We don't know; we are not being told, and they are refusing to tell us. So where does that leave Health Freedom, and Patient Choice?
It's message is simple and straightforward.
“UK health officials have refused to reveal the number of people who died after a Covid jab as it might deter others from taking it”.
The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) used to publish these figures. I used to follow them regularly throughout 2020 and 2021. I suspect that government initially thought the data would demonstrate that the vaccine was saving lives, as they had promised us, ad infinitum. But as soon as it became clear that the mass vaccination campaign was increasing death they stopped publishing it.
But is this statement correct? Is this the reason? Or am I peddling disinformation? Well, we don’t know! Why? We are not being allowed to see the data!
Apparently the data is still being collected as it being released ‘privately’ to vaccine manufacturers. But they have “resisted requests from MPs and pressure groups to publish them”. So its just us that we are not allowed to see it!
The WDDTY article says that the pressure group “USForThem” requested the information. They were told by UKHSAS, backed up by the Information Commissioner, that the data “could lead to misinformation” that would “have an adverse impact on vaccine uptake” by the public. They also said that publishing the data risked damaging the well-being and mental health of the families and friends of people who died.
How can data lead to misinformation? It’s data!
And the family and friends of the people who died have already been traumatised. So, in the interests of their well-being and mental health, have they been told? Or was it considered best that they remained ignorant of the cause of their bereavement?
Above all where does this leave Health Freedom and Patient Choice? When anyone is offered a pharmaceutical drug or vaccine the decision we must make is whether to take it or not. If we are to make an ‘informed’ choice patients require full and honest information, and this is made impossible by refusal to publish relevant data.
Throughout the Pandemic, the government, the drug companies, doctors, the mainstream media, et al, all combined to tell us that the Covid-19 vaccines were “safe and effective”.
So I have little doubt that dying from a “safe and effective” vaccine would, as sure as eggs are eggs, “have an adverse impact on vaccine uptake” - and so it should!
Ben Kingsley, the legal director of “UsForThem” is quoted in ther WDDTY article:
“You have to ask yourself why it is that the public are considered incapable of handling this data. It reveals a patronising mindset, which also characterised the pandemic response: “do what we say, don’t ask any questions, we know what is best for you”.
And it is this patronising mindset that encourages me to ask 3 wider questions.
Just what else are we not being told about pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines “as it might deter others from taking it”?
Is the reluctance to provide the data more to do with their embarrassment than our discouragement?
And is the governmental decision not to release the data more to do with the powerful pharmaceutical lobby, and their promise to invest heavily in the UK?
