Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Covid-19 vaccines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Covid-19 vaccines. Show all posts

Monday, 13 December 2021

Covid-19 Vaccines. Allow Pfizer to tell you officially about the adverse reactions their vaccine is known to cause

Covid-19 vaccines, we have been told, are extremely effective, and very safe. This is why we have all been urged to take the vaccines, and the vast majority of people have complied.

Indeed, the vaccines are so effective and so safe our governments are prepared to mandate them, force them on people who wish to remain vaccine free, either subtly (?) through 'vaccine passports', or by direct force - loss of employment, heavy fines and imprisonment.

Drug companies have a long history of launching new pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines as "super-drugs" and "wonder cures" that will "transform our experience of illness". There is also a long history of new pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines (the same ones) being withdrawn or banned because they have proven to be neither effective, and dangerous to human health.

So how are the Covid-19 vaccines doing, in terms of effectiveness and safety?

The official pharmaceutical analysis of the pandemic, the narrative that government, conventional medical authorities, and the mainstream media has been pressing on us for the past two years is adamant. 

  • They are safe. 
  • They are effective. 
  • Everyone should accept them. 
  • And anyone wishing to remain vaccine free should be forced to take them.

So what is the information coming out of Pfizer, one of the major pharmaceutical companies that has a huge stake the promotion of Covid-19 vaccines?

First, we should look at the Patient Information Leaflet (PIL) that Pfizer has written, and has to be provided, by law, to everyone who receives the vaccine. This is what it tells us.

WHAT ARE THE RISKS OF THE VACCINE? 

There is a remote chance that the vaccine could cause a severe allergic reaction. A severe allergic reaction would usually occur within a few minutes to 1 hour after getting a dose of the vaccine. For this reason, your vaccination provider may ask you to stay at the place where you received your vaccine for monitoring after vaccination. Signs of a severe allergic reaction can include:

  • Difficulty breathing
  • Swelling of your face and throat
  • A fast heartbeat 
  • A bad rash all over your body
  • Dizziness and weakness 

Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart) have occurred in some people who have received the vaccine, more commonly in males under 40 years of age than among females and older males. In most of these people, symptoms began within a few days following receipt of the second dose of vaccine. The chance of having this occur is very low. You should seek medical attention right away if you have any of the following symptoms after receiving the vaccine:

  • Chest pain
  • Shortness of breath
  • Feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering, or pounding heart 

Side effects that have been reported with the vaccine include:

  • severe allergic reactions
  • non-severe allergic reactions such as rash, itching, hives, or swelling of the face
  • myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle)
  • pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart)
  • injection site pain
  • tiredness
  • headache
  • muscle pain
  • chills
  • joint pain
  • fever
  • injection site swelling
  • injection site redness
  • nausea
  • feeling unwell
  • swollen lymph nodes (lymphadenopathy)
  • decreased appetite
  • diarrhea
  • vomiting
  • arm pain
  • fainting in association with injection of the vaccine

These may not be all the possible side effects of the vaccine. Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. The possible side effects of the vaccine are still being studied in clinical trials.

 Indeed, to re-use Pfizer's words, these might not be all the possible adverse reactions that can be caused by the vaccine, even though they demonstrate that the official pharmaceutical narrative has been, at best, "economical with the truth". The vaccine cannot honestly be is not safe.

However, another Pfizer document, one that was supposed to be 'confidential' but released under 'Freedom and Information' requests in the USA, shows that the company are fully aware of this. It demonstrates that whilst the Patient Information Leaflet can be considered more truthful than the official pharmaceutical narrative, to which we have all been subjected for over two years, even this is certainly far from being the whole truth. I apologise, in advance, for this huge long list of adverse reactions to the vaccine, which itself is a summary of section 5.3.6 of the document - "Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorisation Adverse Event Reports" (thanks to Jonn Rappaport for this extraction).. Skim through it - you do not need to read it all, or understand the jargon. Each reported condition means that a certain number of vaccinated patients has been harmed in this particular way in the past year.

