A case of Phlebitis, cured with Homeopathy, but then denied by conventional doctors

This is a story of homeopathy successfully treating an illness, Phlebitis, which had been formally diagnosed by conventional medical staff, but who were not treating is successfully. Once the condition had improved with homeopathy, a doctor and a specialist refused to accept that homeopathy could have any affect on the condition, so the answer must be that she never had the condition - it had been wrong diagnosed! Such is the denial of the conventional medical establishment.

It was July 2004 when Catherine (not her real name) came to see me. She was 79 years old. The condition she wanted me to treat had been diagnosed as Phlebitis, and her doctor was treating it, but she said without much success. She was going to see the practice nurse after our appointment. She was having her leg bandaged.

Catherine showed me her problem left leg. It had a thick dark mark running down it from several inches below her knee to her ankle. She complained of shooting pains, upwards from her ankle to her calf, which led to an aching pain. Her ankles were swollen ankles. Although in the morning she could be free of pain the shooting pain could happen any time, and the aching gets worse as day goes by. By the evening they became unbearable, and she had to sit with her feet up, which she did dislike as she  enjoys being active. She also complained of itching. Her leg generated heat. There was no ulceration. Walking was painful, but the pain tended to ease with exercise. Her other leg was not painful, although she had varicose veins in both legs for 25-30 years.

Catherine was also on conventional drugs, Losatin (for high blood pressure) and Pesentin (for a mini-stroke she had 2-3 years earlier). She also took aspirin for the arthritis in her right knee, and had regular flu vaccinations. But it was the pain that she wanted me to treat. It was becoming unbearable.

I saw Catherine again on 5th August 2004. The condition had not improved but she said that she was beginning to feel better "within herself". One thing that homeopathy teaches you is that feeling better, or stronger, or having more energy is often a precursor to the body getting stronger, and so getting more able to cope with physical conditions like phlebitis. So I decided to stick with the remedy I had been giving her - Hamamelis (made from Witch Hazel). I also looked at the side effects of one of the drug she was taking, Losartan, and wondered whether this might be causing or aggravating the condition. I decided to make a potentized remedy from the drug to see if this helped.

On 17th August 2004 Cathering phone me to say she had been given new drug, Arthrotec. She had taken a few of these, but had stopped as they gave her indigestion. But she was unsure whether this was making her leg better, or whether it was the homeopathic remedies. She said that the leg was looking better, and there was less pain. I asked her to continue taking the remedies as I had asked.

On 16th September 2004 we met again. Her leg was feeling much better, there was only a slight residual pain now. She also said her arthritis was a little better too, and wondered whether I had treated this too. I told her that I was treating her, and not any specific condition.

Ten days later, on 26th September 2004, Catherine phoned again. She has been to her hospital appointment, but the specialist told her that it could not have been Phlebitis, it had been something else. She had also told them that I had given her a homeopathic Losartin, but they said that this had no connection with her conditionHe had given it a name, but she could not remember what it was. Her leg, she said, was "not too bad, not much pain, but she still knows it is there".

Our next meeting was on 18th November 2004, Catherine confirmed that both her doctor, and her specialist had told  her that it was not Phlebitis that she had! She reflected that she had always been well, until she turned 75, when she started taking pharmaceutical drugs for high blood pressure. It was shortly after this that she had a mini-stroke. And then she began to suffer from a series of conditions.

Catherine had no pain at all, except for an occasional twinge. She wondered what the condition was that had caused so much pain. I asked her whether it mattered. Her doctor had called it phlebitis. Her specialist had contradicted the diagnosis. But the real point was, surely, that she was now free of pain, however the pain was diagnosed. I told her that the main remedy she had used, Hamamelis, was a well known, and often used remedy for Phlebitis, but if conventional medicine wanted to diagnose it with some other name, it made little difference.

Driving home I smiled, and shook my head. Conventional medicine had proved ineffective. Homeopathy had worked. So, faced with this, two doctors had preferred to admit that their diagnosis had been wrong rather than to acknowledge that homeopathy had worked.

For a comparison between the homeopathic and conventional treatment of Phlebitis, please go to this 'Why Homeopathy?' link.

Homeopathy and Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)

Homeopaths routinely treat patients with every imaginable kind of illness and disease. We have done so since the end of the 18th century, safely, effectively and inexpensively.

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is just one disease that homeopathy can treat, and indeed, does so regularly, particularly when patients ask us do so after realising that conventional medicine has only harmful and dangerous drugs to use.

This has become an ongoing problem for conventional, drug/vaccine based medicine. Their treatments are largely ineffective, especially over the long-term, often harmful, sometimes dangerous, and increasingly proving to be lethal to some patients.

• Iatrogenic disease is reaching epidemic proportions. 
• Iatrogenic death is now probably the leading cause of death in the USA and Europe, where conventional medicine is dominant.

The problem for conventional medicine, and their supporters, is that they do not want anyone to realise this, and therefore they go to great lengths both to deny it, and to ensure that we do not find out.

One of the primary tasks of this 'Safe Medicine' blog is to inform about the dangers of conventional drugs and vaccines. So it upsets some supporters of conventional medicine, and I am pleased to say, informs and surprises many, many more people.

The other purpose of the blog is to emphasise that safer and more effective medical therapies are available to patients. And again, the conventional medical establishment would prefer that people did not know this either!

Therefore, when I tweeted an article on Deep Vein Thrombosis and Homeopathic Treatment yesterday 17 August 2016), I received a tirade of abuse from 'medical fundamentalists". This is not unusual. I receive abuse from them on a daily basis! Their tweets are immediately junked. Yet the response to this single tweet has been quite extraordinary! Thus far I have received 61 tweets, abusive either to me, to homeopathy, or both!

So immediately I realised I had hit a nerve.  This delighted me. It means that as far as these 'medical fundamentalists' are concerned I am doing my job properly! But it was a surprise to get so much abuse from them. What was it about the treatment of DVT with homeopathy that has triggered such a hostile response. After writing this blog I am going to find out, and write about it! My conclusions will be published to my "Why Homeopathy?" website.

(The link is now active, and gives rise to the question - how can these medical fundamentalists claim the homeopathy can kill as a result of not accepting conventional treatment, when the pharmaceutical drugs for treating DVT are so dangerous)! 

A Case of Phlebitis
Yet I was not entirely surprised at the reaction. When I was practicing homeopathy I treated a woman who suffered with Phlebitis, the inflation of the veins, often cause by a blood clot forming in a vein, so a similar condition to DVT. She had received every kind of conventional medication, yet she continued to suffer considerable pain and discomfort. The condition had been diagnosed by her GP. She her hospital specialist had confirmed the diagnosis. Indeed, she was due to have an operation. Instead I treated her for about 3 months, if I recall, with the remedy Hamamelis Virginiana, after which she was free of pain. She then saw her specialist, who announced to her that homeopathy could not treat the condition, and that the condition must have been 'misdiagnosed'! The operation was cancelled. My patient laughed when she told me about this duplicity. I laughed along with her, but underneath, I quietly seethed. This was all part of the misinformation game, the denial the conventional medicine plays all the time with patients, who are told that only their treatment works (except that it didn't), and no other treatment can work (but homeopathy did)!

As far as the conventional treatment of DVT is concerned, conventional medicine uses only drugs that are dangerous to our health. They are best avoided. And homeopathy can provide a safer, and more effective therapy for patients.