Wednesday, 28 September 2011

Parents call for ban on family of antibiotics

I bet most of you thought that antibiotics were entirely safe! Well they are not (several antibiotics have been withdrawn or banned in the past because they have been found to be dangerous. This blog is taken from the aptly named magazine, "What Doctors Don't Tell You". This is a valuable source of information on what we, as patients, are never told by the ConMed Establishment, and I certainly recommend that you take out a subscription for this magazine.

"Patients are pressing for a complete ban on a family of antibiotics that can kill or cause blindness and heart disaese. Yet, despite these alarming - and well-known - reactions doctors continue to prescribe them every day.


Fluoroquinolones or quinolones - which include antibiotics such as Cipro, Legaquin, Avelox, Tequin, Trovan and Raxar - arre the most toxic and dangerous drugs on the market today, says David Fuller, who runs a website to support others who, like himself, have been harmed by these drugs. He was been left with partial vision and permanent damage to his joints after taking one of the antibiotics for pneumonia in 1986.


Fuller says that no one is recoding the numbers of deaths and serious adverse reactions caused by the drugs, and he believes the problem is far worse than regulators are admittin. So far, five fluoroquinolones have been taken off the market after they were found to cause fatal heart problems.
www.fqresearch.org

Please go to the website for more horrifying details on what Big Pharma, and ConMed is doing to us - and not telling us!

For more information about the dangers of ConMed drugs and vaccines, and the Failure of ConMed, click here.

Monday, 26 September 2011

Homeopathy Politics and Liberty

The more homeopathy denialists attack homeopathy, the more we should all ask the question - what is their venom all about. I wrote this initially in September 2011, and with the recent attack on Homeopathy by the Chief Medical Officer (February 2013), it remains relevant.

The latest attack comes from part of the Conventional Medical (ConMed) Establishment - the BMJ. Dr Brian Kaplan has written an apt response to this gratuitous attack - and I am blogging it here as it speaks so well about what is happening.

I agree with Brian completely - this is an attack on our liberty. And it is an attack supported and funded by the sectional, and vested interests of the Big Pharmaceutical companies.

"The denialists, detractors and critics of homeopathy were back in action this week.  In a critical letter to the BMJ protesting against the Government seeking advice (sic) from experts on the registration of homeopathic products. Referring to homeopathy as ‘naked quackery’ and ‘pseudoscience’, the letter was written by Susan Bewley (an obstetrician) ‘on behalf’ of a list of names including the usual suspects, Ernst, Baum, Rose etc.) It seems the letter section of the BMJ has become a popular forum for these doctors to spout their vituperative, amateur homilies on medical politics.

So let us look at the history of the politics of homeopathy in the UK. It is important to acknowledge that throughout its history homeopathy has been attacked for the same reasons: Dilutions, implausibility, quackery and now ‘pseudoscience’, ‘bad science’ etc.

19th Century: Dr F. Quin studies homeopathy in Germany, brings it to the UK, treats the Prince of Wales and builds the London Homeopathic Hospital.  Several other homeopathic hospitals are built in England and Scotland.

1948: The NHS is formed and all the homeopathic hospitals are INVITED to become part of it. This is the reason why homeopathy (unlike aother forms of CAM) is so strongly integrated into the NHS. Homeopathic doctors and their benefactors had built hospitals staffed by doctors specialising in homeopathic treatment prior to the formation of the NHS.

1948-1990: Homeopathy becomes more and more popular both on the NHS and in private medicine. However the opposition movement becomes more determined to end NHS homeopathy. They attack on two main fronts: PR & Media and direct political attack. On the media front, The Guardian newspaper and the supposedly neutral BBC prove to be particularly useful allies to their cause but in the realm of official politics they suffer serious defeats.

December 2009 Political Defeat I: The denialists manage to get a Science and Technology Subcommittee to do an ‘Evidence Check’ on homeopathy. The controversial hearings (signed by very few of the MPs who were meant to take part in it), is addressed by Mike O’Brien the then Minister of Health in the Labour government. He famously describes the draconian anti-homeopathic suggestions of the Committee as ‘illiberal’ and makes it clear that GPs and local health authorities are best placed to decide if their patients should get NHS homeopathy or not.

