USA with some interest. It is an important one, and I am impressed with what Robert F. Kennedy, Jnr., is seeking to do. It has filled me with hope and optimism that something is happening to tidy up the dishonesty, corruption and fraud that has been such an integral part of pharma-dominated health care over the last 70+ years. (I have written about the dishonesty and failure of pharmaceutical medicine in some detail here.)
However, the insistence on open, honest, transparent medical science; a significant tightening of drug regulation focused on protecting patients; and an over-heated health debate, are being ignored in Britain. I I have come to realise in recent weeks how little of this health debate is known about (leave alone happening) in Britain.
What is happening in the USA, such an important health debate, is just not being reported here in the UK!
The UK government is more interested in getting pharmaceutical investment to be concerned about any harm the industry’s vaccines and drugs are causing to patients.
The NHS, so dominant in health care in the UK, is totally controlled by, and committed to drug-based medicine (the only contact I have with my doctor’s surgery are letters offering me vaccines and drugs, even though I am entirely well).
And our mainstream media, regardless of how left and right it is, are not interested in reporting, just in case they lose a vital part of their advertising revenue from Big Pharma.
So the on-going, ever deepening epidemic of chronic disease continues. We are getting sicker, and no-one in Britain appears to want to look at the fundamental reason for this. Drugs and vaccines of limited/minimal health value, but the cause of considerable patient harm, continue to be routinely prescribed in never-decreasing amounts, without serious question. And the total cost of the NHS continues to rise without any apparent caution or analysis. The total NHS budget in financial year 2024-5 is £200 billion; and in 2025-6 it is set to rise to £230 billion. A15% rise. And spending on ‘health’ (at least the ‘health’ that comes from pills and vials) continues to be considered a ‘good’ thing by all political parties, both left and right, regardless of the negative outcomes.
Surely an honest medical science, which genuinely seeks to ascertain drug/vaccine safety is an unarguably good thing?
Surely a drug regulation system that puts patient safety first must be a priority in any health service?
The people of the USA, in the years to come, will hopefully benefit from Kennedy’s new policies, regardless of how much the pharmaceutical industry is willing to pay its apologists to oppose them.
Unfortunately, British people (through no fault of their own) are not yet aware of the new health policies arising in the USA that will lead to greater protection for patients from adverse drug harm.
