Covid-19. How do we sort "information" from "misinformation" from Government Propaganda from vested Pharmaceutical interests? Or is 'Big Brother' in control?

There is a complexity of information coming through, mainly on the internet, about the origins of the Covid-19 virus, the seriousness of the pandemic, and the safety and effectiveness of the new Covid-19 vaccines. I have given links to some of the more recent information I have seen below - just an example of the questions that are being raised. 

But first, I want to consider the reason for doing so, and particularly to ask the questions we all need to ask about each one of these links, and why they are being ignored, or dismissed as 'disinformation by government, the medical establishment, and the mainstream media (MSM).

By sharing these links, I suspect I will be accused of peddling "misinformation" and perhaps even censored now by social media.

My general concerned about this situation are as follow:.

• Do all these articles constitute "misinformation", or "fake news"? Are they to be routinely dismissed in this cavalier way, with examination or investigation?
• Why is the official information, provided by government, the medical establishment, the MSM, and now Social Media, so monotonously identical?
• How can the general public distinguish between what is "real information" and what is "misinformation"? Can they rely on what the government, the medical hierarchy, and the MSM tell us? Is it telling us the whole truth?
  
• Indeed, why does government, the medical establishment, and the MSM routinely dismiss any article that is even critical of their message?
• Why is the general public not being informed about the reasons WHY these, and similar articles, are considered to be "disinformation"?
• Why does the MSM not investigate such articles in order to discover whether they are true, and if false, tell us about the reasons they have arrived at this decision?
• Why does the MSM, who like to describe themselves as 'the free press', never investigate or report to us any information that is contrary to the message of government, and the conventional medical establishment?
• Does the MSM believe that the only information the public is allowed to have is the information that government, and the conventional medical establishment, wants us to know? If so, is this the proper role of a 'free press' within a democratic society.
• Why are people who are 'vaccine hesitant' dismissed out of hand, and abused as being over-influenced by 'fake news' and 'misinformation', and never given a voice.

Does it not all sound a little like "BIG BROTHER"?

As someone who has always questioned what I am being told, particularly when it is the message of  powerful governments and big, influential corporations, I wonder why the information in these articles are either being ignored, or never mentioned, or if mentioned just dismissed "disinformation" without any reasons being given. 

In the past I have always noted that such a strategy has more to do with the propaganda of powerful and influential vested interests, commercial and political groups who don't want to be questioned, and have sufficient control to avoid questioning. It is a strategy that has more to do with partial propaganda, or cover-up than it is good government, or good health care provision, or good journalism. So let's have a look at just a few of the articles that are being ignored, and dismissed as 'misinformation'.

Investigation links Fauci to controversial experiments that may have led to Pandemic

• Has this investigation been investigated? Did it happen or is it misinformation? Why does the MSM not discuss it's findings, notably that the origins of the virus came from a USA funded Chinese laboratory? Has anyone questioned Fauci about the allegation, has he been asked to respond?
  

Why Covid-19 vaccine testing is a farce

• Is it true that the control group in vaccine tests were given another vaccine rather than a placebo? Can this allegation be confirmed? Why has there been no investigation? Why has the MSM debated the criticism of vaccine testing, why has this been ignored, why have we not been told? Is it really misinformation?
  

UK (Government) Data show 402 reports of deaths following Covid-19 vaccines

• Does this data exist? If so why has government not informed us? Why has the medical establishment not responded, what is their view about what happened? Why has the MSM not investigated or told us about this data? Is the failure to do so the result of it being 'misinformation', or is it a medical cover-up?
  

Numbers of injuries reported to CDC after Covid-19 vaccines climbs by nearly 4,000 in one week.

• Is this true? This is an official USA government body so surely it can be verified? Yet it has not been mentioned by any official governmental, medical or MSM channel. Why is this? If it is true can the vaccines be described as "safe"? Are patient outcomes not a matter of public concern?
  

Tanzanian government skeptical about safety of Covid-19 vaccines

• Is it sceptical? What is the basis of the scepticism? Why are the reasons for scepticism dismissed as 'misinformation' rather than forming a basis for discussion about vaccine safety?
  

Whistleblower. 25% of residents in German nursing home died after Pfizer vaccine.

• Is this true? Can the story be corroborated or not? Why has the news, true or false, not been made public? Why has there been no official mention of this, or even a denial? Is it sensible that we just believe it is 'disinformation'? Are older people in residential and nursing homes safe? Do we need to know what is happening?
  

Israeli Health Ministry. Pfizer vaccine killed "about 40 times more elderly than the disease would have killed"

• Is this true? Can the information be verified? Why has there been no investigation by MSM? Why have they not mentioned this claim? Has this information just been dismissed as disinformation? Is this not something the general public should be told about?
  

Surgeon dies weeks after Covid-19 vaccination of multi-organ system failure

• This should be easy enough to substantiate? Did the surgeon die? Was the vaccine the cause of his  multi-organ failure? Why is this not reported by the MSM?
  

 Man dies 25 minutes after getting Covid-19 vaccine in New York?

• Can this be substantiated? Did the man die? Was the vaccine the cause of his death? Why is this not reported by the MSM?
  

Elderly man dies shortly after receiving Covid-19 vaccine....

• Is this correct? Did the man die? Was the vaccine the cause of his death? Why was it not reported by the MSM?
  

Why is death after Covid-19 vaccination always assumed to be coincidental?

• Is it? I have seen several deaths discounted by doctors as being 'coincidental' to the vaccination. Is it appropriate for MSM not to question the medical authorities about the link? Is it not important to investigate whether people are dying after taking the vaccine? Why are deaths not being reported? Is there a cover-up going on that the public needs to know about?
  

