Don't get injured with prescribed drugs. You will receive no support.

Blogger has 'deleted' this post because they said it did not conform to their censorship rules - which mean that it is too critical of the Pharmaceutical Medical Establishment! It is an important subject. Many people take drugs and are harmed but they find it difficult/impossible to get any assistance from the medical profession, and are too often left to suffer. 

But I am pleased to tell you that you can now read it - courtesy of my new website on Substack. This is the URL, click on it, and read without the need of wondering whether it has been censored.

https://safemedicine.substack.com/p/do-not-get-injured-with-prescribed.

All my other blogs on blogger, all 15 years of them, have now been copied over to the new website - and I am busy trying to negotiate how to use the new site.

I will continue using this blog, but I would be grateful if you could follow me on Substack; there is a button at the bottom of the article in which to do so. 

Thanks for all your support on this platform.

Blogger: A Censorship Organisation?

I regret to say that the website that hosts this blog, "Blogger" is, or has become, a censorship organisation. I say this regretfully as I have been posting on this blog since 2018. But it seems increasingly likely that this blog will be soon be banned entirely - this has already been threatened by "Blogger".

(So if you follow me, or would like to do so, can you now do so on this link:  https://safemedicine.substack.com

The recent facts about Blogger's censorship activity against this blog are as follows:

On 31 May 2024 my blog "The Contaminated Blood Scandal and Covid-19 vaccines. The only difference is 50 years!" was deleted.

On 15th January my blog "Covid-19 Vaccines: have two vaccines already been banned? And are we allowed to know" was deleted.

On 5th May 2025 three of my blogs, (i) "The Largesse of the Pharmaceutical Industry: Why did doctors recommend that we take Covid-19 vaccines", (ii) "Measles Vaccine Campaign targets 'Unprotected Millions'", and (iii) "Don't get injured with prescribed drugs: you will be alone with little support" were all deleted.

I asked for all these decisions to be reconsidered. One of the deleted posts ("Don't get injured.....") was indeed reconsidered and reinstated on 9th May 2025.

However, quite amazingly, on 13th May 2025 "Don't get injured....." was again deleted! 

Deleted! Reviewed! Deleted again!?!

What sort of 'review' or 'reconsideration' was this? And on what basis have these blogs been deemed to have "violated' Blogger's "misleading content" policy in the first place? 

I am more sad than angry about this as I suspect the problem did not involve humans, but some AI computer programme! Perhaps a programme allied to, and written by people with a vested interest in pharmaceutical medicine.

My regular readers will be aware that I do not 'mislead'. If I make a statement, however challenging, it is based on evidence, my blogs always refer to that evidence, and always seeks to provide the reader with reference to that evidence.

So I will continue to use "Blogger" to post my blogs on medicine, until such time as the entire site is taken down. We all have to realise that censorship is happening regularly around the entire world. Big Corporations (not least Big Pharma) use their supporters to 'report' critical articles, and might damage their vested interests. And the media, clearly including Blogger, are pressurised into taking action. 

Rich and powerful vested interests have always controlled the media agenda in this way. So it is difficult to write about the patients harmed by the contaminated blood scandal, and similarities now with patients harmed by Covid-19 vaccines. It is difficult to point out that two Covid-19 vaccines have been withdrawn, effectively banned, because of patient harm. It is difficult to point out that there is evidence that doctors are paid to prescribe pharmaceutical drugs. It is difficult to point out that measles is now a mild disease, and to question whether vaccines are necessary. It is difficult to point out that patients who have been harmed by drugs/vaccines have an almost impossible tiask to convince the medical establishment that this is so, and to get compensation.

Perhaps all this information is "misleading", as Blogger has told me. If so the most appropriate response, within a democracy, is to counter the information with arguments and facts. In this way we are all assisted in making an informed choice - which is an important element in health freedom. It is certainly not democratic to remove/censor the information.

So this blog is prior notification to my regular readers that there is a problem - I suspect that unless I stop being critical of the pharmaceutical medical establishment this entire blog will soon be taken down.

There are clearly things we are not supposed to know about; and the medical establishment has enough influence and power to stop us hearing about them!

Medical Breakthroughs (when the principles of homeopathy are followed)

Over the recent holiday weekend, the British mainstream media featured a strange story of a man who had injected himself with snake venom, and that his body was now "almost immune from it", and that "he was donating his blood to science".

The story was presented with incredulity; but the homeopathic community would not have thought it at all unusual! And his blood would not have been donated to science!

A similar story was featured by the BBC earlier that week: a man whose peanut allergy nearly killed him; but now he eats them every day for breakfast.

        "But then his mum heard about a clinical trial at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London that would change her son's life. It would test whether adults like Chris with serious peanut allergies could be desensitised by training their bodies to tolerate the very thing that could kill it, calming down the immune system when it would usually over-react".

Yet this 'new' treatment for nut allergy is not a 'new' treatment offered by conventional (drug-based) medicine. I wrote about this same 'breakthrough' in 2014 in this blog, again based on more 'incredulous' BBC reporting.

I wrote another blog, on a similar subject, in 2015 when conventional medicine announced (through the mainstream media) that it had found a 'new' treatment - this time for dust mite allergy.

In the same year, I wrote this blog about a 'new' conventional medical treatment for superbugs, notably C-Difficile.

And yet again, in 2016, I wrote this blog about a 'new' treatment for multiple sclerosis.

So what do all these 'conventional medical treatments have in common? As I said in those earlier blogs, what conventional medicine is doing is using the primary medical principle of homeopathy.

Homeopathy is based on the ancient principle of "Like Curing Like", that small, dilute amounts of a substance that is causing illness and disease can cure that same illness and disease. It was a principle used successfully in ancient Greece, and by many people throughout the ancient and medieval world. Homeopathy uses snake venoms as remedies - but not in doses that might be harmful or lethal to the patient. The contribution of homeopathy is that the dilution of substances strengthens, rather than weakens, the medical effect of the substance used. It cures, but does so safely.

Conventional, pharmaceutical medicine is based on drugs that kill (eg., pain killers), block (eg., beta blockers), inhibit (eg., ACE inhibitors), suppress (eg., appetite suppressants, immunosuppressants), and oppose (eg., antagonist drugs. The are all 'anti-...' drugs), anti- something that is happening to the body of a sick patient. This adversarial approach to the body does not work; it has never worked; and will never work. It is this approach to medicine that causes side effects (at best), adverse reactions (at least), and epidemic levels of chronic disease and death. It is why pharmaceutical medicine is failing - so badly.

The Conventional Medical Establishment has spent the last 30 years attacking Homeopathy: they say it does not work; it cannot work; it is placebo; it is quack medicine, and the like. It is denied to patients on the British NHS. It is denied to patients around the world in which drug companies have control of state-supported medicine.

Yet when conventional medicine stumbles on a treatment that is based on the principle of homeopathy, 'like curing like', it has the audacity to crow about it, to describe it as a 'breakthrough', and without acknowledging the source and inspiration of the 'new' treatment.

This is a dishonest approach to medicine; but then why should anyone (given the history of pharmaceutical medicine, outlined here) expect honesty from the conventional medical profession. To do so would surely be a triumph of hope over experience!