THE HPV VACCINES. Doctors insist they are safe, that our daughters should be vaccinated. So what does the Patient Information Leaflet say?

The HPV vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, have been described as "the world's most dangerous vaccine". Yet our doctors, and conventional medicine generally, continues to insist that HPV vaccines are very safe. So who is right? And in particular, does the conventional medical establishment actually know that this vaccine is causing harm to patients - as it is actually in their medical literature - and they are not telling us the whole truth?

Since 2006 conventional medicine has offered the HPV vaccine to all girls, from age 12 to 18. The human papillomavirus (HPV) is a common group of viruses that have been linked to several types of cancer, and the vaccine is supposed to protect young girls from cervical cancer, but also from rarer HPV-related cancers like anal and genital cancers, and cancers of the head and neck.

First, why has the HPV vaccine been described as "the world's most dangerous vaccine"? I was able to write this about the vaccine in September 2013, that is, a mere seven years after its introduction, and five years after its introduction in the UK. This is what I wrote.

     "It  has been calculated that 1,700 young girls have been killed or suffered permanent disability after being given the HPV vaccine, and a further 19,500 young girls have suffered 'non-serious' reactions. 

http://www.wddty.com/safe-hpv-vaccine-kills-up-to-1-700-young-girls.html

     Further, this article provides VAERS (US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) statistics showing that the HPV vaccine has caused the following adverse reactions in the USA:

• Deaths: 140
• Disabled: 952
• Did not recover: 6,032
• Abnormal pap smear: 531
• Cervical dysplasia: 214
• Cervical cancer: 64
• Life-threatening: 562
• ER visit: 10,557
• Hospitalized: 3,065
• Extended hospital stay: 234
• Serious: 4,091
• Adverse events: 30,352

In this 2013 blog "HPV Vaccine. We need to protect our daughters from this" I go into further detail of the dangers of the vaccine, including links to several actual cases of healthy young girls suffering serious, life threatening, and life transforming side effects including severe seizures, disability and death.

POSTSCRIPT (May 2019)
The manufacturer of Gardasil, Merck, has been formally accused of fraud and a host of other serious charges, including bribery, stealth marketing and 'hard selling' relating to this vaccine. 

Despite this, when we look at what the conventional medical establishment says about the safety of this vaccine, it remains very coy, and so far at least, it has been less inclined to be as honest about the dangers of HPV vaccine as they are now with the DPT vaccine, and the MMR vaccine (see both links to previous blogs).

So what does NHS says about the safety of HPV vaccines?
The NHS website, on its main pages on the HPV vaccines, demonstrates this coyness about the known side affects of the HPV vaccines. So, for instance, it begins by saying that

               "..... it's natural to be concerned that you or your child will have a side effect after having a vaccination. While all vaccines have the potential to cause side effects in some people, the reality is that most tend to be mild and do not last longer than a few days. Some people do not get any side effects at all." (my emphasis).

So the NHS website outlines a number of the more common, less serious side effects of the vaccine, which includes pain at the injection site, swelling and redness, high temperature, shivering, extreme tiredness (fatigue), headache, muscle and joint pain.

It then continues to list more serious side effects, each time describing them as 'rare', and discounting their seriousness in a number of ways. It says, for example, that to have a 'balanced' view, "the potential side effects have to be weighed against the expected benefits of vaccination in preventing the serious complications of disease" (my emphasis). 

The NHS also argues that not all illnesses that occur after vaccination will be a side effect, that as millions of people are vaccinated "it's inevitable that some will go on to develop a coincidental infection or illness shortly afterwards". So what are these 'coincidental infections or illness'?

• An immediate allergic reaction, or anaphylactic shock. It describes these as "dramatic and potentially life threatening" but then says that they are "very rare, occurring in less than 1 in a million cases, and are completely reversible if treated promptly by healthcare staff."

The Under-Reporting of Side Effects (thus making them 'Rare')

It is important to comment on the alleged frequency of these reported side effects. Several studies have calculated that only 10% of drug (and vaccine) side effects are ever reported. I wrote about this in this blog. What this means that 90% of side effects are not reported, so these 'rare' or 'uncommon' side effects are not 1 in 1,000 but 1 in 100, and 1 in 10,000 means 1 in 1,000!

Some studies indicate that 10% is actually an under-estimate, that a more accurate figure for under-reporting might be 1% - in other words that 99% of these 'rare' or 'uncommon' side effects remain unrecorded. This would mean that they happen in 1 in 100, or 1 in 10 vaccinated children.

On another NHS page there is more detail about the side effects of HPV vaccines, although it continues to discount their seriousness.

Very common side effects of the HPV vaccine

More than 1 in 10 people who have the Gardasil HPV vaccine experience:

• redness, swelling or pain at the site of the injection - the most common side effect, but it should wear off within a couple of days
• headaches - but these don't usually last very long. ( my emphasis)

Common side effects
More than 1 in 100 people, but less than 1 in 10, who have the Gardasil HPV vaccine experience:

• bruising or itching at the site of the injection
• a high temperature or feeling hot and shivery
• feeling sick (nausea)
• pain in the arms, hands, fingers, legs, feet or toes

Rare side effects
Around 1 in 10,000 people who have the Gardasil HPV vaccine experience:

• an itchy red rash (hives)

Very rare side effects
Less than 1 in 10,000 people who have the Gardasil HPV vaccine experience:

• difficulty breathing and restriction of the airways

Then more NHS coyness when they use what, to me, seems to be an entirely new defence of vaccine harm that discounts the importance of patient-reported side affects, favouring instead the evidence provided by 'medical science' in clinical trials.