July 2010: Political Defeat II: The report (with its authoritarian anti-homeopathic and anti-democratic  recommendations) passes to the new Coalition Government for consideration. The new Health Minister, Anne Milton thanks the S&T Committee for their work but then kicks all their reccomendations into touch. Her reasons for doing so are much the same as the Labour minister’s: GPs and localhealth authorities should be trusted to make the best decisions for their patients. An infuriated Michael Baum pores scorn on her in a well-publicised letter to the Lancet concluding with a condescending “Shame on you Minister!”  I was personally astonished by the aggressive, rant-like nature of this letter as Baum had only a few months before called for the debate on homeopathy to return to the ‘realm of polite disputation’.

So summing up:
Government under Labour: supported homeopathy on the NHS.

Government under Coalition: reiterated this support almost to the letter.

Head of State and family: are known to use and have used homeopathy for several generations.

The detractors, denialists and illiberal, wannabe Statist authoritarians  have tried to thwart GPs (rather than dissuade them which would at least be respectable) from referring patients for NHS homeopathy by insisting that their scientism trump due democratic process – but it hasn’t worked. Despite what Ben Goldacre writes in the Guardian, despite the letters to BMJ and Lancet, and despite inexplicable and inexcusable BBC bias against homeopathy, both Labour and Coalition Governments have seen fit to protect the significant minority support for homeopathy in the UK as well as the rights of British GPs to send their own patients for NHS homeopathy if they so wish. In doing so Government has so far managed to resist a serious, concerted attempt to undermine the democratic provision of health care in this country.

The attack on homeopathy has been a veritable Pandora’s Box of vitriol and bias that has certainly damaged British homeopathy by it’s sheer persistence and seemingly well-funded mass pressure at a PR level. It is heartening to know that at least at a pure political level, there has been unequivocal support by both Labour and the Coalition not only for homeopathy, but for something equally as important –  liberal democracy itself. Fortunately the last thing to come out of this particular Pandora’s Box was still Hope.

Friday, 23 September 2011

Common Pain Killers lead to Heart problems

It is interesting to compare what ConMed authorities tell us about drugs, and what they refuse to tell us. The Health Sciences Institute has done just this in a recent newsletter (to receive their newsletter, well worthwhile, go to their website at http://www.thehealthierlife.co.uk/.

"Higher daily dose of aspirin could play key role in preventing heart attacks for those with diabetes."

That is the kind of 'good' news we so often hear from the NHS, which is so readily peddled in the mainstream media.
Higher daily dose of aspirin could play key role in preventing heart attacks for those with diabetes" University of Alberta press release, 7/5/11, eurekalert.org 


What you won't hear is any 'news' to the contrary. For instance, this research will almost certainly not be taken up by GPs, the NHS, or the mainstream media.


"Common Painkillers May Increase Risk of Irregular Heart Rhythm" MyHealthNewsDaily, 7/5/11, myhealthnewsdaily.com 

The drugs implicated in this research is not just aspirin, but that whole group of commonly available painkillers called NSAIDs, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

"... Danish researchers compared medical records for about 32,000 atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with medical records for more than 320,000 healthy subjects. Results showed that 60 days or more of NSAID use increased AF risk by 40 per cent, and the same amount of COX-2 inhibitor use increased risk by 70 per cent.

AF is associated with the long-term risk of stroke and heart failure - and therefore death. But there are more well-known risk with taking NSAIDs - stomach bleeding - which the American Gastroenterological Association says results in more than 100,000 admissions to hospital each year (and I believe that figure in just the USA).

Nonsteriodal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)" American Gastroenterological Association, 4/24/10, gastro.org 

There are no safe ConMed drugs. The best thing anyone can do is to avoid them - and look for a safer medical therapy.

Indigestion? Don't take drugs!

Beware, anyone taking acid reflux and heartburn drugs, and thinking they are safe. They may be popular. You may not have been told they can be dangerous. But even the FDA (the US Food and Drugs Administration - the body supposed to protect us from dangerous medical drugs) now admits that they are more dangerous than we have been told.

"Detailed View: Safety Labelling Changes Approved By FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) – May 2011" FDA, fda.gov

The drugs are otherwise known as 'proton pump inhibitors' - yes, another 'inhibitor' that seeks to change the way our body functions, and therefore, causes such harm. They may cause some relief; but at what cost? The Health Sciences Institute gives two reasons why they are dangerous.

1. Contrary to what you have been led to believe, stomach acids are not there just to make your life miserable - they are responsible for digesting food.
2. Stomach acids perform other important tasks, such as protecting your stomach from C-Diff (Clostridium Difficile), a bacterium that can trigger severe digestive inflammation and diarrhoea.