  • 2-Hydroxyglutaric aciduria; 
  • 5'nucleotidase increased; 
  • Acoustic neuritis; 
  • Acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency; 
  • Acquired epidermolysis bullosa; 
  • Acquired epileptic aphasia; 
  • Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus; 
  • Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; 
  • Acute encephalitis with refractory, repetitive partial seizures; 
  • Acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis; 
  • Acute flaccid myelitis; 
  • Acute haemorrhagic leukoencephalitis; 
  • Acute haemorrhagic oedema of infancy; 
  • Acute kidney injury; 
  • Acute macular outer retinopathy; 
  • Acute motor axonal neuropathy; 
  • Acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy; 
  • Acute myocardial infarction;  
  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • Acute respiratory failure;
  •  Addison's disease; 
  • Administration site thrombosis; 
  • Administration site vasculitis; 
  • Adrenal thrombosis; 
  • Adverse event following immunisation; 
  • Ageusia; 
  • Agranulocytosis; 
  • Air embolism; 
  • Alanine aminotransferase abnormal; 
  • Alanine aminotransferase increased; 
  • Alcoholic seizure; 
  • Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis; 
  • Allergic oedema; 
  • Alloimmune hepatitis; 
  • Alopecia areata; 
  • Alpers disease; 
  • Alveolar proteinosis; 
  • Ammonia abnormal; 
  • Ammonia increased; 
  • Amniotic cavity infection; 
  • Amygdalohippocampectomy; 
  • Amyloid arthropathy; 
  • Amyloidosis; 
  • Amyloidosis senile; 
  • Anaphylactic reaction; 
  • Anaphylactic shock; 
  • Anaphylactic transfusion reaction; 
  • Anaphylactoid reaction; 
  • Anaphylactoid shock; 
  • Anaphylactoid syndrome of pregnancy; 
  • Angioedema; 
  • Angiopathic neuropathy; 
  • Ankylosing spondylitis; 
  • Anosmia; 
  • Antiacetylcholine receptor antibody positive; 
  • Anti-actin antibody positive; 
  • Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody positive; 
  • Anti-basal ganglia antibody positive; 
  • Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive; 
  • Anti-epithelial antibody positive; 
  • Anti-erythrocyte antibody positive; 
  • Anti-exosome complex antibody positive; 
  • Anti- GAD antibody negative; Anti-GAD antibody positive; 
  • Anti-ganglioside antibody positive; 
  • Antigliadin antibody positive; 
  • Anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody positive; 
  • Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease; 
  • Anti-glycyl-tRNA synthetase antibody positive; 
  • Anti-HLA antibody test positive; 
  • Anti-IA2 antibody positive; 
  • Anti-insulin antibody increased; 
  • Anti-insulin antibody positive; 
  • Anti-insulin receptor antibody increased; 
  • Anti-insulin receptor antibody positive; 
  • Anti-interferon antibody negative; 
  • Anti-interferon antibody positive; 
  • Anti-islet cell antibody positive; 
  • Antimitochondrial antibody positive; 
  • Anti-muscle specific kinase antibody positive; 
  • Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibodies positive; 
  • Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein associated polyneuropathy; Antimyocardial antibody positive; 
  • Anti-neuronal antibody positive; 
  • Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody increased; 
  • Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive; 
  • Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive vasculitis; 
  • Anti-NMDA antibody positive; 
  • Antinuclear antibody increased; 
  • Antinuclear antibody positive; 
  • Antiphospholipid antibodies positive; 
  • Antiphospholipid syndrome; 
  • Anti-platelet antibody positive; 
  • Anti-prothrombin antibody positive; 
  • Antiribosomal P antibody positive; 
  • Anti-RNA polymerase III antibody positive; 
  • Anti-saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody test positive; 
  • Anti-sperm antibody positive; 
  • Anti-SRP antibody positive; 
  • Antisynthetase syndrome; 
  • Anti-thyroid antibody positive; 
  • Anti-transglutaminase antibody increased; 
  • Anti-VGCC antibody positive; 
  • Anti-VGKC antibody positive; 
  • Anti-vimentin antibody positive; 
  • Antiviral prophylaxis; 
  • Antiviral treatment; 
  • Anti-zinc transporter 8 antibody positive; 
  • Aortic embolus; 
  • Aortic thrombosis; 
  • Aortitis; 
  • Aplasia pure red cell; 
  • Aplastic anaemia; 
  • Application site thrombosis; 
  • Application site vasculitis; 
  • Arrhythmia; 
  • Arterial bypass occlusion; 
  • Arterial bypass thrombosis; 
  • Arterial thrombosis; 
  • Arteriovenous fistula thrombosis; 
  • Arteriovenous graft site stenosis; 
  • Arteriovenous graft thrombosis; 
  • Arteritis; 
  • Arteritis coronary; 
  • Arthralgia; 
  • Arthritis; Arthritis enteropathic; Ascites; Aseptic cavernous sinus thrombosis; Aspartate aminotransferase abnormal; Aspartate aminotransferase increased; Aspartate-glutamate-transporter deficiency; AST to platelet ratio index increased; AST/ALT ratio abnormal; Asthma; Asymptomatic COVID-19; Ataxia; Atheroembolism; Atonic seizures; Atrial thrombosis; Atrophic thyroiditis; 
  • Atypical benign partial epilepsy;  
  • Atypical pneumonia
  • Aura; 
  • Autoantibody positive; 
  • Autoimmune anaemia; 
  • Autoimmune aplastic anaemia; 
  • Autoimmune arthritis; 
  • Autoimmune blistering disease; 
  • Autoimmune cholangitis; 
  • Autoimmune colitis; 
  • Autoimmune demyelinating disease; 
  • Autoimmune dermatitis; 
  • Autoimmune disorder; 
  • Autoimmune encephalopathy; 
  • Autoimmune endocrine disorder; 
  • Autoimmune enteropathy; 
  • Autoimmune eye disorder; 
  • Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia; 
  • Autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; 
  • Autoimmune hepatitis; 
  • Autoimmune hyperlipidaemia; 
  • Autoimmune hypothyroidism; 
  • Autoimmune inner ear disease; 
  • Autoimmune lung disease; 
  • Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome; 
  • Autoimmune myocarditis; 
  • Autoimmune myositis; 
  • Autoimmune nephritis; 
  • Autoimmune neuropathy; 
  • Autoimmune neutropenia; 
  • Autoimmune pancreatitis; 
  • Autoimmune pancytopenia; 
  • Autoimmune pericarditis; 
  • Autoimmune retinopathy; 
  • Autoimmune thyroid disorder; 
  • Autoimmune thyroiditis; 
  • Autoimmune uveitis; 
  • Autoinflammation with infantile enterocolitis; 
  • Autoinflammatory disease; 
  • Automatism epileptic; 
  • Autonomic nervous system imbalance; 
  • Autonomic seizure; 
  • Axial spondyloarthritis; 
  • Axillary vein thrombosis; 
  • Axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathy; 
  • Axonal neuropathy; 
  • Bacterascites; 
  • Baltic myoclonic epilepsy; 
  • Band sensation; 
  • Basedow's disease; 
  • Basilar artery thrombosis; 
  • Basophilopenia; 
  • B-cell aplasia; 
  • Behcet's syndrome; 
  • Benign ethnic neutropenia; 
  • Benign familial neonatal convulsions; 
  • Benign familial pemphigus; 
  • Benign rolandic epilepsy; 
  • Beta-2 glycoprotein antibody positive; 
  • Bickerstaff's encephalitis; 
  • Bile output abnormal; 
  • Bile output decreased; 
  • Biliary ascites; 
  • Bilirubin conjugated abnormal; 
  • Bilirubin conjugated increased; 
  • Bilirubin urine present; 
  • Biopsy liver abnormal; 
  • Biotinidase deficiency; 
  • Birdshot chorioretinopathy; 
  • Blood alkaline phosphatase abnormal; 
  • Blood alkaline phosphatase increased; 
  • Blood bilirubin abnormal; 
  • Blood bilirubin increased; 
  • Blood bilirubin unconjugated increased; 
  • Blood cholinesterase abnormal; 
  • Blood cholinesterase decreased; 
  • Blood pressure decreased; 
  • Blood pressure diastolic decreased; 
  • Blood pressure systolic decreased; 
  • Blue toe syndrome; 
  • Brachiocephalic vein thrombosis; 
  • Brain stem embolism; 
  • Brain stem thrombosis; 
  • Bromosulphthalein test abnormal; 
  • Bronchial oedema; 
  • Bronchitis; 
  • Bronchitis mycoplasmal; 
  • Bronchitis viral; 
  • Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis allergic; 
  • Bronchospasm; 
  • Budd-Chiari syndrome; 
  • Bulbar palsy; 
  • Butterfly rash; 
  • C1q nephropathy; 
  • Caesarean section; 
  • Calcium embolism; 
  •  Capillaritis; 
  • Caplan's syndrome; 
  • Cardiac amyloidosis; 
  • Cardiac arrest; 
  • Cardiac failure; 
  • Cardiac failure acute; 
  • Cardiac sarcoidosis; 
  • Cardiac ventricular thrombosis; 
  • Cardiogenic shock; 
  • Cardiolipin antibody positive; 
  • Cardiopulmonary failure; 
  • Cardio-respiratory arrest; 
  • Cardio-respiratory distress; 
  • Cardiovascular insufficiency; 
  • Carotid arterial embolus; 
  • Carotid artery thrombosis; 
  • Cataplexy; 
  • Catheter site thrombosis; 
  • Catheter site vasculitis; 
  • Cavernous sinus thrombosis; 
  • CDKL5 deficiency disorder; 
  • CEC syndrome; 
  • Cement embolism; 
  • Central nervous system lupus; 
  • Central nervous system vasculitis; 
  • Cerebellar artery thrombosis; 
  • Cerebellar embolism; 
  • Cerebral amyloid angiopathy; 
  • Cerebral arteritis; 
  • Cerebral artery embolism; 
  • Cerebral artery thrombosis; 
  • Cerebral gas embolism; 
  • Cerebral microembolism; 
  • Cerebral septic infarct; 
  • Cerebral thrombosis; 
  • Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis; 
  • Cerebral venous thrombosis; 
  • Cerebrospinal thrombotic; 
  • [Radiculitis] brachial; 
  • Radiologically isolated syndrome; 
  • Rash; 
  • Rash erythematous; 
  • Rash pruritic; 
  • Rasmussen encephalitis; 
  • Raynaud's phenomenon; 
  • Reactive capillary endothelial proliferation; 
  • Relapsing multiple sclerosis; 
  • Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; 
  • Renal amyloidosis; 
  • Renal arteritis; 
  • Renal artery thrombosis; 
  • Renal embolism; 
  • Renal failure; 
  • Renal vascular thrombosis; 
  • Renal vasculitis; 
  • Renal vein embolism; 
  • Renal vein thrombosis; 
  • Respiratory arrest; 
  • Respiratory disorder; 
  • Respiratory distress; 
  • Respiratory failure; 
  • Respiratory paralysis; 
  • Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis; 
  • Respiratory syncytial virus bronchitis; 
  • Retinal artery embolism; 
  • Retinal artery occlusion; 
  • Retinal artery thrombosis; 
  • Retinal vascular thrombosis; 
  • Retinal vasculitis; 
  • Retinal vein occlusion; 
  • Retinal vein thrombosis; 
  • Retinol binding protein decreased; 
  • Retinopathy; 
  • Retrograde portal vein flow; 
  • Retroperitoneal fibrosis; 
  • Reversible airways obstruction; 
  • Reynold's syndrome; 
  • Rheumatic brain disease; 
  • Rheumatic disorder; 
  • Rheumatoid arthritis; 
  • Rheumatoid factor increased; 
  • Rheumatoid factor positive; 
  • Rheumatoid factor quantitative increased; Rheumatoid lung; 
  • Rheumatoid neutrophilic dermatosis; 
  • Rheumatoid nodule; 
  • Rheumatoid nodule removal; 
  • Rheumatoid scleritis; 
  • Rheumatoid vasculitis; 
  • Saccadic eye movement; 
  • SAPHO syndrome; 
  • Sarcoidosis; 
  • SARS-CoV-1 test; 
  • SARS-CoV-1 test negative; 
  • SARS-CoV-1 test positive; 
  • SARS-CoV-2 antibody test; 
  • SARS-CoV-2 antibody test negative; 
  • SARS-CoV-2 antibody test positive; 
  • SARS-CoV-2 carrier; 
  • SARS-CoV-2 sepsis; 
  • SARS-CoV-2 test; 
  • SARS- CoV-2 test false negative; 
  • SARS-CoV-2 test false positive; 
  • SARS-CoV-2 test negative; 
  • SARS- CoV-2 test positive; 
  • SARS-CoV-2 viraemia; 
  • Satoyoshi syndrome; 
  • Schizencephaly; 
  • Scleritis; 
  • Sclerodactylia; 
  • Scleroderma; 
  • Scleroderma associated digital ulcer; 
  • Scleroderma renal crisis; 
  • Scleroderma-like reaction; 
  • Secondary amyloidosis; 
  • Secondary cerebellar degeneration; 
  • Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; 
  • Segmented hyalinising vasculitis; 
  • Seizure; 
  • Seizure anoxic; 
  • Seizure cluster; 