               "People have reported other side effects, but because these come from people reporting side effects themselves rather than from controlled clinical tests, it's not possible to say how often they happen or to how many people." (My emphasis).

So after discounting them, the side effects of HPV vaccines that patients have reported are then listed as:

• bruising or bleeding more easily
• chills, weakness, tiredness or general feeling unwell
• swollen glands
• pain or tenderness in the joints or muscles
• being sick (vomiting)
• fits (seizures)

This is followed by yet more discounting when the NHS states that most of these symptoms are reported "after any kind of vaccination". This is a bit like saying that being knocked over by a Ford is acceptable, because other cars will do the same amount of damage! This highly defensive approach is at best suspicious, and at worst alarming. These are NOT minor side effects, they are serious, and should not be discounted in this way.

Patient Information Leaflets (PILS)
So what do the vaccine PILs, documents produced by the drug companies, say about the safety of these vaccines.

Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline)
The Cervarix PIL first outlines a long list of precautions and warnings about when the vaccine should not be taken - presumably because it would be unsafe to do so, and only the most healthy should have the vaccination.
          • if you are allergic to any of the active substances or any of the other ingredients of this vaccine (listed in section 6). Signs of an allergic reaction may include itchy skin rash, shortness of breath and swelling of the face or tongue.
          • if you have a bleeding problem or bruise easily.
          • if you have any disease which reduces your resistance to infection such as HIV infection.
          • if you have a severe infection with a high temperature. It might be necessary to postpone the vaccination until recovery. A minor infection such as a cold should not be a problem, but talk to the doctor first.

There then follows warnings about having the vaccine alongside other pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines, in pregnancy, when breastfeeding, or when driving or using machinery.

As far as side effects are concerned, there is the usual discounting of their seriousness - "all medicines can cause side effects, although not everybody gets them". These mirror the side effects already listed in the NHS webpage, but also include the following:
               • upper respiratory tract infection (infection of the nose, throat or trachea)
               • dizziness
               • other injection site reactions such as hard lump, tingling or numbness.
               • allergic reactions, including itchy rash on hands and feet, swelling of the eyes and face,
difficulty in breathing or swallowing, sudden drop in blood pressure and loss of consciousness.
               • swollen glands in the neck, armpit or groin
               • fainting sometimes accompanied by shaking or stiffness

Gardasil (Merck)
The Gardasil PIL provides very similar information to the Cervarix PIL, including several warnings and precautions about who should not have the vaccine. They should not be taken if:

               * you or your child is allergic (hypersensitive) to any of the active substances or any of the other ingredients of Gardasil (listed under “other ingredients”– see section 6).
               * you or your child developed an allergic reaction after receiving a dose of Gardasil.
               * you or your child suffer from an illness with high fever. However, a mild fever or upper
respiratory infection (for example cold) itself is not a reason to delay vaccination.
               * if you or your child has a bleeding disorder (a disease that makes you bleed more than normal), for example haemophilia
               * has a weakened immune system, for example due to a genetic defect, HIV infection or
medicines that affect the immune system.
               * Fainting, sometimes accompanied by falling, can occur (mostly in adolescents) following any needle injection.

The PIL, as usual, discounts the importance of the side effects of Gardasil, and then lists the following:

Very commonly (more than 1 in 10 patients), side effects found at the injection site include: pain,
swelling and redness. Headache was also seen.

Commonly (more than 1 in 100 patients), side effects found at the injection site include: bruising,
itching, pain in extremity. Fever and nausea have also been reported.

Rarely (less than 1 in 1000 patients): hives (urticaria).

Very rarely (less than 1 in 10,000 patients), difficulty breathing (bronchospasm) has been reported.

These side effects, apparently, were all noted in the clinical trials of Gardasil, and yet again the PIL discounts patient reports, despite the fact that patients are reporting actual side effects, actual patient harms, but this seems to be considered less important, less reliable, and less a matter of concern.

Side effects that have been reported during marketed use include:
Fainting, sometimes accompanied by shaking or stiffening, has been reported. Although fainting
episodes are uncommon, patients should be observed for 15 minutes after they receive HPV vaccine.

Allergic reactions that may include difficulty breathing, wheezing (bronchospasm), hives and rash
have been reported. Some of these reactions have been severe.

As with other vaccines, side effects that have been reported during general use include: 

• swollen glands (neck, armpit, or groin); 
• muscle weakness, 
• abnormal sensations, 
• tingling in the arms, 
• legs and upper body, or confusion (Guillain-Barré Syndrome, Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis); 
• dizziness, 
• vomiting, 
• joint pain, 
• aching muscles, 
• unusual tiredness or weakness, 
• chills, 
• generally feeling unwell, 
• bleeding or bruising more easily than normal, and 
• skin infection at the injection site.

What this demonstrates is that Conventional Medicine DOES know that HPV vaccines are harmful, but are reluctant to admit it until more evidence of harm is found.

So what are the side effects waiting to be found? The Drugs.com website provides details of all known Gardasil side effects, but in addition highlights several very serious side effects not mentioned by the NHS, or on the PIL. Anyone who is considering having this vaccine should visit and read this website, which is owned by a company controlled that are controlled by the pharmaceutical industry.

