Search This Blog

Tuesday, 13 January 2015

Dementia and Alzheimers. Are they caused by conventional pharmaceutical drugs?

Alzheimer’s disease is the commonest of over 100 forms of dementia, a brain disorder that seriously and progressively restricts the ability to carry out normal daily functions and activities. Ultimately, dementia destroys every faculty that makes the person human. It affects the parts of the brain that control thought, memory, and language. Dementia progressively involves mental agility, thinking speed, memory loss, language, understanding, and judgement. It affects the personality, with increasing apathy, disinterest in friends and surroundings, inability to control emotions. Ultimately, they lose control of their ability to control their own lives and functioning.

What is the cause of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia?

NHS Choices describes the causes of dementia as follows:

“Dementia is caused by gradual changes and damage in the brain. The most common causes of dementia include diseases in which the brain cells degenerate and die more quickly than they would as part of the normal ageing process. The changes usually happen because of a build-up of abnormal proteins in the brain. This damage leads to a decline in a person's mental and, sometimes, physical abilities.”

As so often, this is a physical description of what happens to the brain, not what has happened to have caused these changes to the brain. Clearly any person who develops dementia has suffered some kind of damage to the brain, the question is, what has caused the brain to lose its ability to operate normally.

Often, the main excuse for the rapid rise of dementia in recent decades has been that ‘people are living longer’, and that dementia is ‘a normal part of ageing’. There are three reasons to question whether this is an adequate or viable explanation.

  • First, many people live to advanced old age without suffering any noticeable of dementia. 
  • Second, many people are now contracting dementia in their 30’s and 40’s, what the conventional medical establishment calls ‘early onset dementia’.
  • Third, the epidemic rise of dementia, in all its many forms, far outstrips any rise in ageing demographic trends.
History and facts about Alzheimer’s disease and dementia

It is just over 100 years ago that neurologist, Alois Alzheimer first described this disease. His patient was a woman who developed dementia in her 50s and died in 1906. Now Alzheimer's disease is the most common form of dementia, and it is estimated that 24 million people around the world suffer it. By 2040 it has been projected  by Alzheimer’s Disease International, that there will be some 81 million sufferers throughout the world, with much of the incidence being in the 'developed' world, that is, that part of the world that consumes most conventional medical drugs.

The incidence of Alzheimer’s, and dementia generally, has increased rapidly, particularly over the last 50 to 60 years.  A report published in 2006 by the Alzheimer's Disease International (ADI), mentioned in the Lancet (17 December 2005), calculated that there was a new case of dementia every seven seconds, and predicted that, worldwide, dementia cases are expected to double every 20 years. They estimated that over 24 million people are living with dementia, and 4.6 million new cases are diagnosed each year. There are 4.8 million in Western Europe and 3.4 million in North America. The ADI chairman is reported as calling the situation "a ticking time bomb”.

The Alzheimer's Society published a major study on the social and economic impact of dementia in the UK in February 2007, and again in November 2014. Both were undertaken by King's College London, and the London School of Economics. They provided the most detailed information about the prevalence and impact of dementia in the UK. These are some of the Dementia UK 2014 findings (the report can be downloaded from here).
  • One in every 79 (1.3%) of the entire UK population, and 1 in every 14 of the population aged 65 years and over has dementia. The majority of these are women,
  • At the current estimated rate of prevalence, there will be 850,000 people with dementia in the UK in 2015. (In 2007 the estimate was 700,000).
  • The total number of people with dementia in the UK is forecast to increase to over 1 million by 2025 and over 2 million by 2051. 
  • There are now 42,325 people with early-onset dementia (onset before the age of 65 years) and 773,502 people with late-onset dementia (onset after the age of 65 years) in the UK. (In 2007 the figure given was 15,000 for early onset).
  • In total, 311,730 people with dementia in the UK are living in care homes, of whom 180,500 are living in residential care and 131,230 in nursing homes. 
  • As in 2007, nearly two-thirds (62%) of all people with dementia in the UK, 505,813 in total, have Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), known to be the most common form of dementia. 
  • For those with dementia aged over 60 years, an estimated 55% have mild dementia, 32% have moderate dementia and 12% have severe dementia.
  • Among people with late-onset dementia, 311,730 (38.7%) are living in care homes (either residential care or nursing homes) and 493,639 (61.3%) are living in the community. 
  • The total cost of dementia to society in the UK is £26.3 billion, with an average cost of £32,250 per person. (The total cost figure in 2007 was £17 billion).
  • Family it was noted that carers bear the main cost, and provide the most care for people with dementia.