The HSI newsletter goes on to explain that the drugs can cause hypo-magnesia; and state that the FDA is refusing to recognise it. Magnesium deficiency can, of course, ultimately lead to Osteoporosis, and other bone disease.

So, as they say, stomach acid is our friend, not our enemy. And yet Big Pharma wages a drug war against it. The 'war' against on part of our bodily functions causes damage to another part. But then, of course, there are more profitable drugs to wage war on this - causing problems elsewhere.

Big Pharma drugs cause disease, not 'side-effects', or 'adverse reaction' - but disease. So for temporary relief from indigestion, we may end up getting osteoporosis.

ConMed is never a good deal!

Tuesday, 20 September 2011

Homeopathy and Chickens

A farmer with over 8,000 free range organic chickens had a serious worm problem. It was untreatable with conventional drugs, and as he was an organic farmer, he had to be careful what he used to treat the hens.

So the farmer went to Crossgates, who, amongst other things, provide remedies for farm animals.
http://www.crossgatesfarm.co.uk/. They supplied the farmer with a remedy, based on taking some feathers from infested chickens (homeopathy = treating like with like), which he then applied to his flock.

The worm vanished, and has not returned in the many months that has elapsed since the treatment.

So it is little wonder that an increasing number of farmers are moving away from conventional veterinary treatment with Big Pharma drugs, with all the dangers, and lack of effectiveness - and above all, the exorbitant costs for farmers.

The conventional treatment of farm animals, of course, a story of many repeating disasters. ConMed drugs are not much good, so when there is an epidemic of a disease, like 'Foot and Mouth', as there was several years ago, the result it that 'treatment' consists of killing animals - both those with the disease, and those who are healthy but might have come into contact with a sick animal.

What sort of medicine is this - that can fail so abysmally - then resort to slaughter - and still call it medicine?


It is the medicine of failure! It is the medicine of profit for Big Pharma. It is a medicine that does farmers no favours, other than large vet bills. The organisation Homoeopathy at Wellie Level is presenting evidence to farmers of the wonderful work that homeopathy is doing for many farmers. They have produced a marvellous newspaper 'This is Homeopathy' which features several farmers who bear testimony to what homeopathy has done for their business. The testimonies are really remarkable - and before reading the newspaper I had no idea that such amazing results could be achieved, in so many areas of farming. The newspaper is in 'pdf' form at the moment. I am trying to get hold of it so that I can post it here.

Please be patient!

Monday, 12 September 2011

Dementia - what has caused the epidemic?

Dementia is now running at epidemic levels, and it is increasing. It is not only affecting an increasing number of people, but those it is affecting are getting younger. People in their 30s and 40s are now known to have dementia - even though it is commonly thought to be a disease of older age. So what is causing it? The magazine, 'What Doctors Don't Tell You' (September 2011), gives a clue.

Big Pharma drugs!

And there is a long, long list of Pharma drugs that are now known to cause this dreadful disease - the list below includes only those drugs known to give a 'severe' risk of causing dementia. And the list does not include all the trade names. And it probably only includes those that are currently known to cause the disease.

I wonder why it is that doctors, drug companies, the NHS, the government, and the mainstream media are not willing to tell us?
  • Amitriptyline
  • Amoxapine
  • Atropine
  • Benztropine
  • Chlorpheniramine
  • Chlorpromazine
  • Clemastine
  • Clozapine
  • Darifenacin
  • Desipramine
  • Dicyclomine
  • Diphenhydramine
  • Doxepin
  • Flovoxate
  • Hydroxyzine
  • Hyoscyamine
  • Imipramine
  • Meclinzine
  • Nortriptyline
  • Orphenadrine
  • Oxybutynin
  • Peroxetine
  • Perhenazine
  • Procyclidine
  • Promazine
  • Promethazine
  • Propantheline
  • Pyrilamine
  • Scopolamine
  • Thioridazine (withdrawn)
  • Tolterodine
  • Trifluoperzaine
  • Trihexyphenidyl
  • Trimipramine

Friday, 9 September 2011

Big Pharma targeting teenagers with their dangerous Gardisil vaccine

The Health Sciences Institute is new to me, but I now receive their regular newsletter. For those of you who would like to subscribe, write to them at dailyhealth@agorapub.co.uk


This is one of their newsletters, copied here in full....