•     Anxiety
•     back, leg, or stomach pains
•     chest pain
•     difficulty with breathing
•     difficulty with swallowing
•     dizziness or lightheadedness
•     fast heartbeat
•     general body swelling
•     swollen, painful, or tender lymph glands in the neck, armpit, or groin
•     tenderness, pain, swelling, warmth, skin discoloration, and prominent superficial veins over the affected area
•     tightness in the chest
•     unusual tiredness or weakness
•     Diarrhoea
•     difficulty with moving
•     joint pain or swelling
•     muscle ache, cramps, pain, or stiffness
•     upper abdominal or stomach pain
•     Bloating
•     Constipation
•     Indigestion
•     pain, swelling, or redness at the injection site
•     pains in the stomach, side, or abdomen, possibly radiating to the back

The Drugs.com website also gives this information to healthcare professionals (which they will almost certainly not pass on to patients) - but it is quite horrendous.

• Injection site pruritus, injection site haematoma, injection site induration, injection site haemorrhage, injection site cellulitis
• Fatigue (54.6%), headache (53.4%), pyrexia (13%), fever of 99.5F or higher (12.9%)
• Chlamydia infection, malaise
• Asthenia, chills
• Myalgia (48.8%)
• Arthralgia (20.7%)
• Back pain
• Appendicitis, gastroenteritis
• Pancreatitis
• Respiratory
• Nasopharyngitis, oropharyngeal pain, influenza, cough, nasal congestion, upper respiratory tract infection, pharyngitis
• Pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, asthma
•  Bronchospasm
• Asthmatic crisis
• Pulmonary embolus
• Migraine
• Autoimmune disease

Drugs.com then go on to describe some 'postmarketing' reports of the following serious medical conditions.

• Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
• Guillain-Barre syndrome
• Motor neuron disease
• Paralysis
• Seizures
• Syncope (including syncope associated with tonic-clonic movements and other seizure-like activity) sometimes resulting in falling with injury
• Transverse myelitis

And then Drugs.com moves on to some "new medical conditions potentially indicative of systemic autoimmune disorders included:

• arthralgia/arthritis/arthropathy, 
• autoimmune thyroiditis, 
• celiac disease, 
• diabetes mellitus insulin dependent, 
• erythema nodosum, 
• hyperthyroidism, 
• hypothyroidism, 
• inflammatory bowel disease, 
• multiple sclerosis, 
• nephritis, 
• optic neuritis, 
• pigmentation disorder, 
• psoriasis, 
• Raynaud's phenomenon, 
• rheumatoid arthritis, 
• scleroderma/morphea, 
• Stevens-Johnson syndrome, 
• systemic lupus erythematosus, 
• uveitis, 
• alopecia areata, 
• ankylosing spondylitis, 
• autoimmune thrombocytopenia, 
• myocarditis, 
• proteinuria, 
• skin depigmentation, 
• dermatomyositis, 
• vasculitis, 
• vitiligo

And so it goes on listing the side effects of Gardasil that are really serious medical conditions, until we come to the most horrendous admission of all

DEATH

Drug.com also mentions death as a side effect, but it is said to be "uncommon" - just 0.1% to 1% - including deaths during clinical trials "which were generally assessed as not vaccine related".

In conclusion, I have called the reluctance of conventional medicine to highlight the known and serious side effects of HPV vaccines 'discounting' and 'coyness'. This is being generous. Doctors, after all, regularly tell us that these vaccines are safe. 

Do these known side effects appear 'safe' to you?

Remember, the most serious of these known side effects are not mentioned on the main NHS page at all, and most doctors certainly do not mention them when talking to the mainstream media, and presumably to their patients too.

And it must also be noted that neither the NHS, or the PILS, mention the side effects for which the USA's Vaccine Court is paying out massive compensation, including cervical dysplasia and cancer, hospitalisation, disability and death. These 'side effects' have been reported to VAERS (the USA's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System), and if $millions have been paid out in compensation by the USA government, they would have been reported to conventional medicine, and in particular to the drug regulators around the world.

So clearly, all these conditions, including the possibility of death, should be mentioned as a possible side effect by the NHS and in the PILS. But they is not. Is the conventional medical establishment 'discounting'? Are doctors being 'coy' with the information they are prepared to give patients? Can the information we are being given about HPV vaccines be considered to be accurate, or the whole truth?

Or is the information we are getting from the conventional medical establishment both deceptive, dishonest, and detrimental to human health and wellbeing?

HPV (Gardasil) vaccine. The most dangerous yet?

Perhaps the HPV vaccine has a lot of competition, but is the Gardasil, Cervarix vaccines the most dangerous to be imposed on us by the conventional medical establishment? 

Perhaps. But maybe the real problem is that this vaccine is given to strong healthy girls, who have proven their wellness and fitness for more than 10 years. Then, our lovely daughters were given the vaccine, and so often, their lives have been destroyed. 

In contrast to this, the DPT and MMR vaccines are given to very young babies and children. Parents might have thought they were normal during the first months of their lives, but perhaps they were mistaken. Perhaps they were not normal, and it was only after the vaccination that the 'abnormality' was noticed.

Just as the pharmaceutical companies had problems denying the outcome of Thalidomide, it is difficult for them to deny the dreadful consequences of taking the HPV vaccine.

And the flu vaccine is often given to older people, or people with respiratory problems. They might get ill after the vaccine, but they might have done anyway. And besides, our doctor, who we trust implicitly, told us that the vaccine was very safe! Who are we to question his judgement?

Yet this does not stop the pharmaceutical industry pushing the HPV vaccine, or governments throughout the world seeking to force it on us. For instance, the Australian government is trying to force our daughters to 'protect themselves' from cervical cancer, and giving their doctors financial incentives to do so. They are doing so as this is an important 'public health' measure. Well, we have heard it all before!