Pharmaceutical drugs that can cause Alzheimer’s disease and dementia

The cause of this epidemic, like so many others, is often said by conventional doctors to be ‘unknown’. The common causes given are factors related to an ageing population, genetics and family history, and life style factors such as smoking, obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure and high cholesterol. 

None of these seem sufficient to explain the extraordinary rise in dementia, from 1 in 1906 to the huge numbers outlined above.

The magazine ‘What Doctors Don’t Tell You’ (WDDTY) in October 2015 stated that”
“Evidence is emerging that a large coterie of drugs for conditions such as high cholesterol, depression and insomnia can all bring on dementia”

The self-published book by Grace E Jackson, called ‘Drug Induced Dementia - a perfect crime’ takes us through, and catalogues the vast amount of scientific evidence that conventional medical drugs are the primary cause of all forms of dementia, which has certainly become one of the more rampant epidemic conditions of our time.

Anyone who is concerned about contracting Alzheimer’s Disease, and anyone who is caring for someone diagnosed with dementia should read this book.

Dementia is almost certainly an epidemic caused, to a considerable extent, by the increased consumption of pharmaceutical drugs during the last 100 years. The rise in pharmaceutical drug taking has been reflected and mirrored by the rise of dementia. And the global incidence of dementia also reflects the amount of drugs consumed in different countries.

Aluminium and Mercury
The association of aluminium and mercury with dementia is well established, and rarely challenged now. In modern society we have increased our contact with these  poisonous substances. This would include contract through dental amalgam filling, a mercury based compound placed routinely in our teeth, in a wet environment that leeches this poison into our bodies, close to our brain). 

Vaccines
And both these metals can, of course, be found as an ingredient in most, if not all vaccines. These vaccines are usually injected directly into our bloodstreams!

The Influenza Vaccine
Dr Hugh Fudenberg, MD, one of the world's leading immuno-geneticists, has found that people who have had 5 consecutive ‘flu vaccinations between 1970 and 1980 (the years he studied) the chance of getting Alzheimer's Disease was 10 times higher than if he/she had one, 2 or no shots. Dr. Fudenberg said that this was due to the mercury and aluminium elements in ‘flu vaccinations, and that the gradual mercury and aluminium build-up in the brain causes cognitive dysfunction. (Hugh Fudenberg, MD, is Founder and Director of Research, Neuro lmmuno Therapeutic Research Foundation, and this information came from transcribed notes of his speech at the NVIC International Vaccine Conference, Arlington, VA September, 1997).

Dr Haley, in NeuroReport, 12(4): 733-737, 2001, said this about the association between mercury and Alzheimer’s disease.
  “Seven of the characteristic markers that we look for to distinguish Alzheimer’s disease can be produced in normal brain tissues, or cultures of neurons, by the addition of extremely low levels of mercury. In addition, research has shown that Alzheimer’s diseased patients have at least 3 times higher blood levels of mercury than controls. How much more research is necessary before the appropriate regulatory bodies respond with restrictions on the use of mercury-leaking dental amalgam fillings and ALL vaccines?”

Antidepressant drugs
Antidepressant drugs have been linked with dementia. WDDTY (Oct 2015) in its article ‘The Damaged Brain’ says that antidepressants appear to target the brain’s white matter, causing damage and functional impairment. It quotes four studies (Stroke, 2008; 39:857-862, ProcNatlAcadSciUSA, 2003;100:1387-92, AmJPathol, 20012; 158: 453-68, JAffectDisord, 2009;117:24-29) that “have found a greater incidence of dementia among populations using antidepressants.”

“the rate of developing dementia was increased compared to the rate among persons unexposed to antidepressants. Nevertheless, the rate of dementia changed over time; thus during the initial prescription periods the rate increased with the number of prescriptions”.

The study went on to suggest that long-term treatment with antidepressants “was associated with a reduction in the rate of dementia”. This is an amazing suggestion, that anyone who suffers dementia from taking antidepressant drugs might consider that them ‘long-term’! However, the rate of reduction in dementia was “not to the same level as the rate for the general population.”

Antipsychotic drugs
WDDTY (Oct 2015) also outlines the known links between dementia and antipsychotic drugs like Clozaril, Zyprexa, Risperdal and Seroquel. Again it highlights. Two of these (IntJGeriatrPsychiaatry 2005; 20: 872-5, AlzheimerDisAssocDisord, 1994;8: 2011; 211-27) focused on autopsy studies which showed that those who had taken antipsychotic drugs showed evidence of brain deterioration “suggestive of Alzheimer’s, or some other form of dementia”., both indicating that taking antipsychotics more than doubled the patients chances of having dementia.