  • Seizure like phenomena; 
  • Seizure prophylaxis; 
  • Sensation of foreign body; 
  • Septic embolus; 
  • Septic pulmonary embolism; 
  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome; 
  • Severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy; 
  • Shock; 
  • Shock symptom; 
  • Shrinking lung syndrome; 
  • Shunt thrombosis; 
  • Silent thyroiditis; 
  • Simple partial seizures; 
  • Sjogren's syndrome; 
  • Skin swelling; 
  • SLE arthritis;
  • Smooth muscle antibody positive; 
  • Sneezing; 
  • Spinal artery embolism; 
  • Spinal artery thrombosis; 
  • Splenic artery thrombosis; 
  • Splenic embolism; 
  • Splenic thrombosis; 
  • Splenic vein thrombosis; 
  • Spondylitis; 
  • Spondyloarthropathy; 
  • Spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome; 
  • Status epilepticus; 
  •  Stevens-Johnson syndrome
  • Stiff leg syndrome; 
  • Stiff person syndrome; 
  • Stillbirth; 
  • Still's disease; 
  • Stoma site thrombosis; 
  • Stoma site vasculitis; 
  • Stress cardiomyopathy; 
  • Stridor; 
  • Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus; 
  • Subacute endocarditis; 
  • Subacute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; 
  • Subclavian artery embolism; 
  • Subclavian artery thrombosis; 
  • Subclavian vein thrombosis; 
  • Sudden unexplained death in epilepsy; 
  • Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis; 
  • Susac's syndrome; 
  • Suspected COVID- 19; 
  • Swelling; 
  • Swelling face; 
  • Swelling of eyelid; 
  • Swollen tongue; 
  • Sympathetic ophthalmia; 
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus; 
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index abnormal; 
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index decreased; 
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index increased; 
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus rash; 
  • Systemic scleroderma; 
  • Systemic sclerosis pulmonary; 
  • Tachycardia; 
  • Tachypnoea; 
  • Takayasu's arteritis; 
  • Temporal lobe epilepsy; 
  • Terminal ileitis; 
  • Testicular autoimmunity; 
  • Throat tightness; 
  • Thromboangiitis obliterans; 
  • Thrombocytopenia; 
  • Thrombocytopenic purpura; 
  • Thrombophlebitis;  
  • Thrombophlebitis migrans; 
  • Thrombophlebitis neonatal; 
  • Thrombophlebitis septic; 
  • Thrombophlebitis superficial; 
  • Thromboplastin antibody positive; 
  • Thrombosis; 
  •  Thrombosis corpora cavernosa; 
  • Thrombosis in device; 
  • Thrombosis mesenteric vessel; 
  • Thrombotic cerebral infarction; 
  • Thrombotic microangiopathy; 
  • Thrombotic stroke; 
  • Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; 
  • Thyroid disorder; 
  • Thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin increased; 
  • Thyroiditis; 
  • Tongue amyloidosis; 
  • Tongue biting; 
  • Tongue oedema; 
  • Tonic clonic movements; 
  • Tonic convulsion; 
  • Tonic posturing; 
  • Topectomy; 
  • Total bile acids increased; 
  • Toxic epidermal necrolysis; 
  • Toxic leukoencephalopathy; 
  • Toxic oil syndrome; 
  • Tracheal obstruction; 
  • Tracheal oedema; 
  • Tracheobronchitis; 
  • Tracheobronchitis mycoplasmal; 
  • Tracheobronchitis viral; 
  • Transaminases abnormal; 
  • Transaminases increased; 
  • Transfusion-related alloimmune neutropenia; 
  • Transient epileptic amnesia; 
  • Transverse sinus thrombosis; 
  • Trigeminal nerve paresis; 
  • Trigeminal neuralgia; 
  • Trigeminal palsy; 
  • Truncus coeliacus thrombosis; 
  • Tuberous sclerosis complex; 
  • Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome; 
  • Tumefactive multiple sclerosis; 
  • Tumour embolism; 
  • Tumour thrombosis; 
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus; 
  • Type I hypersensitivity; 
  • Type III immune complex mediated reaction; 
  • Uhthoff's phenomenon; 
  • Ulcerative keratitis; 
  • Ultrasound liver abnormal; 
  • Umbilical cord thrombosis; 
  • Uncinate fits; 
  • Undifferentiated connective tissue disease; 
  • Upper airway obstruction; 
  • Urine bilirubin increased; 
  • Urobilinogen urine decreased; 
  • Urobilinogen urine increased; 
  • Urticaria; 
  • Urticaria papular; 
  • Urticarial vasculitis; 
  • Uterine rupture; 
  • Uveitis; 
  • Vaccination site thrombosis; 
  • Vaccination site vasculitis; 
  • Vagus nerve paralysis; 
  • Varicella; 
  • Varicella keratitis; 
  • Varicella post vaccine; 
  • Varicella zoster gastritis; 
  • Varicella zoster oesophagitis; 
  • Varicella zoster pneumonia; 
  • Varicella zoster sepsis; 
  • Varicella zoster virus infection; 
  • Vasa praevia; 
  • Vascular graft thrombosis; 
  • Vascular pseudoaneurysm thrombosis; 
  • Vascular purpura; 
  • Vascular stent thrombosis; 
  • Vasculitic rash; 
  • Vasculitic ulcer; 
  • Vasculitis; 
  • Vasculitis gastrointestinal; 
  • Vasculitis necrotising; 
  • Vena cava embolism; 
  • Vena cava thrombosis; 
  • Venous intravasation; 
  • Venous recanalisation; 
  • Venous thrombosis; 
  • Venous thrombosis in pregnancy; 
  • Venous thrombosis limb; 
  • Venous thrombosis neonatal; 
  • Vertebral artery thrombosis; 
  • Vessel puncture site thrombosis; 
  • Visceral venous thrombosis; 
  • VIth nerve paralysis; 
  • VIth nerve paresis; 
  • Vitiligo; 
  • Vocal cord paralysis; 
  • Vocal cord paresis; 
  • Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease; 
  • Warm type haemolytic anaemia; 
  • Wheezing; 
  • White nipple sign; 
  • XIth nerve paralysis; 
  • X-ray hepatobiliary abnormal; 
  • Young's syndrome; 
  • Zika virus associated Guillain Barre syndrome.
Despite this huge list of adverse reactions, which Pfizer knows about, if you want more evidence of the dangers of their vaccines go to this Canadian Covid Care Alliance website, and this well-researched article, which deals with the inadequate testing, as well as the adverse reactions it causes.
 