"This is a warning for all parents and grandparents: Drug giant Merck wants to inject every one of your young girls and boys with Gardasil (Cervarix in the UK), the controversial human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. 

It's controversial, of course, because it's been shown to prevent a few types of human HPV, but it certainly is not a "cervical cancer vaccine," as it's sometimes touted.

In addition, the total reported adverse side effects (including deaths) linked to the vaccine are staggering.

But all those drawbacks don't bother the mainstream media. Not a bit! It's like major media outlets are playing whack- a-mole — always on a worldwide lookout for the slightest shred of good news about these HPV vaccines to pop up, and then...WHACK! they hit us over the head with it.

Spanning the globe 

Starting down under...

In a new Australian study, researchers found that Gardasil use helped reduce the number of cervix abnormalities in young girls by "as much as 50 per cent."

That sounds pretty impressive. But buried in a lower paragraph is the laughably unimpressive truth: Among vaccinated girls, the rate of high-grade cervical abnormalities was 0.42 per cent. Among unvaccinated girls: 0.8 per cent.

The difference was just a few tenths of a single percentage point! And yet when you twist the maths, it comes out like a great headline and a big win for these vaccines.

In another recent study, Austrian researchers tested more than 100 men for HPV infection and found that about 10 per cent had high-risk HPV, but none showed clinical symptoms of infection.

CNN, a global news channel based in the US — one of the media's most generous Gardasil enablers — reported on the research, and offered this quote from the vice chair of the urology department at the University of Kansas: "Not only girls, but boys should be vaccinated because of these findings."

Wow — that's a huge jump to THAT conclusion! The study didn't involve vaccinations in any form. And yet based on the results of his very small study, he's ready to vaccinate every boy.

Of course, CNN's report doesn't let out a peep about the avalanche of daunting side effects linked to these vaccines that were reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. The same was true earlier this year when CNN covered a Gardasil study that appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine.

In that study — partly designed and funded by Merck — results showed that Gardasil was about 60 per cent effective in preventing HPV genital warts in young men.

Now, you expect trials like this to have the drug company's fingerprints all over it. But CNN didn't mention anything about the study authors and their significant Merck affiliations:
    * Seven authors were employees of Merck and owned Merck stock or stock options * Five authors received Merck grant support * Five authors received speaking fees or fees for board membership from Merck * Six authors received travel reimbursement from Merck * One author had "an approved, filed, or pending patent" related to subject matter discussed in the NEJM article
Well it's just one big happy Merck family, cranking out a study with (surprise!) wonderful results for the Merck product.

"HPV vaccine effective in men" was the no-grey-areas CNN headline.

Now for the reality check

About 2,000 boys and young men received a Gardasil vaccine, and about 2,000 did not. Three years later, 36 in the Gardasil group had external genital lesions, and 89 had the same in the placebo group.

That's a difference of only 53 cases, which is pretty insubstantial given the total number of subjects and the fact that we have no way of comparing the levels of sexual activity of the two groups.

Meanwhile, at some point, 36 men must have said something like, "Wait, I got the vaccine and STILL got genital warts? What's up with that?"

Good question, Merck. What's up with that?

Mothers and fathers, grandfathers and grandmothers – don't be fooled by the media's ridiculous whack-a-mole game. This vaccine is in no way worth the risk for your young boys and girls.

Big Pharma companies - top list for government fraud

The Health Sciences Institute (HSI) have recently announced that Big Pharma companies are up to a variety of "underhand fraudulent activities". Their newsletter said that in a recent 'Public Citizen' report, in the US, it was revealed that drug companies have drawn False Claims Act penalties of nearly $20 billion - the vast majority occurring in the last five years. 

They said that the biggest culprit was Pfizer, who had to pay up a settlement of more than $2 billion for one infraction, the illegal marketing of Bextra, their now-defunct painkiller.

However, three other companies joined Pfizer in what HSI described as 'the elite upper echelon of the Big Pharma Fraud Club', which paid out a combined $10.5 billion in in fines over just 20 years.

* Eli Lilly
* GlaxoSmithKline
* Schering-Plough. 

Apparently, one common swindle involved Big Pharma overcharging cash-strapped state funded pharmaceutical suppliers as much as 12 TIMES the cost of a drug. 

Yet given the wealth of Big Pharma companies, these financial penalties are relatively small. The risk of getting caught is soon repaid by the huge level of drug company profits. So big are these profits, raising the fines substantially will probably not act as a deterrent against fraud of this kind.