Another study (JNeurolNeurosurgPsychiatry, 2007; 78:233-9) found that taking an antipsychotic drug alongside an antidepressant quadrupled the patients’ chances of having dementia.

One UK study (LancetNeurol, 2009; 8: 151-7) found that antipsychotic drugs were not effective in doing what they were supposed to do, but were associated with greater cognitive decline.

And one British study (AgeAgeing, 1998; 27:181-8), which looked at every case in a dementia register for 1993-4, found that 13% had a past history of psychiatric treatment, and the use of psychiatric drugs was nearly four times greater among those who had gone on to develop dementia.

Statin drugs
WDDTY October 2015 also outlined the evidence linking dementia with Statins. These drugs, according to conventional medicine, lower cholesterol, and help to keep Alzheimer’s at bay. They do not, and as the article says, there is no evidence that it does so.

“…the lack of effectiveness of statins for treating AD was firmly established in 2009, when two reviewers independently analysed two large-scale randomised controlled trials… Their conclusion was that statins given late in life to people at risk of vascular disease won’t prevent AD or dementia”.

In fact, as the article suggests, it is now becoming clear that cholesterol has a useful role in maintaining brain function, which means that any attempt to lower cholesterol (with statins or any other drugs) has the reverse effect. Profession Yeon-Kyun Shin, who undertook this research, is quoted as saying”

“If you try to lower the cholesterol by taking medicine that is attacking the machinery of cholesterol synthesis in the liver, that medicine goes to the brain too. And then it reduces the synthesis of cholesterol, which is necessary in the brain”.

Sleeping pills and Benzodiazepine drugs
Benzodiazepine drugs, including that well-known ex-‘wonder’ drug Valium, are not only addictive, not only associated with severe long-term side effects, not only connected with many deaths, they are also connected with a 50% increased risk of dementia.

Doctors are aware of this link. The GP magazine, Pulse, published an article “Benzodiazepine use linked with development of dementia” in September 2012.

“Patients taking benzodiazepines have more than a threefold increased risk of developing dementia, shows a long-term UK epidemiological study. Welsh researchers followed more than 1,100 men over 22 years and found 9% of them took benzodiazepines regularly at some point during the study…. This level of risk remained when researchers adjusted to take account of factors such as psychological distress”.

Despite this, Benzodiazepine drugs continue to be prescribed, and are still prescribed for more than the one month limit imposed on them. They are still used as sleeping pills, especially for older people, who of course are more vulnerable to dementia.

The WDDTY (Oct 2015) confirms this picture, and points to further studies linking Benzodiazepine drugs with dementia, and explains how the link is done.

“Newer studies show this has to do with their effect on brain gangliosides. These molecules, made up of fat and sugar, are largely found in brain lipids and covering every neutron. They are essential for regulating cell growth, forming neural synapses and responding to foreign invaders like toxins and bacteria. Without gangliosides, we lose the myelin on our nerve cells, or the entire neton, and may even die”.

Anticholinergic drugs
Anticholinergic drugs are more common than you might think. Indeed, many people will be taking them without realising they fall into this category. They are prescribed to relieve many conditions, such as insomnia and sleep problems, high blood pressure, heart disease, chronic lung problems, poor digestion, tremors, muscle stiffness, weakness, anxiety and incontinence. Many are innocently available without prescription at the local chemist!

An article in the British Medical Journal (Feb 2006; 332: 455 – 459) refers to research that says doctors should be aware that anticholinergic drugs can cause confusion, memory loss and disorientation. Karen Ritchie, the author of the article, told Reuters (London) that:
"A large number of elderly people are taking medications that can mimic early dementia and are likely to be classed as having early dementia. A very large number of people with so-called early dementia have these effects due to drug consumption. The drugs they are taking are very common - they include things like antihistamines”

"What we showed is that many of the people who are classified in this way have it due to the medication they are taking, and not because they have early Alzheimer's disease".

The magazine ‘What Doctors Don’t Tell You (WDDTY) said this of the study, demonstrating how quickly dementia can develop when taking these drugs.
“In a study of 3,690 older people taking anticholinergic medication, the researchers discovered that mental functioning began to be affected within 60 days”. 

Antihistamine and allergy drugs
Antihistamines are anticholinergic drugs. The abstract of one study, published here on the PubMed website, says the following:

“Antihistamines are frequently administered to psychiatric patients for a variety of purposes. Several large studies of schizophrenics have revealed an extremely high prevalence of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology compared with that in the general population. The neuroleptic treatment of schizophrenia appears to be implicated in this phenomenon. Many of the neuroleptics have anticholinergic effects, some being antihistamines…. It is proposed here that anticholinergics, including many antihistamines, either exacerbate the Alzheimer process or possibly contribute to its etiology/pathogenesis through their effects on cerebral cholinergic systems”.