So can this vaccine really be described as "safe", as the general public have been so often told?

And is it any wonder that many people want to remain "vaccine free"?



Friday, 9 July 2021

Covid-19 Vaccines. The MSM Information Blight? A complaint to our 'Public Service' broadcaster, the BBC

I refer you to my previous blog to the UK's Department of Health in which I explain how medical authorities are not informing the general public about the serious adverse reactions, and patient harm, that is being cause by the Covid-19 vaccines. 

The same applies to the mainstream media (MSM) who are failing to inform us about what is being officially reported on the Government website by the UK's drug regulator, the MHRA.

This is the preamble, taken from yesterday's blog.

    "A large, and growing proportion of the UK population has now received either one or two doses of one of the experimental Covid-19 vaccines. I suspect that the vast majority of these people did so on the basis of what they had been told about them - by the Department of Health, the NHS, and the mainstream media (MSM) - that these vaccines were effectively safe, and would not cause serious patient harm.

    "Official statistics, data coming from the UK's drug regulator, the MHRA, and published on the UK Governments website, suggest that this is not the case.

    "The evidence is that the vaccines are causing serious patient harm, with over 1 million side effects being reported by nearly 300,000 patients. This includes reactions such as severe allergic reactions, anaphylaxis, Bell's Palsy, blood clots, cerebral venous sins thrombosis (CVST), Capillary Leak Syndrome, menstrual disorders and vaginal bleeding, Myocarditis and Pericarditis (inflammation of the heart), and fatalities. Indeed the latest MHRA data shows that there have been 1,403 reported deaths of patients shortly after they have been given one of the Covid-19 vaccines.

    "The weekly MHRA review consistently discounts the seriousness of these reported 'side effects', even though its primary function as a drug regulator should be to protect patients from drug and vaccine-induced harm. It is well known that side effects reported to the drug regulator represents only a small proportion of actual side effects - research has shown this to be somewhere between 1% and 10%. So 1,403 death could actually be 14,030 deaths, or as many as 140,300 deaths.

    "I cannot think of any other walk of life where such harm could be caused, or even suspected to be caused, without a serious and immediate "Health and Safety" response. An industry that causes serious harm to its workers, or its customers, would be subject to rigorous examination and inspection. A restaurant suspected of causing food poisoning would be closed down. A road junction where there had been numerous accidents would have been subject to increased traffic regulation.

    "But this does not happen when pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines cause public harm. "All drugs cause side effects" we are told blandly by doctors and drug regulators; and it is left at that. There has been no public warning from government, from the NHS, or from the MSM. They continue to tell us that the vaccines are safe; and urge everyone to take the vaccine, without informing us about these reported side effects.

The BBC is the UK's "public service" broadcaster. It has a primary responsibility to inform the general public, who also funds it through the licence fee, about important official statistics, perhaps more so than any other mainstream media (MSM) outlet. The BBC has totally failed to mention these officially reported 'side effects' for the last 6-7 months. Consequently I have complained to the BBC and asked them to respond to the following questions.