Yet, as Judy Wilyman reminds us, most infectious diseases had declined long before vaccines were introduced. It was basic health measures like better hygiene, clean water, improved diet and decent housing that contained them. Yet the Australian government is planning to expand vaccination to all individuals, with a schedule scanning from birth to death, and including the HPV vaccine. And new bio-security laws introduced in 2014 include forced vaccinations, or arrest in declared pandemics of infectious diseases. It is a land of milk and honey for drugs companies, but could herald the end of health freedom and patient choice.

Some governments have learnt from their mistake. The Japanese government, for instance, placed a moratorium on the use of HPV vaccine in 2014, and many other countries are considering similar action. Judy provides us with the following websites. 

• Gardasil The Carnage continues in France
• India: Supreme Court to Rule on Merck Fraud Regarding HPV Vaccine Deaths
• Spain: First case filed against HPV vaccine manufacturers and health authorities

Yet in truth there are a myriad of websites that speak volumes about the harm the HPV vaccine has caused - in statistical terms, in terms of the various ailments it has caused, from convulsions to paralysis, and most harrowingly of all, in terms of the sheer trauma and devastation caused to young girls, and their families. (For more information on this evidence, and a selection of websites, go to my previous blog, 'HPV vaccine. We need to protect our daughters from this').

So let's look at the conclusions reached on the harm caused by the HPV vaccine in this study, which looked at the latest information, and examined available epidemiological studies. This is the 'plain language' account given on the Med Check: the informed prescriber website.

          "Two HPV vaccines (Cervarix and Gardasil) have been marketed in Japan since 2010. More than 3 million girls were inoculated with HPV vaccines prior to the withdrawal of a recommendation for inoculation by the Japan's Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) in May 2013. 

          "Incidence of serious adverse reactions to Cervarix was 800 among 2.6 million girls inoculated (one in 3000 before withdrawal of the recommendation), while the incidence increased to 3.2% per year after the retraction, using the latest data (3,200 cases per 100,000 person years or one in 30 per year). This is similar to the frequency of serious adverse events within 1.2 years after the first vaccination (annual rate of 2.8%) reported in a well-controlled clinical study of Cervarix. In this study, annual incidence of serious reactions, autoimmune diseases and death after 3.4 years comparing with those between 1.2 and 3.4 years was estimated as 4%, 0.63% and more than one per thousand respectively. These incidence rates may also occur in Japan."  

          "The epidemiologic surveys that the MHLW used as evidence of safety have serious flaws in their methodologies. One study confuses incidence (newly occurred disease among a certain population at a certain point of time) with prevalence. The other two studies have a serious bias known as the “healthy vaccinee effects”. Those vaccinated are usually healthier than those non-vaccinated, because the latter group avoid vaccines due to health problems."

          "While there is no evidence yet that HPV vaccine decreases mortality from cervical cancer, if we assume that the vaccine could cut the cervical cancer mortality by half, the expected maximum benefit would be 2.0 less deaths per 100,000 person-years. Hence, the harm experienced is overwhelmingly greater than the expected maximum benefit."

We strongly recommend avoiding HPV vaccine.

I leave you with this devastating conclusion about a vaccine the conventional medical establishment is trying to force on us all, of course, with the assistance of compliant governments throughout the world.

HPV Vaccine. We need to protect our daughters from this

The HPV vaccine, Gardasil and Cervarix are the two main forms, is given to young girls aged 11 to 13 by the Conventional Medical Establishment to protect them from cervical cancer. But it is a vaccine that has never been proven to work, is not effective, in that it does not do what it says it will do, and worse - it harms, destroys and kills.

However, the conventional medical establishment, the NHS, and your GP are not telling us about any of this information about a vaccine that has been described "as the world's most dangerous vaccine". The official line continues to be that the vaccine is safe and effective. "According to government health authorities, medical 'experts,' and the pharmaceutical industry adverse events after vaccinations are extremely rare".

This is just not true. As the article in which this is quoted goes on to say, those who suffer adverse reactions, injury and even death, seem to be viewed as "acceptable collateral damage, nothing more than statistics". Indeed, this is the usual defence of all conventional drugs and vaccines that are known to cause patients harm, disease, and death - the 'advantages', we are told, outweigh 'the disadvantages'! But do they? Make up your own mind.

The Evidence that the vaccine kills.
It  has been calculated that 1,700 young girls have been killed or suffered permanent disability after being given the HPV vaccine, and a further 19,500 young girls have suffered 'non-serious' reactions.
http://www.wddty.com/safe-hpv-vaccine-kills-up-to-1-700-young-girls.html

Further, this article provides VAERS (US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) statistics showing that the HPV vaccine hase caused the following adverse reactions in the US:

Deaths: 140
Disabled: 952
Did not recover: 6,032
Abnormal pap smear: 531
Cervical dysplasia: 214
Cervical cancer: 64
Life-threatening: 562
ER visit: 10,557
Hospitalized: 3,065
Extended hospital stay: 234
Serious: 4,091
Adverse events: 30,352

The news from India, where Bill Gates is providing girls with the vaccine, is little better, with 7 known deaths being reported here. An Indian parliamentary panel has described the use of the HPV vaccine 'child abuse'.

Even one of the vaccine developers has spoken out against the vaccine, and the 44 girls who "are officially known to have died from these vaccines". This article also questions the seriousness of the cancer the vaccine is supposed to be addressing.

          "Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all H.P.V. infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years".