HSI suggest that Big Pharma fraud, in all its manifestations, should be dealt with through criminal law because, as it says, these practices put everyone at risk - but 'does a great job of boosting drug company profits.

But in the name of profit, Big Pharma CEOs, and senior executives, have been putting us all at risk long enough. And as HSI say, what they are doing is criminal - and they get off by writing relatively small cheques from the company's account.

So if any reader is still taking ConMed drugs, please consider. Are you taking them for your health? Or in order to boost the profits of wealthy drug companies?

A case of Angina - treated with homeopathy

Sanket Taldevkar sent me this case, someone he has treated for Angina. I am pleased to publish this, on his behalf, in order to show the nature of the homeopathy interview - the precursor to enabling patients to access safe and effective homeopathic treatment. It is published just as he sent it to me, and demonstrates just how effective homeopathy can be in the treatment of Angina.


Not every homeopathy works in the same way, but notice how the emotional symptoms of the patient have been considered in equal measure to the physical symptoms of Angina. This shows how homeopathy qualifies as a truly holistic therapy. 

The mind, and our emotions, are central to our physical health.


CASE OF ANGINA
MALE. 40 YR/M

STRESS TEST POSITIVE, SER.CHOLESTROLE BORDERLINE. AND HYPERTENSION

D: WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM?
P: PAIN IN CHEST SINCE LAST TWO MONTHS.

D: TELL ME MORE ABOUT CHEST PAIN, HOW IT STARTS?
P: SINCE LAST TWO THREE MONTH I HAVE NOTICE MYSELF WHENEVER I WALK FAST OR DO MY PRACTICE PAIN STARTS [PT IS CLASSICAL DANCER AND TEACHER BY PROFESSION]

D: TELL ME MORE ABOUT THIS? WHAT HAPPENS TO YOU EXACTLY? WHEN U WALK FAST OR DO UR PRACTICE?
P: MEANS WHEN I START MY MORNING CLASS I FIND PAIN IN CHEST WITHIN 10 MINS.

D: TELL ME ABOUT THAT TEN MINS WHAT HAPPENED EXACTLLY?
P: FOR FIRST 10 MIN I FEEL PAIN IN MY CHEST, THEN I HAVE TO TAKE REST FOR HALF AN HOUR THEN ONLY I CAN PRACTICE FURTHER, BUT AGAIN WITH SOME EFFORT PAIN RETURNS, AND SAME THINGS GOES ON.

D: TELL ME MORE ABOUT THAT PAIN?
P: IT IS IN CENTER OF THE CHEST.

D: CAN U DESCRIBE THE TYPE OF PAIN
P: IT’S KIND OF PRESSING.

D: TELL ME MORE ABOUT PRESSING
P: MEANS I CAN FEEL PRESSURE IN CHEST, THAT TIME I COULDN’T SPEEK PROPERLLY

D: WHAT HAPPENS TO U AT THAT MOMENT?
P: IT IS VERY DISTURBING TO ME

D: DISTURBING MEANS
P: MEANS I COULDN’T FOCUS ON MY PRACTICE

D: TELL MORE ABOUT THIS, WHEN IT IS DISTURBING THE MOST?
P: ITS DISTURBING BECAUSE I CANT COPE UP WITH RHYTHEM, MANY OF THE TIME I BARE THAT PAIN TILL THE POINT IT GOT WORSE AND TRY TO MAINTAIN MY STAMINA. PREVIOUSLLY WHEN THERE WAS NO SUCH PAIN I USED TO PRACTICE 2 TO 3 HRS A DAY NON STOP BUT NOW I HAVE TO TAKE REST IN BETWEEN.

D: WHEN U DECIDE TO STOP DANCING AND HAVE REST?
P: SEE I CAN DANCE TILL HALF AN HR BUT AFTER THAT I CAN FEEL I AM NOT CO-OPING WITH THE RYHTM THEN, THAT TIME I FEEL PAIN IN MY CHEST?

D: TELL ME MORE ABOUT, WHEN U NOTICE THAT U R NOT CO-OPING WITH RHYTHM
P: THAT MOMENT I AM PUSHING MYSELF TRYING HARD BUT I CAN’T, DUE TO PAIN

D: HOW IT FEELS TO U AT THAT MOMENT WHEN U R PUSHING URSELF AND TRYING HARD BUT CANT
P: I FEEL VERY ANGRY ABOUT MYSELF

D: WHAT THE ANGER ABOUT?
P: WHY I CAN’T CO-UP WITH THIS

D: THIS IS WHAT U THINK RIGHT
P: YA

D: BUT WHAT IS THE ANGER ABOUT?
P: ANGER ABOUT MY POTENTIAL.