1. Can the BBC confirm that MHRA statistics, relating to Covid-19 vaccines and published on this Government website, comes from official government source, and does not constitute "anti-vaxxer" disinformation?

2. Can the BBC confirm that, up to 23rd June 2021, the MHRA, the UK's drug regulator, has received over 1 million reports of serious side effects, including 1,403 reports of patients dying shortly after receiving one of the Covid-19 vaccines?

3. Can the BBC inform me how many deaths and/or serious adverse reactions, either caused or suspected to be caused by a pharmaceutical drug, it considers necessary before it takes action to inform the general public?

4. Can the BBC tell me when, and how it has been informing the general public of these serious adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines as reported by the MHRA? In particular, can the BBC provide me with the information it has given to its viewers, listeners, readers about these MHRA statistics during the last 6-7 months?

5. Can the BBC tell me how knowledge of these official statistics has modified the BBC's stance on the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines, and its decision to promote them as entirely safe to the general public?

6. How does the BBC seek to ensure that the general public, and licence fee payers, are in future provided with full information about the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines before it recommends and promotes them, so that its viewers, listeners and readers are able to make a balanced and informed decision?

7. Can the BBC inform me about any action it has taken to verify and investigate these serious adverse vaccine reactions, and in particular to interview the family and friends of those people who have died shortly after the Covid-19 vaccination?

8. Can the BBC assure me that before more people receive a Covid-19 vaccine it will begin to inform the general public and licence payers about official reported adverse reactions, and in particular that 1,403 people have died shortly after after taking the vaccine?

Doubtless it will take several weeks for any response to be forthcoming from the BBC. When this is received I will immediately reproduce their response, here, in full; alongside my response to their response!

So watch this space!

14th July 2021

Thank you for watching this space! I have now received a response to my complaint from the BBC, and as promised I am reproducing it here, in full.

    "Thank you for contacting us with your concerns about BBC News coverage of Covid-19 vaccines. We have published a number of articles about the common side effects, such as the one below. The article also contains further links to earlier pieces we have written about side effects:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56901356

Another article we'd like to highlight is the one below from 3 April. On that day the MHRA published its weekly yellow card report and did not include the data on deaths. We pressed them for further information and it was only then that they revealed that seven people had died after receiving the Astra Zeneca jab and we reported this:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56620646

Yellow card reports of serious side effects have to be investigated and it isn’t always possible to establish a link with vaccinations. When there is evidence that serious side effects are considered likely to have been caused by the vaccine, we have reported the risks clearly and responsibly.

This piece outlines that it isn’t always easy to establish if a serious illness is coincidence or caused by a vaccine: 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55216047

As we have imported, a member of BBC staff is suspected of dying from vaccine-related causes:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-57267169

You might also be interested in these articles:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-57677606

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-57584775

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-57173286

We do value your feedback about this. All complaints are sent to senior management and we’ve included your points in our overnight report. These reports are among the most widely read sources of feedback in the company and ensures that your concerns have been seen by the right people quickly. This helps inform their decisions about current and future content.

 

So they thanked me for 'sharing my views'. So as I also promised I will now respond to their response! You will see that the BBC Complaints unit has not answered most of my questions.

Q1. The BBC did not confirm that the MHRA statistics came from an official government source, and did not constitute "anti-vaxxer" disinformation.

Q2. The BBC did not confirm that that the MHRA has received over 1 million reports of serious side effects, including 1,403 reports of patients dying shortly after receiving one of the Covid-19 vaccines. They say they knew of 7 deaths in April 2021: but by then the MHRA had reported many, many more than 7 deaths.

Q3. The BBC did not inform me about how many reported deaths and/or serious adverse reactions were necessary before it took action to inform the general public. It appears that they are content that they reported on 7 of the 1,403 deaths.

Q4. The BBC's response outlines what they have done to to inform the general public about these serious adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines. It is clearly inadequate. They referred to 7 published articles which I hope you will take the time to read: not because of the information they contain, but the lack of information, the lack of any understanding of how serious the problems are, and how they constantly discount the seriousness of the data - always content to use the arguments of the conventional medical establishment (CME). The BBC has clearly NEVER the accumulating MHRA statistics on deaths and serious adverse vaccine reactionsthat have been available to them during the last 6-7 months.

  • They reported on a BBC staff member who died following a Covid vaccine: please note that they stated in this article (May 2021) that her death would be 'probed': two months later there has been no evidence of any probe!
  • They have reported on just one death in Northern Ireland.
  • They reported on just three deaths in Scotland.
  • For each of these the BBC articles have argued that (i) there was no proven link to the vaccine, (ii) the benefits outweigh the risks; (iii) it was still important that people got the vaccine -  and of course they have continued to support and promote the vaccines on behalf of the drug companies.
  • They continue to discount the seriousness of the potential link between the vaccines and patient harm, content to accept and repeat at face value the usual arguments of the CHE.

Q5. The BBC did not respond to whether MHRA's official statistics had modified the BBC's stance on the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines, or its decision to promote them as entirely safe to the general public. So it quite clearly has not done so. According to the BBC the Covid-19 vaccines are safe, and MHRA data does not change their opinion on this.

Q6. Nor did the BBC response say how it sought to ensure that the general public were in future provided with full information about the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines before continuing to recommend and promote them so that people were more able to make a more balanced and informed decision.