Proton-Pump Inhibitors
Proton-Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) reduce the amount of acid made by the stomach, and are used to treat acid reflux and ulcers of the stomach and the gut. The link between PPI drugs and dementia is confirmed in several studies. One study, ‘Acid inhibitors may raise risk of developing dementia’ found that they may lead to confusion, delirium and dementia, and particularly that memory problems were seen in older black people, who were chronic users.

Another study, ‘Risk of dementia in elderly patients with the use of proton pump inhibitors’ assessed the association between the use of PPIs and the risk of dementia in older people. It found that patients receiving PPI drugs had a significantly increased risk of any dementia … and Alzheimer’s disease … compared with non-users. They concluded that

“Due to the major burden of dementia on public health and the lack of curative medication, this finding is of  high interest to research on dementia and provides indication for dementia prevention”.

Yet this study, ‘Inappropriate prescribing of proton pump inhibitors in older patients: effects of an education strategy’ found that there was frequent prescribing of PPI drugs for older patients that was entirely inappropriate, and “independently associated with co-morbidities and dementia”.

Polypharmacy
Mixing drugs, or taking many drugs at the same time, as so many people now do on the instruction and advice of conventional doctors, is also implicated in causing dementia. As the WDDTY website says:

“Multiple medications - known as polypharmacy -can fog the brain, while diabetes and high blood pressure (hypertension) drugs can also accelerate cognitive decline, say researchers from the University of Michigan Medical School. It’s a difficult balance to get right, say the researchers, but doctors and patients shouldn’t overdo the pharmaceutical response to hypertension and diabetes. Low blood pressure and low blood sugar are directly associated to cognitive performance”.

Perhaps in order to avoid dementia, ‘getting the balance right’ is easier than these researchers believe. Recognise the culpability of pharmaceutical drugs in creating the current epidemic of dementia, refuse to take, and look for safer alternative treatments!

Other drugs
This is not an exhaustive list of the Big Pharma drugs known to cause THE ILLNESS, but it is hopefully sufficient for anyone taking, or planning to take any pharmaceutical drug to undertake a thorough web search for possible associations.

The connection is, of course, not recognised by the Conventional Medical Establishment, although any cursory examination of the British National Formulary demonstrates that there are a large number of Big Pharma drugs that list 'confusion' as a 'side-effect'. Yet there is good evidence to connect dementia with drugs.


It should not perhaps be a surprise that powerful and toxic pharmaceutical drugs can cause dementia. The brain is the most delicate organ we have, and the most easily damaged. Certainly, anyone who has a relative or friend who has dementia, particularly in the early stages, should examine whether conventional pharmaceutical drugs have been a potential cause of dementia.

Monday, 12 January 2015

Laudanum. Not just a medicine of the past! Gee's Linctus

Watch most movies, or read most books set in the 18th and 19th Centuries, the drug Laudanum will often feature. It appears to have been the conventional medical drug of choice for a variety of conditions and illnesses for a very long time. What many people will not realise is that it is still around, and still being prescribed in many countries, although, of course, with a different name. But it is still present in many ‘medicines’ that many of us were given as children, and can still give to our children today!
Anyone for Gee’s Linctus?

Laudanum is a drug based on opium. It is a tincture containing almost all of the opium alkaloids, including morphine and codeine. Its use dates back to the 16th Century, and Paracelsus. It is a highly potent narcotic and extremely addictive. Laudanum was used to treat a variety of ailments until the 20th Century. Today it is usually referred to as ‘tincture of opium’, and can still be prescribed in countries such as the USA and Britain.

Thus drug was used to treat coughs, sleeplessness, diarrhoea, and pain, including menstrual cramping, but as Wikipedia confirms, it was “widely prescribed for ailments from colds to meningitis to cardiac diseases”. It was routinely used for children, and widely used in epidemics of cholera, dysentery and yellow fever in the 19th Century, and also for diseases such as dropsy (Oedema), consumption (TB) and rheumatism.


The side effects and adverse reactions to Laudanum, tincture of opium are well known. They are an extension and refinement of those known in the 19th Century.