D: TELL ABOUT POTENTIAL.
P: POTENTIAL, CAPACITY TO SUSTAIN YOUR ENERGY [Hg: CLOSING ALL HIS FINGERS AND MAKING IT LIKE PUNCH]

D: CAN U EXPLAIN ME THIS
P: ITS LIKE THINGS ARE IN YOUR CONTROL, AND YOU ARE IN HARMONY WITH IT [Hg. SAME AS MENTION ABOUVE]

D: WHAT IS THIS YOU ARE SHOWING WITH YOU HAND?
P: IT’S CONTROL

D: EXPLAIN ME THE WORD CONTROL
P: CONTROLE IN THE SENSE, IT GIVES ME SATISFACTION.

D: WHAT IS CONTROL FOR YOU?
P: FOR ME IT’S VERY IMPORTANT.

D: HOW
P: FOR ME, TO GIVE MY BEST PERFORMANCE I HAVE TO BE IN VERY DISCIPLINED MANNER. BECAUSE IN DANCE ITS NOT ONLY THE MUSIC, NOT ONLY THE DANCER BUT DICIPLINE OR YOU CAN SAY HARMONY IS MOST IMPORTANT.

D: TELL MORE ABOUT HARMONEY, DISCIPLINE, PERFORMANCE
P: I CAN SAY HARMONY AND DISPLINE ARE THE MOST MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF ANY PERFORMER, AND NOW A DAYS I AM SRUGLLING WITH THIS.

D: HOW IT FEELS TO YOU?
P: IT FEELS LIKE GOING DOWN.

D: TELL ME ABOUT YOUR FEARS
P: GENERALLY I DON’T HAVE ANY FEAR BUT NOW DAYS I FEEL LIKE I AM NOT ABEL TO DANCE LIKE BEFORE I DID.

D: WHAT IS THE FEAR ABOUT?
P: FEAR ABOUT LOOSING PERFORMANCE DUE TO PAIN. MEANS WHEN YOU ARE IN FRONT OF AUDIENCE YOU HAVE TO GIVE YOUR 200% THEN ONLY YOU GET APPRECEATION AS A PERFORMER. AND TILL THIS DATE I AM DOING MY BEST I AM PREPARING MYSELF FOR NATIONAL EVENT.

D: SO WHAT IS MOST THING YOU ARE CONCERN ABOUT
P: WILL I ABEL TO MAINTAIN THIS, BECAUSE AT NATIONAL LEVEL COMPETITION IS VERY TUFF ONE MISTAKE AND YOU ARE OUT OF THE LIST, EVRYONE GIVES HIS BEST. AND I DON’T WANT TO MISS THIS DUE TO THIS REASONE

D: TELL ME MORE ABOUT THIS
P: FOR A BIGNEAR IT’S NOTHING TO LOOSE, BUT FOR PERSON LIKE ME IT’S COMING DOWN FROM YOUR LEVEL.

D: TELL ME MORE ABOUT COMING DOWN.
P: BASICALLY IT’S A FEAR OF FAILURE AND DUE TO SMALL MISTAKE

D: TELL ME ABOUT YOUR MOST STRESSFUL EVENT IN LIFE
P: I THINK 6YR BACK

D: WHAT HAPPENED THAT TIME?
P: I STARTED MY DANCE CLASSES WITH MY FRIEND , BUT AFTER A YEAR IT DIDN'T GO WELL, AND THAT TIME I WAS NEW IN THIS TOWN, SO I UNDERGONE LOST OF DIFFICULTIES , MEANS I EVEN DON’T KNOW HINDI OR MARATHI AT THAT TIME.

D: HOW IT FEELS TO YOU AT THAT MOMENT?
P: NOTHING, I TOOK IT AS A CHALLENGE AND WORK HARD AND STARTED MY OWN DANCE CLASSES. BUT NOW IT’S OK I DON’T THINK MUCH ABOUT IT.

D: TELL ME MORE ABOUT YOUR HOBBIES
P: THE ONLY THING I LIKE IS DANCE.

D: WHAT YOU LIKE THE MOST ABOUT DANCE?
P: EVRYTHING ABOUT DANCE, FOR ME IT’S INNER SATISFACTION WHEN YOU GET APPRICIATION.