  • The BBC's response suggests that they believe these 7 articles, published over a period of 8 months, have been sufficient to inform the general public about 1,403 deaths, and over 1 million reports of side effects.
  • Indeed, the BBC seems content to discount any patient harm caused by the vaccines, and regardless of MHRA data, to continue urging everyone to take the vaccine.

Q7. The BBC did not inform me about any action they had taken to verify and investigate the serious adverse vaccine reactions revealed by the MHRA statistics. Even in the 7 articles they referred to the main focus was clearly to heavily discount even the few deaths, and adverse reactions they have mentioned. Each one of these 'statistics' is a human tragedy, but they have not seen fit to verify, publicise, or investigate the trauma 'side effects' cause; they have made no attempt to interview grieving families, or the friends of the people who have died following vaccination.

Q8. The BBC's response has failed to assure me that it will begin to inform the general public about officially reported adverse reactions - before more people suffer from them.

  • When I wrote my complaint 1,403 people had been reported as dying shortly after after taking the vaccine. Since then this figure has risen to 1,440 - with another report due to be made in two days time. So 37 more people have died unaware that the official data that the BBC refuses to publicise.
  • The BBC is still informing us, each and  every day, about deaths caused by the virus (or more accurately deaths that follow within 28 days after a positive Covid-19 test). They do not discount this figure - no suggestion that most of these deaths are people who had serious underlying health conditions - no caveat linking these deaths to the virus.

There is nothing in these 7 BBC articles that constitutes an adequate warning to the general public that 1,440 people have been reported as dying shortly after the vaccination, that far from the vaccine being safe 'death' was a possible side effect. And no mention either that it is well known that only 1% of adverse drug/vaccine reactions are ever reported!

There is nothing in the BBC's response to my complaint that suggests they are aware, or even want to be aware, of the seriousness of this situation. The response is disinterested. It defends their stance without any attempt at justifying it. The BBC are clearly satisfied with the dismissive explanations of the CHE.

The BBC regularly and exclusively interviews and quotes members of the conventional medical profession - the "experts". Yet these "experts" are the very same people who support these vaccines; who encourage people to get vaccinated; who are culpable of telling us that the vaccines are "safe". What, then, is the likelihood of any of these "experts" performing a volte face, agreeing that the vaccines they said were safe are not safe, that they have serious side effects they have not told us about, that 1,440 people have been reported as dying from these 'safe' vaccines?

There is a further concern about the BBC's handling of the pandemic - their feeble acceptance of CME excuses for not informing the general public about official MHRA data. In what other walk of life would the BBC be aware that 1,440 people have died, and many others have suffered serious harm, without looking beyond the explanations given by those who are closely implicated to the situation? There appears to be one rule for the CME, and another for every other industry.

This BBC response to my complaint  is confirmation that it has become the mouthpiece of the CME, the willing promoter of pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines. Conventional medicine can kill, it can cause serious illness and disease; but the BBC meekly accepts any explanation/excuse the CME comes up with. It does not question. It has failed to ask members of the CME who have an alternative (more critical) view. It declines to interview the victims, or their families. It just carries on justify and promote harmful/lethal medical treatments.

I will respond to the BBC's response, but without any expectation that this 'public service' broadcaster will change its mind, and accept its responsibility to the general public. After all, this would mean they would not have to do the same thing as our doctors - admit they have been promoting unsafe, experimental vaccines, that they were wrong, that people have suffered, many have died. And that this has happened as a direct consequence of the BBC's failure to tell us what we needed to know.


Thursday, 8 July 2021

Covid-19 Vaccines. Reported Adverse Reactions and Questions to Department of Health

A large, and growing proportion of the UK population has now received either one or two doses of one of the experimental Covid-19 vaccines. I suspect that the vast majority of these people did so on the basis of what they had been told about them - by the Department of Health, the NHS, and the mainstream media (MSM) - that these vaccines were effectively safe, with few side effects, and would not cause serious patient harm.

Official statistics, data coming from the UK's drug regulator, the MHRA, and published on the UK Governments website, suggest that this is not the case.

The evidence is that the vaccines are causing serious patient harm, with over 1 million side effects being reported by nearly 300,000 patients. This includes reactions such as severe allergic reactions, anaphylaxis, Bell's Palsy, blood clots, cerebral venous sins thrombosis (CVST), Capillary Leak Syndrome, menstrual disorders and vaginal bleeding, Myocarditis and Pericarditis (inflammation of the heart), and fatalities. Indeed the latest MHRA data show that there have been 1,403 reported deaths of patients shortly after they have been given one of the Covid-19 vaccines.

The MHRA, in its regular report, consistently discounts the seriousness of these reported 'side effects', even though its primary function as a drug regulator should be to protect patients from drug and vaccine-induced harm. It is well known that reported side effects represent a small proportion of actual side effects - research has shown this to be somewhere between 1% and 10%. So 1,403 death could actually be 14,030 deaths, or as many as 140,300 deaths.

I cannot think of any other walk of life where such harm could be caused, or even suspected to be caused, without a serious and immediate "Health and Safety" response. An industry that cause serious harm to its workers, or its customers, would be subject to rigorous examination and inspection. A restaurant suspected of causing food poisoning would be closed down. A road junction where there had been numerous accidents would have been subject to increased traffic regulation.

But this does not happen when such health and safety problem relates to the harm caused by pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines. "All drugs cause side effects" we are told blandly by doctors and drug regulators; and it is left at that. There has been no public warning from government, from the NHS, or from the MSM. They continue to tell us that the vaccines are safe; and urge everyone to take the vaccine, without any knowledge of the reported side effects.