Difficulty having a bowel movement (stool)
hives or welts
nausea
vomiting
Anxiety
blurred vision
blue lips and fingernails
chest pain or discomfort
chills
cold sweats
coma
confusion
constricted, pinpoint, or small pupils (black part of eye)
cool, clammy skin
coughing that sometimes produces a pink frothy sputum
depression
difficult, fast, or noisy breathing, sometimes with wheezing
difficult or troubled breathing
difficulty sleeping
disorientation
dizziness, faintness, lightheadedness when getting up from a lying or sitting position
drowsiness to profound coma
fast heartbeat
hallucination
headache
increased hunger
increased sweating
irregular, fast or slow, or shallow breathing
lethargy
lightheadedness
mood or other mental changes
nervousness
nightmares
no blood pressure or pulse
no muscle tone or movement
not breathing
pale or blue lips, fingernails, or skin
seizures
shakiness
shortness of breath
slow or irregular heartbeat
slurred speech
stopping of heart
swelling in legs and ankles
unconsciousness
unusual tiredness or weakness
Itching skin
redness of skin
skin rash

So the 20th Century has seen the use of Laudanum much proscribed, despite its well known DIEs (Disease Inducing Effects), it can still be prescribed within conventional medicine! I have already mentioned Gees Linctus.

Side effects given on a packet of Gee’s Linctus include nausea, sickness, constipation, drowsiness, confusion , loss of appetite, diarrhoea, stomach pain, shortage of breath, difficulty in urinating, skin itching and flushing, rash, low blood pressure. And “prolonged use may lead to tolerance (the medicine loses its effect) and dependence’.

Not much changes, then, including the willingness of the conventional medical establishment to continue giving us harmful and dangerous drugs, even for the consumptions of our children!


Thursday, 8 January 2015

Big Pharma's snout at the feeding trough!

Some Big Pharma drug companies are annoyed, and are threatening to take the British government to court. The problem? They may be denied access to a large pot of NHS money.

The government set up the 'Cancer Drugs Fund in 2010, one of its first acts following their election, to provide extra funding for medicines that were considered 'too expensive', and 'poor value for money' by NICE, and so could not be prescribed within the NHS. £200 million was set aside. This has risen to £280 million. And apparently the fund is already overspent by £30 million this year.

Does that sound generous? Well, apparently not generous enough for the Big Pharma companies. Two drug companies are threatening to take the government to court because their drugs are being 're-assessed'. Their feeding frenzy at the NHS feeding trough is being threatened!

Just how arrogant is this? Public money is being spent on ludicrously expensive drugs, and the drug companies object to a decision that seeks to ensure that taxpayer's money is being spent appropriately! They must assume they have some kind of 'right' to the money being spent on their drugs. And that our government has not responsibility to make decisions that are detrimental to their profitability.

Of course, that is not the way they put it, or how our meek mainstream media is describing it. The government is denying patients access to 'life-saving' drugs (according to the BBC), or, if you prefer the 'Mail Online',

"Thousands of women with advanced breast cancer are set to be denied ‘last chance’ medication that can give them extra months, if not years, with their loved ones".

Although the Media is sufficiently honest to point out the costs of these drugs, up to £90,000 per year per patient, little or nothing was said about the safety of effectiveness of the six drugs, Eribulin, Avastin, Kadcyla, Afinitor, Tyverb and Perjeta. So let's consider just one of these, Avastin, and consider it's history.

Avastin was approved in February 2004 by the FDA, the US drug regulator. Within 5 months, however, it discovered that the new 'wonder drug' could cause stroke, heart attacks, angina, and double the risk of a fatal blood clot. Apparently, even when it was approved, Avastin was known to  cause fatal stomach perforations and congestive heart failure. The situation only got worse, though.


So, it would seem that what is being 'denied' to 'thousands of women with advanced breast cancer' is a 'life saving' drug that is exorbitantly expensive, dangerous to our health, and useless too!

Does that sound like a good deal? Well, it is good enough for the drug companies. And apparently it is good enough for our mainstream media, including the BBC, who continue to refuse to tell us the truth about conventional drugs and vaccines.

I suppose we are just expected to believe the passive and unquestioning promotion of pharmaceutical drugs, take it when they are given to us regardless of their affects on our health, and pay exorbitantly for the privilege!

Anyone want to stop jumping to Big Pharma's tune?

If your child is diagnosed with ADHD this is what you should know!

ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder) is described by NHS Choices as “a group of behavioural symptoms that include inattentiveness, hyperactivity and impulsiveness”. Common symptoms include a short attention span, being being easily distracted, restlessness, constant fidgeting, overactivity, and being impulsive.