D: HOW IT FEELS TO YOU WHEN YOU GET APPRICIATION?
P: THAT IS THE ONLY THING FOR WHICH ANY PERFORMER DOES EFFORTS, ITS NOT ONLY ONE EVENT YOU HAVE TO MAINTAIN THAT THEN ONLY YOU ARE GREAT PERFOMER

D: DO YOU GET ANY DREAM?
P: SINCE 4-5 MONTHS I HAD VERY HORRIBLE DREAMS

D: TELL ME IN DETAIL.
P: MEANS, I SEE AM STANDING IN A RAW FOR AUDITION, SO MANY PEOPLE ARE THERE THE ONE BOY WHO IS RECEPTIONIST CALLS EVRYONE INSIDE EXCEPT ME.

D: TELL ME MORE ABOUT IT
P: I FEEL VERY RESTLESS THAT MOMENT, SO I DIRECTLLY RUN INSIDE THE AUDITION HALL, MUSIC AND ALL STRATS BUT I FORGOT MY STEPS, AND THEN I WAKE UP .AND THEN WHOLE DAY I KEEP THINKING ABOUT IT.

D: HOW IT FEELS TO YOU?
P: IT CREATES ANXIETY IN DAY TIME, EVEN THOUGH I AM PRACTICING.

D: WHAT IS THE ANXIETY ABOUT?
P: ANXIETY ABOUT LOOSING OR MISSING STEPS, THAT IS ONE MORE PROBLEM FOR ME, WHENEVER I AM GETTING READY FOR AN EVENT I FEEL VERY RESTLESS. I KEEP DOING STEPS AGAIN AND AGAIN SO AS TO AVOID MY ANXIETY.

UNDERSTANDING OF THE CASE : PT IS SUFFERING FROM PAIN IN CHEST, ON INQUIRING ABOUT PAIN WE COME TO KNOW THE BASIC PROBLEM FOR HIM IS , HE IS NOT ABEL TO MAINTAIN HIS STAMINA FOR PERFORMANCE .THIS IS THE MOST TROUBLING FOR HIM.
KINGDOM MINERAL: BASIC ISSUE IS ABOUT STRUCTURE, BECAUSE ON ASKING ABOUT PAIN THERE IS NO ISSUE OF PLANT SENSITIVITY OR THERE IS NOTHING SPECIFIC SENSATION WHICH INDICATES PLANT KINGDOM, SAME WITH ANIMAL THERE IS NO ISSUE OF VICTIM AGGRESSOR OR COMPETITION OR BASIC SURVIVAL ISSUE.

HERE PT IS STRUGLLING WITH HIMSELF, HE PERCIEVS PROBLEM AS A DISTURBANCE IN MAINTAINING HIS PERFORMANCE, AGAIN WITH MINERAL HE HAS PROBLEM IN PERFORMANCE NOT ABOUT SECURITY, POWER, OR IDENTITY SO IT INDICATES ROW 5. IN ROW 5 HE HAS STRUGGLING TO MAINTAIN WHAT HE HAS ACHIVED TILL DATE SO IT, NEED TO MAINTAIN IT SO IT’S COLUM 11

REMEDY GIVEN ARGENTUM METALLICUM 200 / ONE DOSE

F/O: 15 DAYS. BLOOD PRESSURE: 140/100
PAIN ON EXERTION IS STILL THERE, COMPLAINS PAIN AND BURNING MICTURATION, WITH FEVER.
ADV. DRINK LOT OF WATER, AND EXERCISE WITH IN NORMAL LIMITS SO AS TO DEVELOP COLATERAL
TREATMENT: SL ONE DOSE

F/O AFTER 3 DAYS: BLOOD PRESSURE 140/100, PAIN IS STILL THERE, BUT UTI IS BETTER NOW, NO FEVER
TREATMENT: SL ONE DOSE

F/O AFTER 15 DAYS. BLOOD PRESSURE 130/100, PAIN IS THERE BUT NOW PT CAN DANCE TILL 1HR.
TREATMENT: SL ONE DOSE

F/O: AFTER 15 DAYS PT CALLS ME AND SAID THERE IS LOT OF PAIN IN CHEST SINCE MORNING.
ON ASKING ABOUT THIS HE SAYS HE GOT AN INVITATION FROM ANY GROUP TO PERFORM THERE AND FOR THAT HE DID HEAVY PRACTICE. BLOOD PRESSURE: 140/110
TREATMENT: ARGENTUM 200 ONE DOSE