So I have decided to write to my MP, so that he can ask the following questions of the UK's Department of Health.

1. Can the Department of Health confirm that MHRA statistics relating to Covid-19 vaccines contained on this Government website come from official data, and does not constitute "anti-vaxxer" disinformation?

2. Can the Department of Health confirm that, up to 23rd June 2021, the MHRA has received 1,403 reports of patients dying shortly after receiving one of the Covid-19 vaccines?

3. Can the Department of Health provide me with information about how it has been, and is informing the general public, either through the NHS, or the mainstream media, of all these serious adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines, including death, as reported to the MHRA?

4. Can the Department of Health inform me how many deaths (caused, or suspected to be caused, by these vaccines, or any pharmaceutical drug) it considers acceptable before you respond with appropriate health and safety measures that ensure the general public is made aware of the situation, can make an informed decision about taking the vaccines, and ensure that further deaths are avoided?

5. Can the Department of Health inform me what precautionary measures it has already taken to ensure that people who take the vaccines are not dying as the result?

6. Can the Department of Health provide me with the information it is giving to patients taking a Covid-19 vaccine, and what guidance vaccination staff have about the information they give to patients?

7. Can the Department of Health assure me that everyone receiving a Covid-19 vaccine is being informed that to date 1,403 people have died shortly after taking the vaccine

It is likely to be several weeks before any response is forthcoming from the Health Department. When I receive their response I will publish it here, in full, alongside my response to the adequacy of their response.

So watch this space!

Postscript August 2021

I eventually received a response to my 6 questions, in a letter from the Department of Health and Social Care, dated 20th July 2021. I have copied that letter, word for work, below. But as you will see it does not provide answers for any of them. My questions were very clearly about deaths reported to the MHRA as being caused by the vaccine - not by the virus. It is clear that whoever answered these questions (the letter is signed by Lord Bethell) did not read the questions; and has no doubt provided me with a proforma answer about questions concerned with deaths caused by the virus. For what it is worth, this was the response.

    "I appreciate Mr Scrutton's concerns. Deaths reported by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) are based on the cause of death recorded on death certificates. These can include cases where the doctor thought it likely that the person had COVID-19, even when there was no positive test result.

    "The deaths reported by the ONS will include deaths that are not included in the Public Health England (PHE) definition, which is that a positive test result was confirmed by a PHE or NHS laboratory. They may also exclude cases that are included in the PHE definition because, although the patient had a positive test for COVID-29, this was not mentioned on the death certificate. However, in generally, the numbers of deaths reported by the ONS will be larger than those included in the PHE definition. More information on the PHE definition can be found at www.gov.uk by searching for COVIC-19 investigation and initial clinical management of possible cases.

    "All the deaths data shown on coronavirus.date.gov.uk are for people who have had a positive test restult confirmed by a PHE or NHS laboratory. They also include, for England, deaths of people who have had a positive test resut confirmed through testing done by commercial partners.

    "The data does not include deaths of people who had COVID-19 but had not been tested, people who tested positive only via a non-NHS or PHE laboratory, or people who had tested negative and subsequently caught the virus and died. People who have tested positive for COVID-19 could, in some cases, have died from something else. Death are only included in these figures if they occur within 28 days of a positive test. This makes the recording more accurate because cases where a person has tested positive but then died from other causes some months later are excluded.

    "Data on COVID-19 deaths in England are produced by PHE. These data are taken from three different sources:

  • NHS England deaths in hospitals are reported by NHS trusts, using the COVID-19 Patient Notification System;
  • PHE Health Protection Teams: the local teams report deaths notified to them, which will mainly be death not in hospitals; and
  • linking data on confirmed positive cases to the NHS Demographic Batch Service: when a patient dies, the NHS central register of patients is notified. The list of all lab-confirmed cases is checked against the NHS central register each day, to check if any of the patients have died.

    "Data on deaths from these three sources are linked to the list of people who have had a diagnosis of COVID-19 confirmed by a PHE or NHS laboratory. This is to identify as many people with a confirmed case who have died as possible.

    "Notifications of deaths will often come from more than one source, so the records are checked and merged into one database and duplicates are removed. Automated processes are used to ensure that the data are as complete as possible. Full details of the process of producing the data are available on coronavirus.data.gov.uk/about-data. As referred to above, deaths that occured more than 28 days after a positive test are removed. 

    "This final list of deaths therefore includes all those previously reported by NHS England, and those that were confirmed cases, whether they died in hospital or elsewhere, provided death occurred with 28 days of a test.

     "With regard to annual death rates over the last six years, these canbe found on the ONS website at www.ons.gov.uk by searching for 'Deaths in the UK from 1990 to 2020.

    "Additional, Mr Scrutton can make a Freedom of Information (FOI) request by going to www.ons.gov.uk and searching for 'Freedom of Information'.

    "I hope this reply is helpful.

The reply is not helpful in any regard because has answered questions that I did not ask! Is the response deliberate obfuscation, and attempt not to answer questions about the harm being cause by the Covid-19 vaccines? When I asked the question 1.403 people had been reporting as dying soon after receiving the vaccines. That figure has since risen to 1,536.

In any case I will now write back to my MP, ask him to ask the questions again, and suggests that he advises Lord Bethell to actually reads the questions before his next response.

So once again, I will await an answer - and post them here. So again, watch this space.