So we have a vaccine that kills in order to prevent a cancer that is not as serious as the Conventional Medical Establishment wants us to believe.

The Evidence that it harms and causes disease.
The evidence that the HPV vaccine causes immense harm has been growing since it was first used in 2006. Gaia Health has produced this article that states the vaccine has caused ovarian failure or destruction in 4 girls, and also many autoimmune disorders, citing:

          "… numerous cases substantiating the link between adverse immune reactions and HPV vaccines, including fatal reactions".

The vaccine has even been able to cause a "deadly new autoimmune disease known as antiphospholipid syndrome". So if this deadly HPV vaccine continues to be given to our young women, we may soon be hearing more of this 'new' disease, and no doubt Big Pharma companies will want to come up with some new drug or vaccine to treat it - a 'syndrome' which they created in the first place!

But in terms of the young girls future reproductive capacity, the risks would seem to be even greater. The vaccine, apparently, is loaded with "additives known to damage female reproduction". What is worse, the drug companies "had never even conducted safety testing on Gardasil in relation to its effects on women's ovaries". According to the Australian report, "Merck had only tested Gardasil's effects on male testes" which as it is given principally to girls is perhaps not very useful!

The vaccine has also been linked to 'Premature menopause'. It is, perhaps, stunning that the conventional medical system, that is supposed to work under the premise "first, do no harm" can give a vaccine that has such a devastating impact on the reproductive future of healthy young girls.

For anyone who can still continue reading about the awful harm caused to healthy young women, the vaccine has also been linked to genital warts.

But the horror story goes on. The vaccine has also been linked with causing cancer, yes, the very disease it is supposed to prevent! Apparently, the vaccine's package insert actually admits that the vaccine has not been tested for 'carcinogenicity'.

So has this vaccine been tested?
The inadequacy of the testing regime for these drugs have come under serious investigation, and although our drug regulators, who are supposed to protect us from dangerous drugs and vaccines, have approved the HPV vaccine, the testing has been found to be seriously flawed. We have already seen that the safety of the vaccine, in terms of causing cancer, and causing harm to the female reproductive system.

This article states the the 'scientific' evidence for the HPV vaccine points to a vaccine that "is ineffective, dangerous , and wrongly promoted as 'anti-cancer". The research reveals that the

          "... scientific and factual evidence that the data behind claims that HPV vaccines prevent cancers and save lives with no risk of serious side effects are “optimistic” and contrary to the evidence and largely are from “significant misinterpretation of available data” which is “presented to the public as factual evidence“. 

The article pulls no punches in its criticism of the poor science that supports this vaccine. But there is evidence that the safety claims made for the HPV vaccines were fraudulent - fraud being something increasingly associated with Big Pharma drugs and vaccines.

One reason for this is the power of the Big Pharma companies, whose "near-total control of governmental health agency decisions" is commented upon in this article, as is the  "utter lack of concern by the decision makers". Those parts of the Conventional Medical Establishment, from politicians, to Governments, to national health service organisations, to regulatory agencies, even to our local GP's, seem completely unable or unwilling to protect patients from harm - such is the power and influence of the drug companies. In this article, 5 scientists speak out about the corruption that has surrounded the both testing and promotion of this vaccine.

Similar criticisms have been accepted by the Supreme Courts in India, a country that has suffered greatly from the HPV vaccine. Massive experimentation took place in two Indian provinces - apparently with little regard being paid to the dangers facing the children who were vaccinated.

So what we are left with is "evidence of immense harm" as described in this Gaia Health article, especially in regard to the safety data for the vaccine, which are so often described on the internet as being 'corrupt' or 'fraudulent'. As long ago as August 2012, Dr. Russell Blaylock exposed "the criminal fraud of Gardasil, HPV vaccinations" in this Natural News article, where the following claims are made:

          "The entire vaccine industry as we know it has been built on a foundation of lies, corruption, and fraud.... retired neurosurgeon and health freedom advocate Dr. Russell Blaylock explains in plain detail how many vaccines, including the ill-famed Gardasil jab for human papillomavirus (HPV), have never been proven to work, and are illegally administered to millions of people without informed consent".


          "Gardasil does not prevent HPV or cervical cancer".


          "Gardasil has injured, killed far more children than ever would have developed cervical cancer without the vaccine".

          "Since full side effects are almost never disclosed, Gardasil and many other vaccines are being illegally administered to millions without informed consent".

And more and more articles about the ineffectiveness and dangers of the HPV vaccine continue to come through on the internet. There are hundreds of them, including the following:

• Most Gardasil safety data discovered to be fraudulent.
• Gardasil provides no benefits.
• Don't give the Gardasil vaccine to your daughter - despite what your doctor says.

If you expect some kind of response from the Big Pharma drug companies, or the conventional medical establishment generally, you will be entirely wrong. Everyone, from governments to doctors, appear to ignore all the evidence. They do not seem to deny them. But they certainly do not challenge them. Instead, they just carry on promoting the vaccine - regardless.

And, of course, the mainstream media remains entirely silent on the matter, preferring to support their advertisers and payments than protect their readers or viewers. I would appear that everyone leaves parents to make a decision without full information, and our young girls to suffer the vaccine without the opportunity of saying "No"!

Japan no longer supports the vaccine.
There is one exception to this. Japan once recommended the vaccine, but after early negative experiences, they have now withdrawn their support.

HPV Vaccines. Japan leads the way.

The Japanese withdraws support for HPB Cervical Cancer vaccine on safety grounds.

HPV Vaccine Exposed As Japan Health Authorities Withdraw Recommendation To Vaccinate.