History and facts about the illness
Yet the first thing that should be decided is whether such a disease actually exists! It is certainly an illness that has sold lots of pharmaceutical drugs, and raised huge profits for Big Pharma drug companies. And it is certainly a disease that was only ‘diagnosed’ in relatively recent times, and in many ways it is little more than a collection of descriptions of childhood behaviour that once would have been described as ‘children being naughty’.

Yet the epidemic rise of the ‘disease’, and the huge number of children who have grown up, and are growing up, diagnosed with this condition suggests that it is more than drug companies profiting from diagnosing behaviour as ‘illness’. This is probably just part of the problem.

As long ago as 2003 statistics were telling us that Britain was in the grip of an epidemic of ADHD. It was said that at least 1 in 20 schoolchildren, 360,000 in England and Wales alone, were thought to have ADHD to some degree, and that prescriptions for the drug Ritalin, had doubled in the previous four years.

More recently, in 2014, a major new study, “The impending globalization of ADHD: Notes on the expansion and growth of a medicalized disorder” has raised important issues about the disease. The study was undertaken at Brandeis University, in the USA. It was published in the journal ‘Social Science and Medicine’. The Mail Online discussed this study in its article “Rise in ADHD cases is 'due to marketing, not medicine': Study blames increase on drug companies, pushy support groups, and people self-diagnosing online”.  And NHS Choices have also discussed the study in their article “Is growth in ADHD 'caused by marketing'?  It describes the study as “a well-researched and interesting article which reflects current concerns about the medicalisation of symptoms that might be viewed as part of the human condition, rather than a disorder that needs drug treatment. what does this study show”? 

The study concluded that the problem of ADHD is being medicalised, that children who might once have been described as simply ‘naughty’, or ‘high spirited’, are instead being diagnosed with ADHD. And that once diagnosed they are being prescribed and treated with powerful pharmaceutical drugs, like Ritalin. The study concluded that the "global expansion" and medicalisation of ADHD has been driven by five major causes, notably, the lobbying of the drug industry, the influence of US-based psychiatry which has become drug-focused, the influence of ADHD patient advocacy groups which have become dominated by the drug industry, and the adoption of loose criteria for diagnosing the disease.

The study also look at the astronomic increase in ADHD across the globe. In particular it looked at its growth, starting in the USA some 50 years ago, and moving to the UK, Germany, France, Italy and Brazil. It documents both the growth of ADHD diagnosis, and the prodigious rise of drug-based treatment. 
  • In the UK it says that ADHD is now the most prevalent behavioural disorder, with an estimated 3-9% of children and adolescents having the condition.
  • Drug treatment for ADHD has also risen, with one recent report suggesting that Ritalin prescriptions rose by 11% in GP practices, and by 24% in private practice from 2011-12. 
  • The authors partly ascribe this increase to changes in diagnostic criteria used in the UK. In the past, the UK adopted criteria from the World Health Organization (WHO) for a condition then called hyperkinetic disorder. But there is now a greater use of US criteria globally, which uses different terminology and provides a lower threshold for diagnosis.
The study also noted the influence of drug companies, and in US Psychiatry, which has promoted the use of drugs that than psychotherapy. It states that in the past ADHD drugs were heavily marketed in the US, but as this market become saturated, Big Pharma expanded into international markets, and promoted ADHD drug treatment around the world, first in Europe, but also in countries such as Brazil, Mexico and Japan. 

It is the activities of the drug companies, and the consequences of their drugs on the health of young children, that is the focus of attention here.

Yet before doing so, the study outlined another factor in the rise of ADHD, concerning the role and influence of ADHD Patient Advocacy Groups. The study found that these groups often worked closely with drug companies in promoting drug treatments, and that in some countries, such as France and Italy, ADHD rates are lower, possible arising from a stronger cultural tradition of using psychoanalytic rather than drug-based approaches for behavioural problems, and greater restrictions on the use of ADHD drugs.
  
Drugs used to treat this disease (what new diseases might you get by taking them?)

The diagnosis of ADHD has caused a rapid increase in drug taking amongst children and young people in recent decades. There are many estimates about how many children are now taking ADHD drugs, like Ritalin. WDDTY estimated in 2012 that one in seven children in the USA were now taking this drug. Other estimates say that one in five children have been diagnosed. This is why ADHD has been described for may years now as an ‘epidemic’. Either the disease, or drug-taking arising from the diagnosis of the disease, is touching the lives of huge numbers of our young people.

Moreover, the drugs used by the conventional medical establishment for the treatment of ADHD are neither effective or safe. NHS Choices says that “there is no cure for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but treatment can help relieve the symptoms and make the condition much less of a problem in day-to-day life.

