Thursday, 15 January 2026

'How can we know if pharmaceutical drugs being prescribed today are harming us?'

For all my regular readers on this platform I need to inform you that once again "Blogger" has seen fit to delete my post,"How can we know if the pharmaceutical drugs being prescribed today are harming us?' 

The Blogger platform is part of Google, which is a censorship organisation that does not allow us to write anything too critical about the Pharmaceutical Medical Establishment.

However, the article on Blogger was first published on my 'Safe Medicine' Substack platform, and can be read there, in full, by clicking on this link. If you want to follow my writing can I suggest that you 'follow' me on Sustack instead of Blogger.

Blogger says that the article "was flagged for review" and they "determined that it violates our guidelines". Why was it deleted? They said:

        "Your content has been evaluated according to our Misleading content policy."

I do not write 'misleading' material. My only interest in writing these articles is to assist people to think more clearly about what is "safe", and what is not "safe" medicine. The content of the deleted article can be simply outlined. 

  • All pharmaceutical drugs are tested before they are given to patients, and usually described as "safe and effective". However, as drugs are consumed by patients more evidence of patient harm is discovered, and has to be added to the information listed about the drug. I know of no pharmaceutical drug that has not followed this pattern. As a result many drugs have been withdrawn or banned because of this because they were deemed "unsafe". Therefore we can assume that all currently prescribed drugs will follow the same pattern, that is, we are prescribed drugs that are not as "safe and effective" as we have been led to believe.

There is nothing 'misleading' about making this argument, although the pharmaceutical medical establishment might prefer us not to understand this. If so there is a counter-argument to be made - but clearly conventional medicine prefer not to enter into such a debate. 

Perhaps they are not too confident about winning it!