Cervix vaccine issues trigger health notice.

It is tragic, but true, that the conventional medical establishment will usually continue to push drugs and vaccines right up to the time they become entirely unsupportable, and have to be banned. Unfortunately this always takes many years, during which time many thousands of patients, who are not told the truth, have to suffer the consequences.

Just ask yourself - why is it that the Japanese feel that the HPV vaccine is dangerous, whilst our government, our NHS, our drug regulators, continues to tell us that it is safe?

The result of this vaccine - personal and family tragedy 
Many people will be given this vaccine with suffering. They will be able to withstand the assault with harm. But there are now on the internet hundreds of articles outlining the personal and family tragedy that this vaccine has caused, and continues to cause. It can be likened to a game of Russian Roulette. You may, or you may not be damaged. But dangerous drugs and vaccine should not be regarded as a statistical matter, They represent human and family tragedies which are hard to read about. But here are a selection of these tragedies, about people who lost out in this pernicious game.

• Mother links daughter's mystery illness to vaccine.
• Girl severely damaged by Gardasil recounts horrifying medical ordeal while doctors call her a liar
• Young woman tells of horrific, debilitating health issues she now faces in years following Gardasil vaccination
• HPV Vaccine destroys Australian child's ovaries - manufacturer didn't check!
• Gardasil changed our dreams to nightmares.
• HPV vaccine leaves another teenager chained to a wheelchair for life.
• Girl, 16, left paralysed in 3 limbs, after having the HPV vaccine.

The result of this vaccine - court judgements

The other result of the HPV vaccine is an increasing amount of litigation now appearing in the courts. There are two cases, of note

• US vaccine court pays $6 million to Gardasil victims, most claims not yet settled.
• Supreme Court Suit Filed over HPV Vaccine Tragedy in India.

Yet many families are unable to bring such action to court. It is prohibitively costly. And in many countries Big Pharma companies have been given legal immunity to these claims. Moreover, Big Pharma appear to take these court cases, and the fines imposed, as something akin to a business expense rather than something to respond to on behalf of the health and safety of patients! $6 million dollars may be a lot of money for most of us. But for Big Pharma it is small change compared to the profitability of selling dangerous drugs and vaccines.

Will this evidence stop the ConMed Establishment pushing the vaccines?
So will all the evidence against HPV vaccines bring about any government action? Will it lead to drug regulators taking action on behalf of patients? Will the conventional medical establishment, including our compliant doctors, and are unconcerned media, take action? From this evidence, it does not appear so.

Governments do not appear to have to have lost their enthusiam for pushing dangerous drugs and vaccines (and of course the UK government continues its programme of vaccination).

• US government spending $500k to push HPV vaccine that keeps killing young women.

And there appears to be some enthusiasm within the ConMed Establishment to give the vaccine to younger children, regardless of any evidence.

• The Coming Push to Give HPV Vaccines to Infants.

And the prospect of doubling the market for the HPV vaccine, by extending the market to boys, appears to be just too tempting for BigPharma.

• Australian boys become first male guinea pigs in global Gardasil genocide.

There is clearly more profit to be reaped in promoting this vaccine - and so a lot more human suffering is in prospect!

So if you, or your daughter or grand-daughter are offered this vaccine, just say "No"! You will certainly not be alone!

http://www.wddty.com/parents-refuse-gardasil-hpv-vaccine-for-their-teenage-daughters.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/036108_HPV_vaccines_Gardasil_backlash.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/039634_HPV_vaccines_resistance_victory.html

The Failure of Conventional Medicine. HPV Vaccination, Gardasil and Cervarix.

Big Pharma vaccines are dangerous. My last blog in the series focused on articles covering many types of vaccines. This one focuses on just one: the HPV vaccines (Gardasil and Cervarix); those given to pubescent girls, allegedly to 'prevent cervical cancer'. 

I am not sure whether these vaccines are just more dangerous that others, or if the damage they cause is more noticeable or apparent in young people rather than with babies and young children. But the evidence against them is now quite immense - although, as usual, the evidence does not get through the censorship exercise in the mainstream media!

There has always been concern about what the evidence, and the quality of evidence, that supports giving this vaccine. This article goes over the paucity of the evidence, both for its efficacy (does it, or will it, do what it says it will do); and is it safe.

So what damage has the HPV/Gardasil/Cervarix vaccines caused?

This articles states that 'at least' 12 schoolgirls in New York have been damaged by a 'mystery illnesses'. The mystery illness is Tourette's Syndrome. And, of course, only to those who don't wish to acknowledge the most likely cause of this condition are really mystified!

This important article outlines the damage done to 213 women who have suffered permanent disability after having the vaccine. The article states that the vaccine is known to cause paralysis, and MS-type symptoms, as well as seizures, blindness, and many other conditions. It goes into some of the detail about the problems being caused by the vaccines, and includes individual videos of young girls whose lives have been devastated by it. It also asks, pertinently, whether some deaths have caused by the vaccine, but explained away as 'a coincidence'.

This VacTruth article does suggest that this vaccine is 'killing us softly'. It states that there is no HPV crisis, that HPV does not lead to cancer, that the vaccine does not prevent cancer - and much else.

Rarely does the mainstream media bother to report the dangers of these vaccines. With perhaps this exception, the tragic story of a 13 year old girl put into a 'waking coma' after receiving the vaccine; the article appeared in the Sun; and here in the mirror. But isolated appearances such as this give the unfortunate impression that these are 'isolated' incidents, and not as common as they are.