This NHS website outlines four main drugs for the treatment of ADHD, which they say are not permanent cures for ADHD, but “they can help someone with the condition concentrate better, be less impulsive, feel calmer, and learn and practise new skills”.

1. Methylphenidate
“Methylphenidate is the most commonly used medication for ADHD. It belongs to a group of medicines called stimulants that work by increasing activity in the brain, particularly in areas that play a part in controlling attention and behaviour”.

After describing how the drug is administered and monitored, and who it is suitable for, NHS Choices lists these common side effects:
a small increase in blood pressure and heart rate
loss of appetite, which can lead to weight loss or poor weight gain
trouble sleeping
headaches
stomach aches
mood swings

Methylphenidate drugs come in many different names, including Concerta, Daytrana, Equasym, Medikinet, Metadate, Methylin, Quillivant, and the most widely used of all, Ritalin.

2. Dexamfetamine
“Dexamfetamine is also a stimulant medication that works in a similar way to methylphenidate, by stimulating areas of the brain that play a part in controlling attention and behaviour”.

NHS Choices list these common side effects of dexamfetamine:
decreased appetite
mood swings
agitation and aggression
dizziness
headaches
diarrhoea
nausea and vomiting

Dexamfetamine drugs are also marketed under many different brand-names, including Elvanse, Adderall, Dexedrine, Foxalin, .

3. Lisdexamfetamine
“Lisdexamfetamine is a similar medication to dexamfetamine, and works in the same way”.

NHS Choices lists these common side effects of lisdexamfetamine:
decreased appetite, which can lead to weight loss or poor weight gain
aggression
drowsiness
dizziness
headaches
diarrhoea
nausea and vomiting

The drug is branded under names such as Vyvanse.

4. Atomoxetine (Strattera)
“Atomoxetine works differently to other ADHD medications. It is known as a selective noradrenaline uptake inhibitor (SNRI), which means it increases the amount of a chemical in the brain called noradrenaline. This chemical passes messages between brain cells, and increasing the amount can aid concentration and help control impulses”.

NHS Choices lists these common side effects of atomoxetine, which is often branded as Strattera, Intuniv or Kapvay).
a small increase in blood pressure and heart rate
nausea and vomiting
stomach aches
trouble sleeping
dizziness
headaches
irritability

It goes on to admit that Atomoxetine has also been linked to some more serious side effects that it's important to look out for, including suicidal thoughts and liver damage.

NHS Choices have been somewhat ‘conservative’ about how dangerous these ADHD drugs can be, and the harm they can cause to children. The dangers are certainly far greater than the NHS, or the Conventional Medical Establishment are prepared to admit.

To demonstrate the point, in a WDDTY report dated February 2005, listed following ‘side-effects’ of Ritalin (the most widely used ADHD drug), indicating just how damaging these drugs can be to young children.

Cardiovascular
  • Rapid heart beat (palpitations, tachycardia)
  • High blood pressure (hypertension)
  • Unusual heart rhythm (arrythmia)
  • Heart attack (cardiac arrest)
Central Nervous System
  • Altered mental status (psychosis)
  • Hallucinations
  • Depression or excitement
  • Convulsions / seizures (excessive brain stimulation)
  • Drowsiness or "dopey" feeling
  • Confusion
  • Lack of sleep (insomnia)
  • Agitation, irritation, anxiety, nervousness
  • Hostility
  • Unhappiness (Dysphoria)
  • Impaired mental abilities (cognitive impairment on tests)
  • Jerky movements (Dyskinesias, tics, Tourette's syndrome)
  • Nervous habits (such as picking at skin or pulling hair)
  • Compulsive behaviour
  • Depression/over-sensitivity
  • Decreased social interest
  • Zombie-like behaviour
Gastrointestinal
  • Eating disorders (anorexia)
  • Nausea
  • Vomiting
  • Stomach ache, cramps
  • dry mouth
  • constipation
  • Abnormal liver function tests

Endocrine/Metabolic
  • Growth problems (pituitary dysfunction)
  • Weight loss
Other
  • Blurred vision
  • Headache
  • Dizziness
  • Rash/conjunctivitis/hives
  • Hair loss
  • Inflammation of the skin (dermatitis)
  • Blood disorders (anorexia, leukoplacia)
  • Involuntary discharge of urine (enuresis)
  • Fever
  • Joint pain
  • Unusual sweating
  • Withdrawal and Rebound
  • Sleep problems (insomnia)
  • Evening crash
  • Depression
  • Over-activity and irritability
  • Worsening of ADHD-like symptoms
So Ritalin, and no doubt other ADHD drugs, can cause innumerable problems that are not openly admitted. And remember, these drugs are not offered as a ‘cure’, or even a treatment for the condition - they offer just an amelioration of some of the symptoms. And they normally have to be taken for many years.