Stats on Covid-19 vaccine injury and death don't add up

• Why is this? Why are all the concerns about numbers not being examined and discussed? Why is government and medical information never questioned by MSM, but routinely accepted without any questioning?
  

Coronavirus Fact Check. Why are 'new cases' plummeting?

• Are 'new cases' plummeting? And is the reason given in this article correct? Does the claim need to be examined and discussed? Or is it disinformation? And why is the general public not being told, one way or another?

Twitter to permanently ban users who spread Covid-19 misinformation

• So which of these internet articles, if  'spread' on this blog, will result in followers of Twitter, and other social media platforms, being banned? Who makes the decision about what is, and what is not misinformation? Why is social media meekly following government, the conventional medical establishment, and the MSM, in not allowing discussion of these issues?

So before I get de-platformed by social media for referring to these articles, or further abused by the MSM for not automatically accepted what I am being told, perhaps they would have the professional integrity to answer these questions. It is undemocratic not to do so. It is against what we are supposed to believe about personal liberty, individual freedom, free speech and the freedom of information. This is not just about these particular articles, but the many other reports that question, or are critical of how we are being informed about the virus, the pandemic, and the way governments are dealing with it, and the unwillingness of the MSM to respond to it fairly and equitably.

Vaccine Propaganda. The Censorship of Debate. Yet there is still 'low trust' in vaccination! How lies lead to intransigence and fixed positions

There are key messages about vaccines and vaccination that we all need to know. Indeed, the conventional medical establishment absolutely insists that we should know and understand these messages. What are these message?

• Vaccines are entirely safe.
• There is 'overwhelming scientific evidence' that vaccines are the best defence against dangerous and deadly infections. 
• The vaccines work, and they are overcoming disease. 
• They are protecting billions of people around the world.
• And regular, increasingly frantic warnings are given about the return of 'deadly' diseases like measles around the unvaccinated world.

So the conventional medical establishment insist that we must all get vaccinated. And the mainstream media not only supports this position, it actively censors any message, or messenger, that runs contrary to it.

Yet despite this concerted efforted it would seem that there is still a low level of trust in vaccination!

So why is it that everyone is still not convinced? It is not the cost of vaccines, usually heavily subsidised in one way or another throughout the world.

The Wellcome Trust has conducted the biggest global study into attitudes about immunisation, involving more that 140,000 people from over 140 countries. It suggests that confidence in vaccines is "extremely low" in some regions, that the number of people who said they had little confidence in vaccination was, on average, around 20% - and in many places much higher.

• As far as safety is concerned, 7% said they did not think vaccines were safe, and a further 14% were uncertain.
• As far as effectiveness is concerned 5% did not think they were effective, and another 12% were uncertain.

This level of confidence is considered to be such a problem the World Health Organisation has called 'vaccine hesitancy' one of the top 10 threats to global health!

This is quite an amazing situation, but not for the reasons doctors and the media are telling us. The conventional medical establishment states its position, unequivocally, repeatedly, and this position is never openly questioned. The mainstream media supports this position - unreservedly and unquestioningly. Any views to the contrary are rigorously censored. Anyone who disagrees with the 'official' view remains unheard, lambasted, and without any right of reply. The anti-vaxxers are just not listening to the 'science' of vaccines, at best 'complacent' about the seriousness of the infections, and the important protection that vaccines offer. And at worst anti-vaxxers are peddling unscientific and uncorroberated misinformation on the internet.

So the question is - where does the 20% get this 'misinformation', why do they believe it, and why are they resistant to the view of the medical establishment?

• Their information is not coming from their doctors. 
• It is not coming from the mainstream media. 
• And serious efforts are now being made to censor the anti-vaccine information on the the internet.

Yet despite this concerted and co-ordinated propaganda 20% of the population are no convinced.

The problem is, of course, that some people do actively question this conventional medical wisdom. Most of them, according to the Wellcome Foundation survey, come from "higher-income regions". Is this because people from these regions are more questioning people, less subject to establishment pressure? The following reasons are certainly important.

• Many people have experience vaccine damage directly, and their family, friends and colleagues will have become aware of vaccine damaged individuals. 
• Some patients do actually insist on reading the Patient Information Leaflets (PILS) that come with each vaccine, and these list at least some of the dangers of vaccines.
• Other people have taken the trouble to examine official summaries of adverse vaccine reactions on the internet.
• An increasing number of people are aware of vaccine injury compensation schemes, not least in the USA and Britain, that regularly pay out large sums to vaccine damaged patients.

None of this information fits snuggly with the official "vaccines are safe" view. When someone has seen the evidence (mostly from conventional medical literature itself) about vaccine harm they are aware that doctors are not telling them the truth, that they are being intentionally mislead. People are not being told the truth. The conventional medical establishment is, in fact, lying to us.

So vaccine hesitancy is not going to go away, it is on the increase. And it is not just that resistance is harden, it is causing an increasingly intractable situation, on both sides of the argument.

1. Once people know they are being told lies by the conventional medical establishment they will not find it easy to believe anything they are told in future. They will not trust the source that has told lies about that, or any other subject.
2. The conventional medical establishment, which has created the lie, cannot afford to admit that it has been lying. It will have to defend the lie, their credibility will depend upon it.

The mainstream media, too, must also be feeling the threat to their credibility.

• Why has journalism been so vacillating and quiescent? 
• Why has it chosen to side with the pharmaceutical companies?
• Why has it not been prepared to do its job - to question and investigate?
• Why has the so-called 'free press' failed to tell its readers, viewers and listeners the truth? 
• Why has it censored the case against vaccines?

So in the coming months and years the media too will have increasing difficulty defending what it is now doing - endorsing the lies of conventional medicine - and failing to engage in the real health debate that is going on out here.