F/ O: AFTER 15 DAYS PAIN IS REDUSED, BLOOD PRESSURE 130/100

F/O AFTER 30 DAYS PAIN REDUSED, BLOOD PRESSURE 130/90, SER CHOL.IN NORMAL LIMITS. THIS TIME STRESS TEST NEGATIVE
PT IS PREPARING FOR NEW EVENT BUT NOW HE IS NOT FEELING ANY ANXIETY, NO RESTLESSNESS, DOING HIS PRACTICE. THERE IS NO DREAM AT ALL SLEEPS WELL.
PT STILL ON TREATMENT

Homeopathy - the real Evidence Based Medicine

What is the best form of medicine? What sort of medicine would you prefer?

* A therapy, such as homeopathy, based on simple principles or laws, that gives patients' safe remedies, and bases its practice, and develops its practice, on observing the outcomes of those remedies with patients?

* Or a drug-based medical system, that tests its drugs for effectiveness and safety on the basis of 'Randomised Controlled Tests', or RCTs, which are then regularly withdrawn after being given to millions of patients and found to be ineffective, dangerous, or both?

When you consider how often, and how regularly Conventional Medicine (ConMed) gets it wrong about the safety and efficacy of their drugs, and gives patients drugs that either don't work, or cause further disease and even death, it is quite amazing (see, for example, this website that lists many of the banned and withdrawn ConMed drugs):
http://s-scrutton.co.uk/Banned_Pharma_Drugs/Banned,_withdrawn_drugs.html

So there is, of course, only one sensible answer. Patients, first and foremost, want to be safe. They don't want to take drugs that not only fail not make them better, but actually cause further disease. They just want to be better!

One of the latest admissions of error concerns Hypertension, and 'high-blood-pressure'. It has emerged that 25% of people diagnosed with this condition don't actually have it!

But patients with hypertension are still given ConMed drugs - usually Statins. Most people know only what they have been told about Statin drugs - they are very effective - and entirely safe. But of course, they aren't! They are now associated with the following disease-inducing-effects (DIEs) - even though some conventional doctors are still telling us they are 'entirely safe'.

* Diabetes
* Serious skin infections
* Prostate Cancer
* Serious structural muscle damage (that can cause death)
* Certain cognitive problems.

Statin drugs, and ConMed generally, is a bad deal for patients. It tells us that HPB is bad for you (even this can be seriously questioned). It devises a test for HBP and then discovers it is getting it wrong with at least 25% of patients. Then it provides people who are probably not sick drugs that can make them very sick!

And ConMed then claims that it is entirely based on 'evidence'!

Well, in fairness, I suppose it is. It is just that the evidence of RCTs are not reliable. In fact, they have proven to be so unreliable they rarely tell us about the dangers of drugs until millions have taken them, and suffered their DIEs.

In stark contrast, homeopaths can give patients remedies knowing they will do no harm - the basic principle of the Hippocratic Oath that all doctors subscribe to. And if the remedy matches the symptoms of disease it is treating, they will treat the illness successfully.

How do we know what the patient's symptoms are? Simple! We ask them!

How do we know the symptom-picture of remedies? Simple! We test, or prove the remedies on people (knowing already that the process of potentizing remedies makes them entirely safe), and we observe the outcomes with patients. All this evidence has been put together over the last 200+ years - and is contained within the Homeopathic Materia Medica, and the Homeopathic Repertories.

The skill of the homeopath is to learn the complex and complicated techniques of 
matching the symptoms of both patient and remedy.

So where do RCTs enter this picture. Well, they don't! Homeopathy does not need RCTs to examine, or re-examine, what homeopaths have been doing for centuries. Why should we make use of a technique that has proven to be worthless when applied to ConMed drugs? ConMed, and Big Pharma drug companies have been using them for decades to confirm that drugs are safe and effective when, in fact, they have eventually been proven to be ineffective and dangerous. Statins have yet to be banned, or heavily restricted, like so many others. But it will come, as with all the others.

So drug-based ConMed is not 'evidence-based' medicine - because the so-called evidence that supports it has proven itself to be totally unreliable.

The real 'evidence-based' medicine is homeopathy. We  know our remedies. We know what they do. Patients routinely benefit from homeopathy, and do so in complete safety. But the real evidence comes from out patients - people who were ill, and get better after homeopathic treatment.