Drugs that may have caused this illness (what drugs might have caused this disease?)

Most information sources on ADHD state that the causes of the disease are unknown! Whenever this statement is made, about this or any other disease, run for cover! There is a cover-up going on, and there is a need to look deeper! The causes may be known, but it is not in the financial interests of powerful social forces to admit them. Such is the case with ADHD.

First, there is the extent to which ADHD is prescribed when the child is genuinely ‘naughty’, and not ‘ill’ at all. Before drugging children, it is always best to use therapeutic technique, such as Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Behaviour Therapy, Social Skills training, et al, which are designed to look into the social, emotional and behaviour of the child.

Once this has been discounted or corrected, there are many factors known, or suspected to cause ADHD, all relating to our modern environment.
  • The use of Pesticides has been implicated, more present in the foods we eat now than ever before.
  • Aspects of our modern diet, particularly highly processed, artificial foods and drinks. Sugar, artificial sweeteners, food colourings and additives have frequently been blame for hyperactivity. It has been suggested that GMO foods might also be implicated.
  • Lead, and some toxic plastic materials, have also been implicated (WDDTY May 2010)
But the DIEs of conventional medical drugs also, almost inevitably, play a role.
Yet the drug most seriously implicated in causing the ADHD epidemic are vaccines, and in particular, the early childhood vaccines, DPT and MMR. And it is these links between Big Pharma drugs and disease that are the most ferociously resisted by the Conventional Medical Establishment, supporteded by our compliant mainstream media. Indeed, the link between vaccines and their toxic ingredients and other brain-based diseases, such as Autism, and Alzheimer’s Disease, appears to be impossible to discuss with the people who are in control of our so-called ‘Free Press’.

Yet the evidence supporting the link between vaccines and mental illnesses, including ADHD, is extremely strong, and below are a number of websites, most of them providing references to research, that outline this evidence.


A web search for “ADHD” “Vaccines” will come up with many similar websites, all pointing to the evidence that the Conventional Medical Establishment wants to deny.

Yet equally, the search will also come up with websites that deny any such link! There are strong and powerful vested interests that want to ensure that we continue to accept their drugs and vaccines, and their bland reassurances about their safety, so that they can continue to ply their very profitable business.

In particular, bogus and dishonest research was published in 2004 that (we were told) proved conclusively that there was no link between the MMR vaccine and autism. However, the lead researcher has now admitted, 10 years later, that he lied, and that important information was withheld in order to come to this conclusion!

The Conventional Medical Establishment knows drugs don’t work - but it continues to prescribe them anyway.

In days when the BBC were prepared to tackle serious health problems, the Panorama programme produced two programmes about ADHD, one in 2000, the other in 2007.

The programme, "What next for Craig", was shown on 12th November 2007. It stated that about ½ million young people then suffered from ADHD. Of these about 57,000 were taking drugs, costing the NHS about £28m each year. Many of these children had been on the drugs for many years. However these figures are estimates as, quite amazingly, the Department of Health did not know exactly how many children were taking Ritalin-type drugs!

The Panorama programme had a simple message. Craig had featured in the 2000 programme. At that time, drugs like Ritalin were said to be a more effective treatment than Psychotherapy. Apparently this belief arose from an MTA study undertaken in the USA that had studied 600 children over a year - a study described by one participant as "the best study done on planet earth". The study led to a three-fold increase in Ritalin prescriptions. 

However, the MTA study continued to study the same children, and found that they suffered a decrease in the rate of growth, both in height and weight, whilst having no beneficial long-term effects on behaviour whatsoever!

So the 'best study done on planet earth' still managed to get it wrong, as with so many Big Pharma ‘wonder drugs’. So by 2007, the study was saying that psychotherapy was more efficient than drugs! As far as Craig was concerned, although drugs ‘calmed him down temporarily’, 7 years later there was no discernable difference in his behaviour.

After the lapse of a further 7 years, still nothing seems to have changed, and the Conventional Medical Establishment continues pursuing the same, failed treatments, quite regaredless of any evidence.

Craig’s family were still looking for doctors for help though. By then, Craig had been prescribed anti-psychotic drugs to control his ‘impulsive behaviour’. They were not working either, but apparently about 8,000 children were on Antipsychotic drugs in 2005.

So, if change is to secure it seems that parents and patients will need to make their own decisions, and take their own action. Our conventional doctors are not able, or willing to change their practice in the light of evidence.