The fact is that these vaccines can destroy the lives of young people, and cause devastation within families, when healthy young people are involved in vaccine-induced tragedy. These mums have expressed their views about their damaged children - after a bland (but typical) statement was issued about the 'excellent safety record' of Gardasil.

Yet even Medical Journals, so often quiet in matters concerned the the dangers of drugs and vaccines, are now raising questions about HPV vaccines. This article goes into the questions being asked about the adequacy of testing prior to the vaccines being used, and the ethics behind the testing. However, there appears to be no suggestion that their licenses should be withdrawn!

This article tells the same story - that HPV vaccines are unproven, ineffective, and lack evidence. The article states that:

the latest Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. VAERS statistics clearly show that HPV Vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, have been associated with 22, 619 adverse reactions; 8,926 of those reports requiring emergency hospitalization; and 4,616 cases where the victim did not recover. Death reports stand at 102.


The first State in the USA to use the Gardasil vaccine is now beginning to withdraw it. But this is the exception. Throughout the world, governments and politicians seem to positively, and sometimes aggressively, sanctioning this vaccine. This article also includes data about the vaccines:

VAERS data show that Gardasil has been associated with 24,184 adverse effects since its debut in June of 2006, including seizures, anaphylaxis, paralysis, transverse myelitis, Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome (uncontrollable movement of the eyes back and forth and jerking movements of the extremities), brachial neuritis, loss of vision, postural tachycardia syndrome, facial palsy, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, chronic fatigue syndrome, blindness, pancreatitis, speech problems, short term memory loss, miscarriage, multiple sclerosis, autoimmune disorders, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, abnormal Pap smears and even cervical cancer.[24][25][26] 


Yes, you read that correctly – VAERS reports 41 cases of cervical cancer following vaccination with Gardasil!

With all this vaccine-induced mayhem, Sanevax is now calling for approval to be withdrawn - because of the lack of post-licensing monitoring. In other words, there has not been adequate oversight into wht is happening to the young people who receive this vaccine. And in another letter, Sanevax is calling for educators to monitor the dangers of this vaccine - perhaps because, in many (too many) cases, schools and teachers are being used by health authorities to promote it, and even to enforce it.

And now, in some parts of the world, the drug companies are trying to persuade us that boys, and well as girls, need this vaccine! I wonder, is this to prevent boys getting cervical cancer? Or is it more to do with boasting Big Pharma profits? The 'debate' can also be found in this Dr Mercola article.

So will the boys fare any better than the girls? It does not appear that they will, with these 4 deaths already being reported. See here also for more information on this.

The silence of the ConMed Establishment, and the mainstream media about the dangers of vaccines, displays the usual lack of honesty and openness regarding drug and vaccine dangers, and health matters generally. This means that most people do not know, or understand what they are agreeing to, when they are vaccinated, or they agree to their children being vaccinated. The article emphasises this, and gives another example of a young girl, damaged by the HPV vaccine.

But at least one brave doctor, in Austria, has spoken out. The message is the same though. The vaccine is dangerous, and completely useless in preventing cancer. And a group of doctors in France have also stated that the vaccine should be de-listed and suspended because of the dangers.

So how do we protect our young girls from this dangerous vaccine? This article discusses the problem, suggesting that we tell them, quite simply, that the vaccine is neither necessary or effective!

And there are signs that the Big Pharma companies, who see vaccines as a way of earning vast profits, are at last being taken to task. Litigation in the USA is already underway.

And even some politicians are finding the issues difficult; not least when their campaign funds are made up of Big Pharma donations.

We need to protect our children from vaccines, and the HPV vaccine in particular. Recently, the UK government decided to give Gardasil rather than Cervarix. I am not entirely sure why this decision was taken. If there were 'outcome problems' with Cervarix, then a move to Gardasil (on which there is much more evidence of harm) seems to be a triumph of hope over experience!

Neither vaccine is safe. And both should be avoided.

Big Pharma targeting teenagers with their dangerous HPVGardisil vaccine

The Health Sciences Institute is new to me, but I now receive their regular newsletter. For those of you who would like to subscribe, write to them at dailyhealth@agorapub.co.uk


This is one of their newsletters, copied here in full....


"This is a warning for all parents and grandparents: Drug giant Merck wants to inject every one of your young girls and boys with Gardasil (Cervarix in the UK), the controversial human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. 

It's controversial, of course, because it's been shown to prevent a few types of human HPV, but it certainly is not a "cervical cancer vaccine," as it's sometimes touted.

In addition, the total reported adverse side effects (including deaths) linked to the vaccine are staggering.

But all those drawbacks don't bother the mainstream media. Not a bit! It's like major media outlets are playing whack- a-mole — always on a worldwide lookout for the slightest shred of good news about these HPV vaccines to pop up, and then...WHACK! they hit us over the head with it.

Spanning the globe 

Starting down under...

In a new Australian study, researchers found that Gardasil use helped reduce the number of cervix abnormalities in young girls by "as much as 50 per cent."

That sounds pretty impressive. But buried in a lower paragraph is the laughably unimpressive truth: Among vaccinated girls, the rate of high-grade cervical abnormalities was 0.42 per cent. Among unvaccinated girls: 0.8 per cent.

The difference was just a few tenths of a single percentage point! And yet when you twist the maths, it comes out like a great headline and a big win for these vaccines.

In another recent study, Austrian researchers tested more than 100 men for HPV infection and found that about 10 per cent had high-risk HPV, but none showed clinical symptoms of infection.

CNN, a global news channel based in the US — one of the media's most generous Gardasil enablers — reported on the research, and offered this quote from the vice chair of the urology department at the University of Kansas: "Not only girls, but boys should be vaccinated because of these findings."

Wow — that's a huge jump to THAT conclusion! The study didn't involve vaccinations in any form. And yet based on the results of his very small study, he's ready to vaccinate every boy.

Of course, CNN's report doesn't let out a peep about the avalanche of daunting side effects linked to these vaccines that were reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. The same was true earlier this year when CNN covered a Gardasil study that appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine.

In that study — partly designed and funded by Merck — results showed that Gardasil was about 60 per cent effective in preventing HPV genital warts in young men.

Now, you expect trials like this to have the drug company's fingerprints all over it. But CNN didn't mention anything about the study authors and their significant Merck affiliations:

* Seven authors were employees of Merck and owned Merck stock or stock options * Five authors received Merck grant support * Five authors received speaking fees or fees for board membership from Merck * Six authors received travel reimbursement from Merck * One author had "an approved, filed, or pending patent" related to subject matter discussed in the NEJM article

Well it's just one big happy Merck family, cranking out a study with (surprise!) wonderful results for the Merck product.

"HPV vaccine effective in men" was the no-grey-areas CNN headline.

Now for the reality check

About 2,000 boys and young men received a Gardasil vaccine, and about 2,000 did not. Three years later, 36 in the Gardasil group had external genital lesions, and 89 had the same in the placebo group.

That's a difference of only 53 cases, which is pretty insubstantial given the total number of subjects and the fact that we have no way of comparing the levels of sexual activity of the two groups.

Meanwhile, at some point, 36 men must have said something like, "Wait, I got the vaccine and STILL got genital warts? What's up with that?"

Good question, Merck. What's up with that?

Mothers and fathers, grandfathers and grandmothers – don't be fooled by the media's ridiculous whack-a-mole game. This vaccine is in no way worth the risk for your young boys and girls.

Gardasil (and Cervarix) - the most dangerous vaccine ever?

To gain this title, a vaccine has to be fairly destructive; but this is what it has been called in this Natural News article, which you should read to be aware of the dangerous of this vaccination.
http://www.naturalnews.com/031098_Gardasil_risks.html

          In the face of increasing reports of adverse events and death rates that are 400% higher than other vaccines, Merck continues to maintain that its controversial Gardasil vaccine is safe and continues to push for wider use. One group Merck would especially like to gain approval for is older women (currently, the vaccine is not approved for women over 27 years old). Despite Merck's claims to the contrary, studies have actually shown that Gardasil and its sister vaccine Cervarix (from GlaxoSmithKline) provide no protection for women already exposed to the HPV virus and in fact present highly elevated risks for already exposed women as well as for expectant mothers.

It is not long ago that all our young girls were 'offered' this vaccine. Parents were told it was safe. My grand-daughter did not have the vaccination, and was told off by her teacher! We know that the drug companies will continue to defend their drugs and vaccines, until the evidence is overwhelming, and they are forced to act. But why does the government, the Department of Health, the NHS, and our GPs fail to tell us? Why do our mainstream media say nothing about this?


One state in the USA is now acting, well, almost!
http://www.naturalnews.com/031124_HPV_vaccines_Virginia.html

Let's hope the financial resources of the drug companies are not instrumental in changing their mind!

The Truth about the Gardasil (and Cervarix) vaccine

For anyone who wants to know the truth about Conventional Medicine, it is no use listening to the government, the NHS, or even your own doctor. It is certainly no use relying on the mainstream media. People damaged by pharmaceutical drugs often have to set up their own support groups, and their own websites.

Gardasil is the HPV vaccine, foisted on young girls over the last two years to 'fight' cervical cancer. But thousands of girls are now experiencing severe adverse reactions, and some have died - about 71 according to the group, ''The Truth about Gardasil' (https://kkfi.org/program-episodes/the-truth-about-gardasil/}

This website outlines some of the reactions these girls have suffered, including seizures, strokes, dizziness, fatigue, weakness, headaches, stomach pains, muscle pain and weakness, joint pain, auto-immune problems, chest pains, hair loss, appetite loss, personality changes, insomnia, hand/leg tremors, arm/leg weakness, shortness of breath, heart problems, paralysis, itching, rashes, swelling, aching muscles, menstrual cycle changes, fainting, swollen lymph nodes, night sweats, nausea, temporary vision/hearing loss just to name some of them!

The website says that there is no known treatment to help these girls. They are wrong in this, of course, they should be seeking out local homeopaths to see if this treatment is able to help them; but essentially they are talking here about the response of ConMed, and ConMed practitioners. They say this:

" The doctors, if they even admit the connection, have no idea how to help them. So they spend their days going from appointment to appointment, from specialist to specialist trying to find someone to help them. Many of these families have started looking for help outside of mainstream medicine, which in some cases, may bring minor relief. However, most insurance plans do not cover this type of treatment, and as a result, this route is out of reach for many girls".

And before my denialist readers  cry 'foul', girls have not been given Gardisil in the UK, the website also covers those who have used Cervirix too.


This is yet another Conventional Medical disaster.

MS and the Gardisil vaccine now linked

Horrendous, I know, but the Gardisil vaccine is now being linked to MS in Australia.

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,26476824-5003426,00.html.

Of course we have had the Cervarix vaccine in the UK, but early reports showed that this was having enormous adverse reactions. See, for instance,

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1160516/Paralysis-epilepsy-blurred-vision-1-300-girls-reaction-cervical-cancer-vaccine.html